Cargando…

An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany

Models can be used to plan, evaluate, and improve programs for animal disease control. In Germany, a nationwide compulsory program to eradicate Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is in force since January 2011. As it is associated with substantial expenditures, the program is currently under revision. To p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gethmann, Jörn, Probst, Carolina, Bassett, Jason, Blunk, Pascal, Hövel, Philipp, Conraths, Franz J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00406
_version_ 1783473391580217344
author Gethmann, Jörn
Probst, Carolina
Bassett, Jason
Blunk, Pascal
Hövel, Philipp
Conraths, Franz J.
author_facet Gethmann, Jörn
Probst, Carolina
Bassett, Jason
Blunk, Pascal
Hövel, Philipp
Conraths, Franz J.
author_sort Gethmann, Jörn
collection PubMed
description Models can be used to plan, evaluate, and improve programs for animal disease control. In Germany, a nationwide compulsory program to eradicate Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is in force since January 2011. As it is associated with substantial expenditures, the program is currently under revision. To provide the basis for a science-based decision on the future course of BVD control in Germany, we evaluated 13 scenarios (sc1-13) with respect to the chance of reaching freedom from disease and their economic implications for a period of 20 years (2011–2030). To simulate the impact of different control strategies on disease dynamics, a disease spread model was developed. To estimate the effects of a transient infection (TI) on animal level, a gross margin analysis was performed. To assess the value of cattle that died prematurely, a valuation model was used. Finally, an economic model was developed to perform a cost-benefit analysis and to compare each control scenario with a baseline setting with no BVD control. Costs comprised the expenditures for diagnostics, vaccination, preventive culling, and trade restrictions. Benefits were animal and production losses avoided by having control measures in place. The results show that reducing the PI prevalence on animal level to 0% is only feasible in scenarios that combine antigen or antibody testing with compulsory vaccination. All other scenarios, i.e., those based exclusively on a “test and cull” approach, including the current control program, will, according to the model, not achieve freedom of BVD by 2030. On the other hand, none of the scenarios that may lead to complete BVD eradication is economically attractive [benefit-cost ratio (BCR) between 0.64 and 0.94]. The average direct costs of BVD in Germany are estimated at 113 million Euros per year (34–402 million Euros), corresponding to 28.3 million Euros per million animals. Only the concepts of the former and the current national BVD control program (“ear tag testing and culling”) may reduce the BVD prevalence to 0.01% with an acceptable BCR (net present value of 222 and 238 million Euros, respectively, with a BCR of 1.22 and 1.24).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6877714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68777142019-12-04 An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany Gethmann, Jörn Probst, Carolina Bassett, Jason Blunk, Pascal Hövel, Philipp Conraths, Franz J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Models can be used to plan, evaluate, and improve programs for animal disease control. In Germany, a nationwide compulsory program to eradicate Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is in force since January 2011. As it is associated with substantial expenditures, the program is currently under revision. To provide the basis for a science-based decision on the future course of BVD control in Germany, we evaluated 13 scenarios (sc1-13) with respect to the chance of reaching freedom from disease and their economic implications for a period of 20 years (2011–2030). To simulate the impact of different control strategies on disease dynamics, a disease spread model was developed. To estimate the effects of a transient infection (TI) on animal level, a gross margin analysis was performed. To assess the value of cattle that died prematurely, a valuation model was used. Finally, an economic model was developed to perform a cost-benefit analysis and to compare each control scenario with a baseline setting with no BVD control. Costs comprised the expenditures for diagnostics, vaccination, preventive culling, and trade restrictions. Benefits were animal and production losses avoided by having control measures in place. The results show that reducing the PI prevalence on animal level to 0% is only feasible in scenarios that combine antigen or antibody testing with compulsory vaccination. All other scenarios, i.e., those based exclusively on a “test and cull” approach, including the current control program, will, according to the model, not achieve freedom of BVD by 2030. On the other hand, none of the scenarios that may lead to complete BVD eradication is economically attractive [benefit-cost ratio (BCR) between 0.64 and 0.94]. The average direct costs of BVD in Germany are estimated at 113 million Euros per year (34–402 million Euros), corresponding to 28.3 million Euros per million animals. Only the concepts of the former and the current national BVD control program (“ear tag testing and culling”) may reduce the BVD prevalence to 0.01% with an acceptable BCR (net present value of 222 and 238 million Euros, respectively, with a BCR of 1.22 and 1.24). Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6877714/ /pubmed/31803768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00406 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gethmann, Probst, Bassett, Blunk, Hövel and Conraths. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Gethmann, Jörn
Probst, Carolina
Bassett, Jason
Blunk, Pascal
Hövel, Philipp
Conraths, Franz J.
An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title_full An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title_fullStr An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title_full_unstemmed An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title_short An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany
title_sort epidemiological and economic simulation model to evaluate strategies for the control of bovine virus diarrhea in germany
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00406
work_keys_str_mv AT gethmannjorn anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT probstcarolina anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT bassettjason anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT blunkpascal anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT hovelphilipp anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT conrathsfranzj anepidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT gethmannjorn epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT probstcarolina epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT bassettjason epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT blunkpascal epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT hovelphilipp epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany
AT conrathsfranzj epidemiologicalandeconomicsimulationmodeltoevaluatestrategiesforthecontrolofbovinevirusdiarrheaingermany