Cargando…
Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer
BACKGROUND: Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z |
_version_ | 1783473749631172608 |
---|---|
author | Ahn, Sang Hee Yeo, Adam Unjin Kim, Kwang Hyeon Kim, Chankyu Goh, Youngmoon Cho, Shinhaeng Lee, Se Byeong Lim, Young Kyung Kim, Haksoo Shin, Dongho Kim, Taeyoon Kim, Tae Hyun Youn, Sang Hee Oh, Eun Sang Jeong, Jong Hwi |
author_facet | Ahn, Sang Hee Yeo, Adam Unjin Kim, Kwang Hyeon Kim, Chankyu Goh, Youngmoon Cho, Shinhaeng Lee, Se Byeong Lim, Young Kyung Kim, Haksoo Shin, Dongho Kim, Taeyoon Kim, Tae Hyun Youn, Sang Hee Oh, Eun Sang Jeong, Jong Hwi |
author_sort | Ahn, Sang Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims to a) investigate whether customized, deep-learning-based auto-segmentation could overcome the limitations of manual contouring and b) compare its performance against a typical, atlas-based auto-segmentation method organ structures in liver cancer. METHODS: On-contrast computer tomography image sets of 70 liver cancer patients were used, and four OARs (heart, liver, kidney, and stomach) were manually delineated by three experienced physicians as reference structures. Atlas and deep learning auto-segmentations were respectively performed with MIM Maestro 6.5 (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) and, with a deep convolution neural network (DCNN). The Hausdorff distance (HD) and, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and relative volume difference (RVD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the four different methods in the case of the reference set of the four OAR structures. RESULTS: The atlas-based method yielded the following average DSC and standard deviation values (SD) for the heart, liver, right kidney, left kidney, and stomach: 0.92 ± 0.04 (DSC ± SD), 0.93 ± 0.02, 0.86 ± 0.07, 0.85 ± 0.11, and 0.60 ± 0.13 respectively. The deep-learning-based method yielded corresponding values for the OARs of 0.94 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01, 0.88 ± 0.03, 0.86 ± 0.03, and 0.73 ± 0.09. The segmentation results show that the deep learning framework is superior to the atlas-based framwork except in the case of the liver. Specifically, in the case of the stomach, the DSC, VOE, and RVD showed a maximum difference of 21.67, 25.11, 28.80% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that a deep learning framework could be used more effectively and efficiently compared to atlas-based auto-segmentation for most OARs in human liver cancer. Extended use of the deep-learning-based framework is anticipated for auto-segmentations of other body sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6880380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68803802019-11-29 Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer Ahn, Sang Hee Yeo, Adam Unjin Kim, Kwang Hyeon Kim, Chankyu Goh, Youngmoon Cho, Shinhaeng Lee, Se Byeong Lim, Young Kyung Kim, Haksoo Shin, Dongho Kim, Taeyoon Kim, Tae Hyun Youn, Sang Hee Oh, Eun Sang Jeong, Jong Hwi Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims to a) investigate whether customized, deep-learning-based auto-segmentation could overcome the limitations of manual contouring and b) compare its performance against a typical, atlas-based auto-segmentation method organ structures in liver cancer. METHODS: On-contrast computer tomography image sets of 70 liver cancer patients were used, and four OARs (heart, liver, kidney, and stomach) were manually delineated by three experienced physicians as reference structures. Atlas and deep learning auto-segmentations were respectively performed with MIM Maestro 6.5 (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) and, with a deep convolution neural network (DCNN). The Hausdorff distance (HD) and, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and relative volume difference (RVD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the four different methods in the case of the reference set of the four OAR structures. RESULTS: The atlas-based method yielded the following average DSC and standard deviation values (SD) for the heart, liver, right kidney, left kidney, and stomach: 0.92 ± 0.04 (DSC ± SD), 0.93 ± 0.02, 0.86 ± 0.07, 0.85 ± 0.11, and 0.60 ± 0.13 respectively. The deep-learning-based method yielded corresponding values for the OARs of 0.94 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01, 0.88 ± 0.03, 0.86 ± 0.03, and 0.73 ± 0.09. The segmentation results show that the deep learning framework is superior to the atlas-based framwork except in the case of the liver. Specifically, in the case of the stomach, the DSC, VOE, and RVD showed a maximum difference of 21.67, 25.11, 28.80% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that a deep learning framework could be used more effectively and efficiently compared to atlas-based auto-segmentation for most OARs in human liver cancer. Extended use of the deep-learning-based framework is anticipated for auto-segmentations of other body sites. BioMed Central 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6880380/ /pubmed/31775825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ahn, Sang Hee Yeo, Adam Unjin Kim, Kwang Hyeon Kim, Chankyu Goh, Youngmoon Cho, Shinhaeng Lee, Se Byeong Lim, Young Kyung Kim, Haksoo Shin, Dongho Kim, Taeyoon Kim, Tae Hyun Youn, Sang Hee Oh, Eun Sang Jeong, Jong Hwi Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title | Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title_full | Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title_short | Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
title_sort | comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahnsanghee comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT yeoadamunjin comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT kimkwanghyeon comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT kimchankyu comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT gohyoungmoon comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT choshinhaeng comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT leesebyeong comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT limyoungkyung comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT kimhaksoo comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT shindongho comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT kimtaeyoon comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT kimtaehyun comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT younsanghee comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT oheunsang comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer AT jeongjonghwi comparativeclinicalevaluationofatlasanddeeplearningbasedautosegmentationoforganstructuresinlivercancer |