Cargando…

Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study

OBJECTIVE: To determine how the UK National Health Service (NHS) is performing relative to health systems of other high income countries, given that it is facing sustained financial pressure, increasing levels of demand, and cuts to social care. DESIGN: Observational study using secondary data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papanicolas, Irene, Mossialos, Elias, Gundersen, Anders, Woskie, Liana, Jha, Ashish K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6326
_version_ 1783473722962739200
author Papanicolas, Irene
Mossialos, Elias
Gundersen, Anders
Woskie, Liana
Jha, Ashish K
author_facet Papanicolas, Irene
Mossialos, Elias
Gundersen, Anders
Woskie, Liana
Jha, Ashish K
author_sort Papanicolas, Irene
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine how the UK National Health Service (NHS) is performing relative to health systems of other high income countries, given that it is facing sustained financial pressure, increasing levels of demand, and cuts to social care. DESIGN: Observational study using secondary data from key international organisations such as Eurostat and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. SETTING: Healthcare systems of the UK and nine high income comparator countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 79 indicators across seven domains: population and healthcare coverage, healthcare and social spending, structural capacity, utilisation, access to care, quality of care, and population health. RESULTS: The UK spent the least per capita on healthcare in 2017 compared with all other countries studied (UK $3825 (£2972; €3392); mean $5700), and spending was growing at slightly lower levels (0.02% of gross domestic product in the previous four years, compared with a mean of 0.07%). The UK had the lowest rates of unmet need and among the lowest numbers of doctors and nurses per capita, despite having average levels of utilisation (number of hospital admissions). The UK had slightly below average life expectancy (81.3 years compared with a mean of 81.7) and cancer survival, including breast, cervical, colon, and rectal cancer. Although several health service outcomes were poor, such as postoperative sepsis after abdominal surgery (UK 2454 per 100 000 discharges; mean 2058 per 100 000 discharges), 30 day mortality for acute myocardial infarction (UK 7.1%; mean 5.5%), and ischaemic stroke (UK 9.6%; mean 6.6%), the UK achieved lower than average rates of postoperative deep venous thrombosis after joint surgery and fewer healthcare associated infections. CONCLUSIONS: The NHS showed pockets of good performance, including in health service outcomes, but spending, patient safety, and population health were all below average to average at best. Taken together, these results suggest that if the NHS wants to achieve comparable health outcomes at a time of growing demographic pressure, it may need to spend more to increase the supply of labour and long term care and reduce the declining trend in social spending to match levels of comparator countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6880250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68802502019-12-04 Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study Papanicolas, Irene Mossialos, Elias Gundersen, Anders Woskie, Liana Jha, Ashish K BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To determine how the UK National Health Service (NHS) is performing relative to health systems of other high income countries, given that it is facing sustained financial pressure, increasing levels of demand, and cuts to social care. DESIGN: Observational study using secondary data from key international organisations such as Eurostat and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. SETTING: Healthcare systems of the UK and nine high income comparator countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 79 indicators across seven domains: population and healthcare coverage, healthcare and social spending, structural capacity, utilisation, access to care, quality of care, and population health. RESULTS: The UK spent the least per capita on healthcare in 2017 compared with all other countries studied (UK $3825 (£2972; €3392); mean $5700), and spending was growing at slightly lower levels (0.02% of gross domestic product in the previous four years, compared with a mean of 0.07%). The UK had the lowest rates of unmet need and among the lowest numbers of doctors and nurses per capita, despite having average levels of utilisation (number of hospital admissions). The UK had slightly below average life expectancy (81.3 years compared with a mean of 81.7) and cancer survival, including breast, cervical, colon, and rectal cancer. Although several health service outcomes were poor, such as postoperative sepsis after abdominal surgery (UK 2454 per 100 000 discharges; mean 2058 per 100 000 discharges), 30 day mortality for acute myocardial infarction (UK 7.1%; mean 5.5%), and ischaemic stroke (UK 9.6%; mean 6.6%), the UK achieved lower than average rates of postoperative deep venous thrombosis after joint surgery and fewer healthcare associated infections. CONCLUSIONS: The NHS showed pockets of good performance, including in health service outcomes, but spending, patient safety, and population health were all below average to average at best. Taken together, these results suggest that if the NHS wants to achieve comparable health outcomes at a time of growing demographic pressure, it may need to spend more to increase the supply of labour and long term care and reduce the declining trend in social spending to match levels of comparator countries. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6880250/ /pubmed/31776110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6326 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Papanicolas, Irene
Mossialos, Elias
Gundersen, Anders
Woskie, Liana
Jha, Ashish K
Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title_full Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title_fullStr Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title_short Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study
title_sort performance of uk national health service compared with other high income countries: observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6326
work_keys_str_mv AT papanicolasirene performanceofuknationalhealthservicecomparedwithotherhighincomecountriesobservationalstudy
AT mossialoselias performanceofuknationalhealthservicecomparedwithotherhighincomecountriesobservationalstudy
AT gundersenanders performanceofuknationalhealthservicecomparedwithotherhighincomecountriesobservationalstudy
AT woskieliana performanceofuknationalhealthservicecomparedwithotherhighincomecountriesobservationalstudy
AT jhaashishk performanceofuknationalhealthservicecomparedwithotherhighincomecountriesobservationalstudy