Cargando…
Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis
BACKGROUND: While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31765397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225628 |
_version_ | 1783473262780481536 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Mustafa M. Roukoz, Henri Trivedi, Jaimin R. Bhan, Adarsh Ravichandran, Ashwin Dhawan, Rahul Cowger, Jennifer Bhat, Geetha Birks, Emma J. Slaughter, Mark S. Gopinathannair, Rakesh |
author_facet | Ahmed, Mustafa M. Roukoz, Henri Trivedi, Jaimin R. Bhan, Adarsh Ravichandran, Ashwin Dhawan, Rahul Cowger, Jennifer Bhat, Geetha Birks, Emma J. Slaughter, Mark S. Gopinathannair, Rakesh |
author_sort | Ahmed, Mustafa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007–2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6876793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68767932019-12-08 Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis Ahmed, Mustafa M. Roukoz, Henri Trivedi, Jaimin R. Bhan, Adarsh Ravichandran, Ashwin Dhawan, Rahul Cowger, Jennifer Bhat, Geetha Birks, Emma J. Slaughter, Mark S. Gopinathannair, Rakesh PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007–2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival. Public Library of Science 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6876793/ /pubmed/31765397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225628 Text en © 2019 Ahmed et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ahmed, Mustafa M. Roukoz, Henri Trivedi, Jaimin R. Bhan, Adarsh Ravichandran, Ashwin Dhawan, Rahul Cowger, Jennifer Bhat, Geetha Birks, Emma J. Slaughter, Mark S. Gopinathannair, Rakesh Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title | Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title_full | Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title_short | Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis |
title_sort | questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31765397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedmustafam questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT roukozhenri questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT trivedijaiminr questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT bhanadarsh questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT ravichandranashwin questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT dhawanrahul questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT cowgerjennifer questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT bhatgeetha questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT birksemmaj questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT slaughtermarks questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis AT gopinathannairrakesh questionableutilityofdigoxininleftventricularassistdevicerecipientsamulticenterretrospectiveanalysis |