Cargando…

The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Lesion characteristics (anatomy, calcification, tortuosity and angulation), vessel morphology, and lack of support add complexity of coronary intervention. Guidezilla catheter, acting as an extension of guide catheter system (mother-in-child catheter), helps to overcome these complexitie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Prakash, Aggarwal, Puneet, Sinha, Santosh Kumar, Khanra, Dibbendu, Razi, Mahmodullah, Sharma, Awdesh Kumar, Thakur, Ramesh, Pandey, Umeshwar, Krishna, Vinay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803331
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr949
_version_ 1783473554274123776
author Kumar, Prakash
Aggarwal, Puneet
Sinha, Santosh Kumar
Khanra, Dibbendu
Razi, Mahmodullah
Sharma, Awdesh Kumar
Thakur, Ramesh
Pandey, Umeshwar
Krishna, Vinay
author_facet Kumar, Prakash
Aggarwal, Puneet
Sinha, Santosh Kumar
Khanra, Dibbendu
Razi, Mahmodullah
Sharma, Awdesh Kumar
Thakur, Ramesh
Pandey, Umeshwar
Krishna, Vinay
author_sort Kumar, Prakash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lesion characteristics (anatomy, calcification, tortuosity and angulation), vessel morphology, and lack of support add complexity of coronary intervention. Guidezilla catheter, acting as an extension of guide catheter system (mother-in-child catheter), helps to overcome these complexities by enhancing backup during complex intervention. METHODS: The present retrospective, single-center study included 13,157 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through both transfemoral and transradial routes from January 2015 to July 2019 at LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India among which Guidezilla™ catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) was used in 156 patients. Study endpoints were target lesion crossing, procedural success, and complications. The clinical, angiographic and procedural data of all 156 patients were evaluated to assess safety and efficacy of Guidezilla extension catheter (GEC). RESULTS: The mean age of the enrolled patients was 61.2 ± 8.67 years. Type-C lesion was commonest (69.9%) followed by B2 (22.4%) and B1 (7.7%). The commonest indication for its use was tortuosity (30.1%) followed by calcification (21.1%), angulation (18.8%), chronic total occlusion (17.9%), distally located lesion (8.3%), and anomalous origin of vessel in 3.8%. The right coronary artery (39.2%) was most commonly intervened artery followed by left anterior descending (LAD) (30.8%), left circumflex (LCX) (19.9%), multivessels (7.6%), and saphenous vein graft in 2.5%. The mean depth of intubation was 4.2 ± 1.9 cm. Mean diameter of stents was 34.2 ± 14.4 mm while mean length of stents was 31.2 ± 10.2 mm. Lesions were modified using aggressive pre-dilatation in 87.8%, followed by cutting balloon in 10.9%. GEC was delivered across the lesion using buddy wire technique (9.6%), balloon-assisted tracking (BAT) in 30.1%, and balloon-assisted sliding and tracking (BLAST) in 4.5% of patients. Stent implantation was successful in 151 out of 156 patients with success rate of 96.7%. Overall failure rate was 3.3% which was contributed by extreme tortuosity, angulation, and severe calcification. Guidezilla-associated procedural complication (dissection, stent dislodgement, shaft breakage) were reported in three patients (1.9%) who were successfully managed. CONCLUSION: s Guidezilla system acting as mother-in-child extension catheter is a safe and effective tool which provides additional backup support and increases success rate of PCI for complex coronary lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6879049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68790492019-12-05 The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study Kumar, Prakash Aggarwal, Puneet Sinha, Santosh Kumar Khanra, Dibbendu Razi, Mahmodullah Sharma, Awdesh Kumar Thakur, Ramesh Pandey, Umeshwar Krishna, Vinay Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Lesion characteristics (anatomy, calcification, tortuosity and angulation), vessel morphology, and lack of support add complexity of coronary intervention. Guidezilla catheter, acting as an extension of guide catheter system (mother-in-child catheter), helps to overcome these complexities by enhancing backup during complex intervention. METHODS: The present retrospective, single-center study included 13,157 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through both transfemoral and transradial routes from January 2015 to July 2019 at LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India among which Guidezilla™ catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) was used in 156 patients. Study endpoints were target lesion crossing, procedural success, and complications. The clinical, angiographic and procedural data of all 156 patients were evaluated to assess safety and efficacy of Guidezilla extension catheter (GEC). RESULTS: The mean age of the enrolled patients was 61.2 ± 8.67 years. Type-C lesion was commonest (69.9%) followed by B2 (22.4%) and B1 (7.7%). The commonest indication for its use was tortuosity (30.1%) followed by calcification (21.1%), angulation (18.8%), chronic total occlusion (17.9%), distally located lesion (8.3%), and anomalous origin of vessel in 3.8%. The right coronary artery (39.2%) was most commonly intervened artery followed by left anterior descending (LAD) (30.8%), left circumflex (LCX) (19.9%), multivessels (7.6%), and saphenous vein graft in 2.5%. The mean depth of intubation was 4.2 ± 1.9 cm. Mean diameter of stents was 34.2 ± 14.4 mm while mean length of stents was 31.2 ± 10.2 mm. Lesions were modified using aggressive pre-dilatation in 87.8%, followed by cutting balloon in 10.9%. GEC was delivered across the lesion using buddy wire technique (9.6%), balloon-assisted tracking (BAT) in 30.1%, and balloon-assisted sliding and tracking (BLAST) in 4.5% of patients. Stent implantation was successful in 151 out of 156 patients with success rate of 96.7%. Overall failure rate was 3.3% which was contributed by extreme tortuosity, angulation, and severe calcification. Guidezilla-associated procedural complication (dissection, stent dislodgement, shaft breakage) were reported in three patients (1.9%) who were successfully managed. CONCLUSION: s Guidezilla system acting as mother-in-child extension catheter is a safe and effective tool which provides additional backup support and increases success rate of PCI for complex coronary lesions. Elmer Press 2019-12 2019-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6879049/ /pubmed/31803331 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr949 Text en Copyright 2019, Kumar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Prakash
Aggarwal, Puneet
Sinha, Santosh Kumar
Khanra, Dibbendu
Razi, Mahmodullah
Sharma, Awdesh Kumar
Thakur, Ramesh
Pandey, Umeshwar
Krishna, Vinay
The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title_full The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title_fullStr The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title_short The Safety and Efficacy of Guidezilla Catheter (Mother-in-Child Catheter) in Complex Coronary Interventions: An Observational Study
title_sort safety and efficacy of guidezilla catheter (mother-in-child catheter) in complex coronary interventions: an observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803331
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr949
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarprakash thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT aggarwalpuneet thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT sinhasantoshkumar thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT khanradibbendu thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT razimahmodullah thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT sharmaawdeshkumar thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT thakurramesh thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT pandeyumeshwar thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT krishnavinay thesafetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT kumarprakash safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT aggarwalpuneet safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT sinhasantoshkumar safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT khanradibbendu safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT razimahmodullah safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT sharmaawdeshkumar safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT thakurramesh safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT pandeyumeshwar safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy
AT krishnavinay safetyandefficacyofguidezillacathetermotherinchildcatheterincomplexcoronaryinterventionsanobservationalstudy