Cargando…
Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling
We introduce and compare two approaches to consistently combine release and runout in GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling. The computational experiments are conducted on data from the Schnepfau investigation area in western Austria, which include a high-quality landslide inventory and a land...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7 |
_version_ | 1783473341466673152 |
---|---|
author | Mergili, Martin Schwarz, Leonhard Kociu, Arben |
author_facet | Mergili, Martin Schwarz, Leonhard Kociu, Arben |
author_sort | Mergili, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | We introduce and compare two approaches to consistently combine release and runout in GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling. The computational experiments are conducted on data from the Schnepfau investigation area in western Austria, which include a high-quality landslide inventory and a landslide release susceptibility map. The two proposed methods use a constrained random walk approach for downslope routing of mass points and employ the probability density function (PDF) and the cumulative density function (CDF) of the angles of reach and the travel distances of the observed landslides. The bottom-up approach (A) produces a quantitative spatial probability at the cost of losing the signal of the release susceptibility, whereas the top-down approach (B) retains the signal and performs better, but results in a semi-quantitative score. Approach B also reproduces the observed impact area much better than a pure analysis of landslide release susceptibility. The levels of performance and conservativeness of the model results also strongly depend on the choice of the PDF and CDF (angle of reach, maximum travel distance, or a combination of both). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6877493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68774932019-12-10 Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling Mergili, Martin Schwarz, Leonhard Kociu, Arben Landslides Original Paper We introduce and compare two approaches to consistently combine release and runout in GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling. The computational experiments are conducted on data from the Schnepfau investigation area in western Austria, which include a high-quality landslide inventory and a landslide release susceptibility map. The two proposed methods use a constrained random walk approach for downslope routing of mass points and employ the probability density function (PDF) and the cumulative density function (CDF) of the angles of reach and the travel distances of the observed landslides. The bottom-up approach (A) produces a quantitative spatial probability at the cost of losing the signal of the release susceptibility, whereas the top-down approach (B) retains the signal and performs better, but results in a semi-quantitative score. Approach B also reproduces the observed impact area much better than a pure analysis of landslide release susceptibility. The levels of performance and conservativeness of the model results also strongly depend on the choice of the PDF and CDF (angle of reach, maximum travel distance, or a combination of both). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-07-01 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6877493/ /pubmed/31832052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Mergili, Martin Schwarz, Leonhard Kociu, Arben Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title | Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title_full | Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title_fullStr | Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title_short | Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
title_sort | combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mergilimartin combiningreleaseandrunoutinstatisticallandslidesusceptibilitymodeling AT schwarzleonhard combiningreleaseandrunoutinstatisticallandslidesusceptibilitymodeling AT kociuarben combiningreleaseandrunoutinstatisticallandslidesusceptibilitymodeling |