Cargando…
Science and Social Media
He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066 |
_version_ | 1783473403208925184 |
---|---|
author | Regenberg, Alan |
author_facet | Regenberg, Alan |
author_sort | Regenberg, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving and increasing presence of social media in science, its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential to develop applications that improve how we review, approve, and engage around the work of science. Social media use in science presents significant challenges. The potential benefits of addressing these challenges and developing new social media tools include greater transparency, access, and engagement—and could nurture the public's trust. stem cells translational medicine 2019;8:1226&1229 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6877767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68777672019-11-29 Science and Social Media Regenberg, Alan Stem Cells Transl Med Perspectives He Jiankui et al. conducted an experiment that resulted in the birth of the first human babies with germline gene editing. Initial and predominant communications of their work occurred via social media and outside of the norms for reviewing, approving, and engaging around work in science. This case provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolving and increasing presence of social media in science, its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential to develop applications that improve how we review, approve, and engage around the work of science. Social media use in science presents significant challenges. The potential benefits of addressing these challenges and developing new social media tools include greater transparency, access, and engagement—and could nurture the public's trust. stem cells translational medicine 2019;8:1226&1229 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6877767/ /pubmed/31282132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066 Text en © 2019 The Author. stem cells translational medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Regenberg, Alan Science and Social Media |
title | Science and Social Media |
title_full | Science and Social Media |
title_fullStr | Science and Social Media |
title_full_unstemmed | Science and Social Media |
title_short | Science and Social Media |
title_sort | science and social media |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6877767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT regenbergalan scienceandsocialmedia |