Cargando…

Science and Social Media

He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Regenberg, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066
_version_ 1783473403208925184
author Regenberg, Alan
author_facet Regenberg, Alan
author_sort Regenberg, Alan
collection PubMed
description He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving and increasing presence of social media in science, its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential to develop applications that improve how we review, approve, and engage around the work of science. Social media use in science presents significant challenges. The potential benefits of addressing these challenges and developing new social media tools include greater transparency, access, and engagement—and could nurture the public's trust. stem cells translational medicine 2019;8:1226&1229
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6877767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68777672019-11-29 Science and Social Media Regenberg, Alan Stem Cells Transl Med Perspectives He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving and increasing presence of social media in science, its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential to develop applications that improve how we review, approve, and engage around the work of science. Social media use in science presents significant challenges. The potential benefits of addressing these challenges and developing new social media tools include greater transparency, access, and engagement—and could nurture the public's trust. stem cells translational medicine 2019;8:1226&1229 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6877767/ /pubmed/31282132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066 Text en © 2019 The Author. stem cells translational medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Regenberg, Alan
Science and Social Media
title Science and Social Media
title_full Science and Social Media
title_fullStr Science and Social Media
title_full_unstemmed Science and Social Media
title_short Science and Social Media
title_sort science and social media
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066
work_keys_str_mv AT regenbergalan scienceandsocialmedia