Cargando…
Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women
BACKGROUND: Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) is currently the best available ovarian cancer screening biomarker. However, CA125 has been limited by low sensitivity and specificity in part due to normal variation between individuals. Personal characteristics that influence CA125 could be used to improve it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6878636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0591-4 |
_version_ | 1783473488763289600 |
---|---|
author | Sasamoto, Naoko Babic, Ana Rosner, Bernard A. Fortner, Renée T. Vitonis, Allison F. Yamamoto, Hidemi Fichorova, Raina N. Titus, Linda J. Tjønneland, Anne Hansen, Louise Kvaskoff, Marina Fournier, Agnès Mancini, Francesca Romana Boeing, Heiner Trichopoulou, Antonia Peppa, Eleni Karakatsani, Anna Palli, Domenico Grioni, Sara Mattiello, Amalia Tumino, Rosario Fiano, Valentina Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte Weiderpass, Elisabete Gram, Inger T. Quirós, J. Ramón Lujan-Barroso, Leila Sánchez, Maria-Jose Colorado-Yohar, Sandra Barricarte, Aurelio Amiano, Pilar Idahl, Annika Lundin, Eva Sartor, Hanna Khaw, Kay-Tee Key, Timothy J. Muller, David Riboli, Elio Gunter, Marc Dossus, Laure Trabert, Britton Wentzensen, Nicolas Kaaks, Rudolf Cramer, Daniel W. Tworoger, Shelley S. Terry, Kathryn L. |
author_facet | Sasamoto, Naoko Babic, Ana Rosner, Bernard A. Fortner, Renée T. Vitonis, Allison F. Yamamoto, Hidemi Fichorova, Raina N. Titus, Linda J. Tjønneland, Anne Hansen, Louise Kvaskoff, Marina Fournier, Agnès Mancini, Francesca Romana Boeing, Heiner Trichopoulou, Antonia Peppa, Eleni Karakatsani, Anna Palli, Domenico Grioni, Sara Mattiello, Amalia Tumino, Rosario Fiano, Valentina Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte Weiderpass, Elisabete Gram, Inger T. Quirós, J. Ramón Lujan-Barroso, Leila Sánchez, Maria-Jose Colorado-Yohar, Sandra Barricarte, Aurelio Amiano, Pilar Idahl, Annika Lundin, Eva Sartor, Hanna Khaw, Kay-Tee Key, Timothy J. Muller, David Riboli, Elio Gunter, Marc Dossus, Laure Trabert, Britton Wentzensen, Nicolas Kaaks, Rudolf Cramer, Daniel W. Tworoger, Shelley S. Terry, Kathryn L. |
author_sort | Sasamoto, Naoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) is currently the best available ovarian cancer screening biomarker. However, CA125 has been limited by low sensitivity and specificity in part due to normal variation between individuals. Personal characteristics that influence CA125 could be used to improve its performance as screening biomarker. METHODS: We developed and validated linear and dichotomous (≥35 U/mL) circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women without ovarian cancer who participated in one of five large population-based studies: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO, n = 26,981), European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, n = 861), the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS/NHSII, n = 81), and the New England Case Control Study (NEC, n = 923). The prediction models were developed using stepwise regression in PLCO and validated in EPIC, NHS/NHSII and NEC. RESULT: The linear CA125 prediction model, which included age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and duration, parity, hysterectomy, age at menopause, and duration of hormone therapy (HT), explained 5% of the total variance of CA125. The correlation between measured and predicted CA125 was comparable in PLCO testing dataset (r = 0.18) and external validation datasets (r = 0.14). The dichotomous CA125 prediction model included age, race, BMI, smoking status and duration, hysterectomy, time since menopause, and duration of HT with AUC of 0.64 in PLCO and 0.80 in validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The linear prediction model explained a small portion of the total variability of CA125, suggesting the need to identify novel predictors of CA125. The dichotomous prediction model showed moderate discriminatory performance which validated well in independent dataset. Our dichotomous model could be valuable in identifying healthy women who may have elevated CA125 levels, which may contribute to reducing false positive tests using CA125 as screening biomarker. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6878636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68786362019-11-29 Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women Sasamoto, Naoko Babic, Ana Rosner, Bernard A. Fortner, Renée T. Vitonis, Allison F. Yamamoto, Hidemi Fichorova, Raina N. Titus, Linda J. Tjønneland, Anne Hansen, Louise Kvaskoff, Marina Fournier, Agnès Mancini, Francesca Romana Boeing, Heiner Trichopoulou, Antonia Peppa, Eleni Karakatsani, Anna Palli, Domenico Grioni, Sara Mattiello, Amalia Tumino, Rosario Fiano, Valentina Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte Weiderpass, Elisabete Gram, Inger T. Quirós, J. Ramón Lujan-Barroso, Leila Sánchez, Maria-Jose Colorado-Yohar, Sandra Barricarte, Aurelio Amiano, Pilar Idahl, Annika Lundin, Eva Sartor, Hanna Khaw, Kay-Tee Key, Timothy J. Muller, David Riboli, Elio Gunter, Marc Dossus, Laure Trabert, Britton Wentzensen, Nicolas Kaaks, Rudolf Cramer, Daniel W. Tworoger, Shelley S. Terry, Kathryn L. J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) is currently the best available ovarian cancer screening biomarker. However, CA125 has been limited by low sensitivity and specificity in part due to normal variation between individuals. Personal characteristics that influence CA125 could be used to improve its performance as screening biomarker. METHODS: We developed and validated linear and dichotomous (≥35 U/mL) circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women without ovarian cancer who participated in one of five large population-based studies: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO, n = 26,981), European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, n = 861), the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS/NHSII, n = 81), and the New England Case Control Study (NEC, n = 923). The prediction models were developed using stepwise regression in PLCO and validated in EPIC, NHS/NHSII and NEC. RESULT: The linear CA125 prediction model, which included age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and duration, parity, hysterectomy, age at menopause, and duration of hormone therapy (HT), explained 5% of the total variance of CA125. The correlation between measured and predicted CA125 was comparable in PLCO testing dataset (r = 0.18) and external validation datasets (r = 0.14). The dichotomous CA125 prediction model included age, race, BMI, smoking status and duration, hysterectomy, time since menopause, and duration of HT with AUC of 0.64 in PLCO and 0.80 in validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The linear prediction model explained a small portion of the total variability of CA125, suggesting the need to identify novel predictors of CA125. The dichotomous prediction model showed moderate discriminatory performance which validated well in independent dataset. Our dichotomous model could be valuable in identifying healthy women who may have elevated CA125 levels, which may contribute to reducing false positive tests using CA125 as screening biomarker. BioMed Central 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6878636/ /pubmed/31771659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0591-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sasamoto, Naoko Babic, Ana Rosner, Bernard A. Fortner, Renée T. Vitonis, Allison F. Yamamoto, Hidemi Fichorova, Raina N. Titus, Linda J. Tjønneland, Anne Hansen, Louise Kvaskoff, Marina Fournier, Agnès Mancini, Francesca Romana Boeing, Heiner Trichopoulou, Antonia Peppa, Eleni Karakatsani, Anna Palli, Domenico Grioni, Sara Mattiello, Amalia Tumino, Rosario Fiano, Valentina Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte Weiderpass, Elisabete Gram, Inger T. Quirós, J. Ramón Lujan-Barroso, Leila Sánchez, Maria-Jose Colorado-Yohar, Sandra Barricarte, Aurelio Amiano, Pilar Idahl, Annika Lundin, Eva Sartor, Hanna Khaw, Kay-Tee Key, Timothy J. Muller, David Riboli, Elio Gunter, Marc Dossus, Laure Trabert, Britton Wentzensen, Nicolas Kaaks, Rudolf Cramer, Daniel W. Tworoger, Shelley S. Terry, Kathryn L. Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title | Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title_full | Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title_short | Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
title_sort | development and validation of circulating ca125 prediction models in postmenopausal women |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6878636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0591-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sasamotonaoko developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT babicana developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT rosnerbernarda developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT fortnerreneet developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT vitonisallisonf developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT yamamotohidemi developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT fichorovarainan developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT tituslindaj developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT tjønnelandanne developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT hansenlouise developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT kvaskoffmarina developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT fournieragnes developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT mancinifrancescaromana developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT boeingheiner developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT trichopoulouantonia developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT peppaeleni developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT karakatsanianna developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT pallidomenico developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT grionisara developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT mattielloamalia developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT tuminorosario developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT fianovalentina developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT onlandmoretncharlotte developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT weiderpasselisabete developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT gramingert developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT quirosjramon developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT lujanbarrosoleila developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT sanchezmariajose developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT coloradoyoharsandra developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT barricarteaurelio developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT amianopilar developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT idahlannika developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT lundineva developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT sartorhanna developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT khawkaytee developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT keytimothyj developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT mullerdavid developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT ribolielio developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT guntermarc developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT dossuslaure developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT trabertbritton developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT wentzensennicolas developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT kaaksrudolf developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT cramerdanielw developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT tworogershelleys developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen AT terrykathrynl developmentandvalidationofcirculatingca125predictionmodelsinpostmenopausalwomen |