Cargando…

Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may have concomitant heart failure (HF) that determines prognosis despite successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared outcomes of TAVI patients with low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 ml/m(2) body surface area in different HF classes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich, Renker, Matthias, Liebetrau, Christoph, Weferling, Maren, Rolf, Andreas, Doss, Mirko, Möllmann, Helge, Walther, Thomas, Hamm, Christian W., Kim, Won-Keun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31770401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225473
_version_ 1783473564921364480
author Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich
Renker, Matthias
Liebetrau, Christoph
Weferling, Maren
Rolf, Andreas
Doss, Mirko
Möllmann, Helge
Walther, Thomas
Hamm, Christian W.
Kim, Won-Keun
author_facet Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich
Renker, Matthias
Liebetrau, Christoph
Weferling, Maren
Rolf, Andreas
Doss, Mirko
Möllmann, Helge
Walther, Thomas
Hamm, Christian W.
Kim, Won-Keun
author_sort Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may have concomitant heart failure (HF) that determines prognosis despite successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared outcomes of TAVI patients with low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 ml/m(2) body surface area in different HF classes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated by transfemoral TAVI at our center (n = 1822) were classified as 1) ‘HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF)’ (HFpEF, EF ≥50%), 2) ‘HF with mid-range EF’ (HFmrEF, EF 40–49%), or 3) ‘HF with reduced EF’ (HFrEF, EF <40%). Patients with SVI >35 ml/m(2) served as controls. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and symptoms increased stepwise from controls (n = 968) to patients with HFpEF (n = 591), HFmrEF (n = 97), and HFrEF (n = 166). Mortality tended to be highest in HFrEF patients 30 days post-procedure, and it became significant after one year: 10.2% (controls), 13.5% (HFpEF), 13.4% (HFmrEF), and 23.5% (HFrEF). However, symptomatic improvement in survivors of all groups was achieved in the majority of patients without differences among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS and HF benefit from TAVI with respect to symptom alleviation. TAVI in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF led to an identical, favorable post-procedural prognosis that was significantly better than that of patients with HFrEF, which remains a high-risk population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6879149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68791492019-12-08 Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich Renker, Matthias Liebetrau, Christoph Weferling, Maren Rolf, Andreas Doss, Mirko Möllmann, Helge Walther, Thomas Hamm, Christian W. Kim, Won-Keun PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may have concomitant heart failure (HF) that determines prognosis despite successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared outcomes of TAVI patients with low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 ml/m(2) body surface area in different HF classes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated by transfemoral TAVI at our center (n = 1822) were classified as 1) ‘HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF)’ (HFpEF, EF ≥50%), 2) ‘HF with mid-range EF’ (HFmrEF, EF 40–49%), or 3) ‘HF with reduced EF’ (HFrEF, EF <40%). Patients with SVI >35 ml/m(2) served as controls. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and symptoms increased stepwise from controls (n = 968) to patients with HFpEF (n = 591), HFmrEF (n = 97), and HFrEF (n = 166). Mortality tended to be highest in HFrEF patients 30 days post-procedure, and it became significant after one year: 10.2% (controls), 13.5% (HFpEF), 13.4% (HFmrEF), and 23.5% (HFrEF). However, symptomatic improvement in survivors of all groups was achieved in the majority of patients without differences among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS and HF benefit from TAVI with respect to symptom alleviation. TAVI in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF led to an identical, favorable post-procedural prognosis that was significantly better than that of patients with HFrEF, which remains a high-risk population. Public Library of Science 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6879149/ /pubmed/31770401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225473 Text en © 2019 Fischer-Rasokat et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fischer-Rasokat, Ulrich
Renker, Matthias
Liebetrau, Christoph
Weferling, Maren
Rolf, Andreas
Doss, Mirko
Möllmann, Helge
Walther, Thomas
Hamm, Christian W.
Kim, Won-Keun
Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_fullStr Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_short Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_sort outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31770401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225473
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerrasokatulrich outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT renkermatthias outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT liebetrauchristoph outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT weferlingmaren outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT rolfandreas outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT dossmirko outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT mollmannhelge outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT waltherthomas outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT hammchristianw outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT kimwonkeun outcomeofpatientswithheartfailureaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation