Cargando…
A survey exploring biomedical editors’ perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines
Background: Improving the completeness of reporting of biomedical research is essential for improving its usability. For this reason, hundreds of reporting guidelines have been created in the last few decades but adherence to these remains suboptimal. This survey aims to inform future evaluations of...
Autores principales: | Blanco, David, Hren, Darko, Kirkham, Jamie J., Cobo, Erik, Schroter, Sara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824668 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20556.3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)