Cargando…

Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment

BACKGROUND: A compact passive oxide layer can grow on tantalum (Ta). It has been reported that this oxide layer can facilitate bone ingrowth in vivo though the development of bone-like apatite, which promotes hard and soft tissue adhesion. Thus, Ta surface treatment on facial implant materials may i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakri, Mohammed Mousa, Lee, Sung Ho, Lee, Jong Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0231-3
_version_ 1783473651836780544
author Bakri, Mohammed Mousa
Lee, Sung Ho
Lee, Jong Ho
author_facet Bakri, Mohammed Mousa
Lee, Sung Ho
Lee, Jong Ho
author_sort Bakri, Mohammed Mousa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A compact passive oxide layer can grow on tantalum (Ta). It has been reported that this oxide layer can facilitate bone ingrowth in vivo though the development of bone-like apatite, which promotes hard and soft tissue adhesion. Thus, Ta surface treatment on facial implant materials may improve the tissue response, which could result in less fibrotic encapsulation and make the implant more stable on the bone surface. The purposes of this study were to verify whether surface treatment of facial implant materials using Ta can improve the biohistobiological response and to determine the possibility of potential clinical applications. METHODS: Two different and commonly used implant materials, silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), were treated via Ta ion implantation using a Ta sputtering gun. Ta-treated samples were compared with untreated samples using in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Osteoblast (MG-63) and fibroblast (NIH3T3) cell viability with the Ta-treated implant material was assessed, and the tissue response was observed by placing the implants over the rat calvarium (n = 48) for two different lengths of time. Foreign body and inflammatory reactions were observed, and soft tissue thickness between the calvarium and the implant as well as the bone response was measured. RESULTS: The treatment of facial implant materials using Ta showed a tendency toward increased fibroblast and osteoblast viability, although this result was not statistically significant. During the in vivo study, both Ta-treated and untreated implants showed similar foreign body reactions. However, the Ta-treated implant materials (silicone and ePTFE) showed a tendency toward better histological features: lower soft tissue thickness between the implant and the underlying calvarium as well as an increase in new bone activity. CONCLUSION: Ta surface treatment using ion implantation on silicone and ePTFE facial implant materials showed the possibility of reducing soft tissue intervention between the calvarium and the implant to make the implant more stable on the bone surface. Although no statistically significant improvement was observed, Ta treatment revealed a tendency toward an improved biohistological response of silicone and ePTFE facial implants. Conclusively, tantalum treatment is beneficial and has the potential for clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6879676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68796762019-12-10 Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment Bakri, Mohammed Mousa Lee, Sung Ho Lee, Jong Ho Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: A compact passive oxide layer can grow on tantalum (Ta). It has been reported that this oxide layer can facilitate bone ingrowth in vivo though the development of bone-like apatite, which promotes hard and soft tissue adhesion. Thus, Ta surface treatment on facial implant materials may improve the tissue response, which could result in less fibrotic encapsulation and make the implant more stable on the bone surface. The purposes of this study were to verify whether surface treatment of facial implant materials using Ta can improve the biohistobiological response and to determine the possibility of potential clinical applications. METHODS: Two different and commonly used implant materials, silicone and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), were treated via Ta ion implantation using a Ta sputtering gun. Ta-treated samples were compared with untreated samples using in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Osteoblast (MG-63) and fibroblast (NIH3T3) cell viability with the Ta-treated implant material was assessed, and the tissue response was observed by placing the implants over the rat calvarium (n = 48) for two different lengths of time. Foreign body and inflammatory reactions were observed, and soft tissue thickness between the calvarium and the implant as well as the bone response was measured. RESULTS: The treatment of facial implant materials using Ta showed a tendency toward increased fibroblast and osteoblast viability, although this result was not statistically significant. During the in vivo study, both Ta-treated and untreated implants showed similar foreign body reactions. However, the Ta-treated implant materials (silicone and ePTFE) showed a tendency toward better histological features: lower soft tissue thickness between the implant and the underlying calvarium as well as an increase in new bone activity. CONCLUSION: Ta surface treatment using ion implantation on silicone and ePTFE facial implant materials showed the possibility of reducing soft tissue intervention between the calvarium and the implant to make the implant more stable on the bone surface. Although no statistically significant improvement was observed, Ta treatment revealed a tendency toward an improved biohistological response of silicone and ePTFE facial implants. Conclusively, tantalum treatment is beneficial and has the potential for clinical applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6879676/ /pubmed/31824890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0231-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Bakri, Mohammed Mousa
Lee, Sung Ho
Lee, Jong Ho
Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title_full Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title_fullStr Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title_short Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
title_sort improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6879676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0231-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bakrimohammedmousa improvementofbiohistologicalresponseoffacialimplantmaterialsbytantalumsurfacetreatment
AT leesungho improvementofbiohistologicalresponseoffacialimplantmaterialsbytantalumsurfacetreatment
AT leejongho improvementofbiohistologicalresponseoffacialimplantmaterialsbytantalumsurfacetreatment