Cargando…

Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook

The aim of European water policy is to achieve good ecological status in all rivers, lakes, coastal and transitional waters by 2027. Currently, more than half of water bodies are in a degraded condition and nutrient enrichment is one of the main culprits. Therefore, there is a pressing need to estab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poikane, Sandra, Kelly, Martyn G., Salas Herrero, Fuensanta, Pitt, Jo-Anne, Jarvie, Helen P., Claussen, Ulrich, Leujak, Wera, Lyche Solheim, Anne, Teixeira, Heliana, Phillips, Geoff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6878824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133888
_version_ 1783473521581621248
author Poikane, Sandra
Kelly, Martyn G.
Salas Herrero, Fuensanta
Pitt, Jo-Anne
Jarvie, Helen P.
Claussen, Ulrich
Leujak, Wera
Lyche Solheim, Anne
Teixeira, Heliana
Phillips, Geoff
author_facet Poikane, Sandra
Kelly, Martyn G.
Salas Herrero, Fuensanta
Pitt, Jo-Anne
Jarvie, Helen P.
Claussen, Ulrich
Leujak, Wera
Lyche Solheim, Anne
Teixeira, Heliana
Phillips, Geoff
author_sort Poikane, Sandra
collection PubMed
description The aim of European water policy is to achieve good ecological status in all rivers, lakes, coastal and transitional waters by 2027. Currently, more than half of water bodies are in a degraded condition and nutrient enrichment is one of the main culprits. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish reliable and comparable nutrient criteria that are consistent with good ecological status. This paper highlights the wide range of nutrient criteria currently in use by Member States of the European Union to support good ecological status and goes on to suggest that inappropriate criteria may be hindering the achievement of good status. Along with a comprehensive overview of nutrient criteria, we provide a critical analysis of the threshold concentrations and approaches by which these are set. We identify four essential issues: (1) Different nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus) are used for different water categories in different countries. (2) The use of different nutrient fractions (total, dissolved inorganic) and statistical summary metrics (e.g., mean, percentiles, seasonal, annual) currently hampers comparability between countries, particularly for rivers, transitional and coastal waters. (3) Wide ranges in nutrient threshold values within shared water body types, in some cases showing more than a 10-fold difference in concentrations. (4) Different approaches used to set threshold nutrient concentrations to define the boundary between “good” and “moderate” ecological status. Expert judgement-based methods resulted in significantly higher (less stringent) good-moderate threshold values compared with data-driven approaches, highlighting the importance of consistent and rigorous approaches to criteria setting. We suggest that further development of nutrient criteria should be based on relationships between ecological status and nutrient concentrations, taking into account the need for comparability between different water categories, water body types within these categories, and countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6878824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68788242019-12-10 Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook Poikane, Sandra Kelly, Martyn G. Salas Herrero, Fuensanta Pitt, Jo-Anne Jarvie, Helen P. Claussen, Ulrich Leujak, Wera Lyche Solheim, Anne Teixeira, Heliana Phillips, Geoff Sci Total Environ Article The aim of European water policy is to achieve good ecological status in all rivers, lakes, coastal and transitional waters by 2027. Currently, more than half of water bodies are in a degraded condition and nutrient enrichment is one of the main culprits. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish reliable and comparable nutrient criteria that are consistent with good ecological status. This paper highlights the wide range of nutrient criteria currently in use by Member States of the European Union to support good ecological status and goes on to suggest that inappropriate criteria may be hindering the achievement of good status. Along with a comprehensive overview of nutrient criteria, we provide a critical analysis of the threshold concentrations and approaches by which these are set. We identify four essential issues: (1) Different nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus) are used for different water categories in different countries. (2) The use of different nutrient fractions (total, dissolved inorganic) and statistical summary metrics (e.g., mean, percentiles, seasonal, annual) currently hampers comparability between countries, particularly for rivers, transitional and coastal waters. (3) Wide ranges in nutrient threshold values within shared water body types, in some cases showing more than a 10-fold difference in concentrations. (4) Different approaches used to set threshold nutrient concentrations to define the boundary between “good” and “moderate” ecological status. Expert judgement-based methods resulted in significantly higher (less stringent) good-moderate threshold values compared with data-driven approaches, highlighting the importance of consistent and rigorous approaches to criteria setting. We suggest that further development of nutrient criteria should be based on relationships between ecological status and nutrient concentrations, taking into account the need for comparability between different water categories, water body types within these categories, and countries. Elsevier 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6878824/ /pubmed/31756856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133888 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Poikane, Sandra
Kelly, Martyn G.
Salas Herrero, Fuensanta
Pitt, Jo-Anne
Jarvie, Helen P.
Claussen, Ulrich
Leujak, Wera
Lyche Solheim, Anne
Teixeira, Heliana
Phillips, Geoff
Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title_full Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title_fullStr Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title_full_unstemmed Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title_short Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
title_sort nutrient criteria for surface waters under the european water framework directive: current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6878824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133888
work_keys_str_mv AT poikanesandra nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT kellymartyng nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT salasherrerofuensanta nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT pittjoanne nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT jarviehelenp nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT claussenulrich nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT leujakwera nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT lychesolheimanne nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT teixeiraheliana nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook
AT phillipsgeoff nutrientcriteriaforsurfacewatersundertheeuropeanwaterframeworkdirectivecurrentstateoftheartchallengesandfutureoutlook