Cargando…

Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval

Background and study aims  Ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions are challenging to remove endoscopically. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective cohort study, performed at an academic tertiary US hospital. Sessile polyps or flat ICV lesions ≥ 20 mm in size referred for endoscopic mucosal resection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ponugoti, Prasanna L., Broadley, Heather M., Garcia, Jonathan, Rex, Douglas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9035
_version_ 1783473325901611008
author Ponugoti, Prasanna L.
Broadley, Heather M.
Garcia, Jonathan
Rex, Douglas K.
author_facet Ponugoti, Prasanna L.
Broadley, Heather M.
Garcia, Jonathan
Rex, Douglas K.
author_sort Ponugoti, Prasanna L.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions are challenging to remove endoscopically. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective cohort study, performed at an academic tertiary US hospital. Sessile polyps or flat ICV lesions ≥ 20 mm in size referred for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included. Successful resection rates, complication rates and recurrence were compared to lesions ≥ 20 mm in size not located on the ICV. Results  During an 18-year interval, there were 118 ICV lesions ≥ 20 mm with mean size 28.6 mm (44.9 % females; mean age 71.6 years), comprising 9.03 % of all referred polyps. Ninety ICV lesions (76.3 %) were resected endoscopically, compared to 91.3 % of non-ICV lesions ( P  < 0.001). However, in the most recent 8 years, successful EMR of ICV lesions increased to 93 %. Conventional adenomas comprised 92.2 % of ICV lesions and 7.8 % were serrated. Delayed hemorrhage and perforation occurred in 3.3 % and 0 % of ICV lesions, respectively, compared to 4.8 % and 0.5 % in the non-ICV group. At first follow-up, rates of residual polyp in the ICV and non-ICV groups were 16.5 % and 13.6 %, respectively ( P  = 0.485). At second follow-up residual rates in the ICV and non-ICV lesion groups were 18.6 % and 6.7 %, respectively ( P  = .005). Conclusions  Large ICV polyps are a common source of tertiary referrals. Over an 18-year experience, risk of EMR for ICV polyps was numerically lower, and risk of recurrence was numerically higher at first follow and significantly higher at second follow-up compared to non-ICV polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6877426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68774262019-12-01 Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval Ponugoti, Prasanna L. Broadley, Heather M. Garcia, Jonathan Rex, Douglas K. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions are challenging to remove endoscopically. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective cohort study, performed at an academic tertiary US hospital. Sessile polyps or flat ICV lesions ≥ 20 mm in size referred for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were included. Successful resection rates, complication rates and recurrence were compared to lesions ≥ 20 mm in size not located on the ICV. Results  During an 18-year interval, there were 118 ICV lesions ≥ 20 mm with mean size 28.6 mm (44.9 % females; mean age 71.6 years), comprising 9.03 % of all referred polyps. Ninety ICV lesions (76.3 %) were resected endoscopically, compared to 91.3 % of non-ICV lesions ( P  < 0.001). However, in the most recent 8 years, successful EMR of ICV lesions increased to 93 %. Conventional adenomas comprised 92.2 % of ICV lesions and 7.8 % were serrated. Delayed hemorrhage and perforation occurred in 3.3 % and 0 % of ICV lesions, respectively, compared to 4.8 % and 0.5 % in the non-ICV group. At first follow-up, rates of residual polyp in the ICV and non-ICV groups were 16.5 % and 13.6 %, respectively ( P  = 0.485). At second follow-up residual rates in the ICV and non-ICV lesion groups were 18.6 % and 6.7 %, respectively ( P  = .005). Conclusions  Large ICV polyps are a common source of tertiary referrals. Over an 18-year experience, risk of EMR for ICV polyps was numerically lower, and risk of recurrence was numerically higher at first follow and significantly higher at second follow-up compared to non-ICV polyps. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-12 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6877426/ /pubmed/31788547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9035 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ponugoti, Prasanna L.
Broadley, Heather M.
Garcia, Jonathan
Rex, Douglas K.
Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title_full Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title_fullStr Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title_short Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
title_sort endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9035
work_keys_str_mv AT ponugotiprasannal endoscopicmanagementoflargeileocecalvalvelesionsoveran18yearinterval
AT broadleyheatherm endoscopicmanagementoflargeileocecalvalvelesionsoveran18yearinterval
AT garciajonathan endoscopicmanagementoflargeileocecalvalvelesionsoveran18yearinterval
AT rexdouglask endoscopicmanagementoflargeileocecalvalvelesionsoveran18yearinterval