Cargando…
Engagement, not personal characteristics, was associated with the seriousness of regulatory adjudication decisions about physicians: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of processes questioning a physician’s ability to practise —e.g. disciplinary or regulatory— may strongly impact their career and provided care. However, it is unclear what factors relate systematically to such outcomes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we investigate thi...
Autores principales: | Caballero, Javier A., Brown, Steve P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1451-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To Adjudicate or Not Adjudicate: That Is the Question
por: Hicks, Karen A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
por: Győrffy, Zsuzsa, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing the Validity of Using Serious Game Technology to Analyze Physician Decision Making
por: Mohan, Deepika, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Protocol for serious fall injury adjudication in the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) study
por: Ganz, David A., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Association between physician explanatory behaviors and substandard care in adjudicated cases in Japan
por: Hagihara, Akihito, et al.
Publicado: (2011)