Cargando…
The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments. In recent years, the SOFA score has become exte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7 |
_version_ | 1783473766307725312 |
---|---|
author | Lambden, Simon Laterre, Pierre Francois Levy, Mitchell M. Francois, Bruno |
author_facet | Lambden, Simon Laterre, Pierre Francois Levy, Mitchell M. Francois, Bruno |
author_sort | Lambden, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments. In recent years, the SOFA score has become extensively used in a range of other applications. A change in the SOFA score of 2 or more is now a defining characteristic of the sepsis syndrome, and the European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in the SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis. The requirement to detect modest serial changes in a patients’ SOFA score therefore means that increased clarity on how the score should be assessed in different circumstances is required. This review explores the development of the SOFA score, its applications and the challenges associated with measurement. In addition, it proposes guidance designed to facilitate the consistent and valid assessment of the score in multicentre sepsis trials involving novel therapeutic agents or interventions. Conclusion The SOFA score is an increasingly important tool in defining both the clinical condition of the individual patient and the response to therapies in the context of clinical trials. Standardisation between different assessors in widespread centres is key to detecting response to treatment if the SOFA score is to be used as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6880479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68804792019-11-29 The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials Lambden, Simon Laterre, Pierre Francois Levy, Mitchell M. Francois, Bruno Crit Care Review The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments. In recent years, the SOFA score has become extensively used in a range of other applications. A change in the SOFA score of 2 or more is now a defining characteristic of the sepsis syndrome, and the European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in the SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis. The requirement to detect modest serial changes in a patients’ SOFA score therefore means that increased clarity on how the score should be assessed in different circumstances is required. This review explores the development of the SOFA score, its applications and the challenges associated with measurement. In addition, it proposes guidance designed to facilitate the consistent and valid assessment of the score in multicentre sepsis trials involving novel therapeutic agents or interventions. Conclusion The SOFA score is an increasingly important tool in defining both the clinical condition of the individual patient and the response to therapies in the context of clinical trials. Standardisation between different assessors in widespread centres is key to detecting response to treatment if the SOFA score is to be used as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials. BioMed Central 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6880479/ /pubmed/31775846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Lambden, Simon Laterre, Pierre Francois Levy, Mitchell M. Francois, Bruno The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title | The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title_full | The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title_fullStr | The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title_short | The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
title_sort | sofa score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambdensimon thesofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT laterrepierrefrancois thesofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT levymitchellm thesofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT francoisbruno thesofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT lambdensimon sofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT laterrepierrefrancois sofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT levymitchellm sofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials AT francoisbruno sofascoredevelopmentutilityandchallengesofaccurateassessmentinclinicaltrials |