Cargando…

Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of parasitological diagnosis of malaria for all age groups in all malaria transmission settings. Many private health facilities rely on malaria microscopy for malaria diagnosis. However, quality of malaria microscopy is affected by numbe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngasala, Billy, Bushukatale, Samweli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2998-1
_version_ 1783473774447820800
author Ngasala, Billy
Bushukatale, Samweli
author_facet Ngasala, Billy
Bushukatale, Samweli
author_sort Ngasala, Billy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of parasitological diagnosis of malaria for all age groups in all malaria transmission settings. Many private health facilities rely on malaria microscopy for malaria diagnosis. However, quality of malaria microscopy is affected by number of factors including availability of skilled laboratory microscopists and lack of quality assurance systems in many malaria endemic countries. This study was carried out to assess quality of malaria microscopy in selected private health facilities in Tanzania. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted from August to September, 2017. A total of 40 private health laboratories in five regions were invited to participate in the study. Data were collected by distributing standardized pre-validated malaria slide-panels to each health facility. Sensitivity, specificity, and strength of agreement (with kappa score) were calculated to assess performance in detecting and quantification of Plasmodium species. RESULTS: Among the 40 health facilities, 31 (77.5%) returned their results to the reference centre (Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences). Overall, the measures of malaria diagnostic accuracy were high, i.e. the sensitivity and specificity of malaria parasite detection by microscopy in the health facilities were 84.3% (95% CI 77–90) and 90.8% (95% CI 83.3–95.7), respectively. There was substantial agreement in parasite detection with (Kappa value: 0.74 (95% 0.65–0.83). However, only 17.8% (24 of 134) of blood slides were interpreted correctly at the health facilities in terms of parasite density counts. CONCLUSION: Although there was substantial agreement between the private health microscopists and experienced microscopists in malaria parasite detection, there was poor performance in parasite counts. This calls for regular in-service training and external quality assessments at private health facilities to enhance the skills of private health facility microscopists in malaria microscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6880513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68805132019-11-29 Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania Ngasala, Billy Bushukatale, Samweli Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of parasitological diagnosis of malaria for all age groups in all malaria transmission settings. Many private health facilities rely on malaria microscopy for malaria diagnosis. However, quality of malaria microscopy is affected by number of factors including availability of skilled laboratory microscopists and lack of quality assurance systems in many malaria endemic countries. This study was carried out to assess quality of malaria microscopy in selected private health facilities in Tanzania. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted from August to September, 2017. A total of 40 private health laboratories in five regions were invited to participate in the study. Data were collected by distributing standardized pre-validated malaria slide-panels to each health facility. Sensitivity, specificity, and strength of agreement (with kappa score) were calculated to assess performance in detecting and quantification of Plasmodium species. RESULTS: Among the 40 health facilities, 31 (77.5%) returned their results to the reference centre (Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences). Overall, the measures of malaria diagnostic accuracy were high, i.e. the sensitivity and specificity of malaria parasite detection by microscopy in the health facilities were 84.3% (95% CI 77–90) and 90.8% (95% CI 83.3–95.7), respectively. There was substantial agreement in parasite detection with (Kappa value: 0.74 (95% 0.65–0.83). However, only 17.8% (24 of 134) of blood slides were interpreted correctly at the health facilities in terms of parasite density counts. CONCLUSION: Although there was substantial agreement between the private health microscopists and experienced microscopists in malaria parasite detection, there was poor performance in parasite counts. This calls for regular in-service training and external quality assessments at private health facilities to enhance the skills of private health facility microscopists in malaria microscopy. BioMed Central 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6880513/ /pubmed/31771572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2998-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ngasala, Billy
Bushukatale, Samweli
Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title_full Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title_fullStr Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title_short Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania
title_sort evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2998-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ngasalabilly evaluationofmalariamicroscopydiagnosticperformanceatprivatehealthfacilitiesintanzania
AT bushukatalesamweli evaluationofmalariamicroscopydiagnosticperformanceatprivatehealthfacilitiesintanzania