Cargando…
Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals
Early modern humans (EMH) are often touted as behaviorally advanced to Neandertals, with more sophisticated technologies, expanded resource exploitation, and more complex clothing production. However, recent analyses have indicated that Neandertals were more nuanced in their behavioral adaptations,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31774826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224573 |
_version_ | 1783473847425564672 |
---|---|
author | Krueger, Kristin L. Willman, John C. Matthews, Gregory J. Hublin, Jean-Jacques Pérez-Pérez, Alejandro |
author_facet | Krueger, Kristin L. Willman, John C. Matthews, Gregory J. Hublin, Jean-Jacques Pérez-Pérez, Alejandro |
author_sort | Krueger, Kristin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early modern humans (EMH) are often touted as behaviorally advanced to Neandertals, with more sophisticated technologies, expanded resource exploitation, and more complex clothing production. However, recent analyses have indicated that Neandertals were more nuanced in their behavioral adaptations, with the production of the Châtelperronian technocomplex, the processing and cooking of plant foods, and differences in behavioral adaptations according to habitat. This study adds to this debate by addressing the behavioral strategies of EMH (n = 30) within the context of non-dietary anterior tooth-use behaviors to glean possible differences between them and their Neandertal (n = 45) counterparts. High-resolution casts of permanent anterior teeth were used to collect microwear textures of fossil and comparative bioarchaeological samples using a Sensofar white-light confocal profiler with a 100x objective lens. Labial surfaces were scanned, totaling a work envelope of 204 x 276 μm for each individual. The microwear textures were examined for post-mortem damage and uploaded to SSFA software packages for surface characterization. Statistical analyses were performed to examine differences in central tendencies and distributions of anisotropy and textural fill volume variables among the EMH sample itself by habitat, location, and time interval, and between the EMH and Neandertal samples by habitat and location. Descriptive statistics for the EMH sample were compared to seven bioarchaeological samples (n = 156) that utilized different tooth-use behaviors to better elucidate specific activities that may have been performed by EMH. Results show no significant differences between the means within the EMH sample by habitat, location, or time interval. Furthermore, there are no significant differences found here between EMH and Neandertals. Comparisons to the bioarchaeological samples suggest both fossil groups participated in clamping and grasping activities. These results indicate that EMH and Neandertals were similar in their non-dietary anterior tooth-use behaviors and provide additional evidence for overlapping behavioral strategies employed by these two hominins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6880970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68809702019-12-08 Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals Krueger, Kristin L. Willman, John C. Matthews, Gregory J. Hublin, Jean-Jacques Pérez-Pérez, Alejandro PLoS One Research Article Early modern humans (EMH) are often touted as behaviorally advanced to Neandertals, with more sophisticated technologies, expanded resource exploitation, and more complex clothing production. However, recent analyses have indicated that Neandertals were more nuanced in their behavioral adaptations, with the production of the Châtelperronian technocomplex, the processing and cooking of plant foods, and differences in behavioral adaptations according to habitat. This study adds to this debate by addressing the behavioral strategies of EMH (n = 30) within the context of non-dietary anterior tooth-use behaviors to glean possible differences between them and their Neandertal (n = 45) counterparts. High-resolution casts of permanent anterior teeth were used to collect microwear textures of fossil and comparative bioarchaeological samples using a Sensofar white-light confocal profiler with a 100x objective lens. Labial surfaces were scanned, totaling a work envelope of 204 x 276 μm for each individual. The microwear textures were examined for post-mortem damage and uploaded to SSFA software packages for surface characterization. Statistical analyses were performed to examine differences in central tendencies and distributions of anisotropy and textural fill volume variables among the EMH sample itself by habitat, location, and time interval, and between the EMH and Neandertal samples by habitat and location. Descriptive statistics for the EMH sample were compared to seven bioarchaeological samples (n = 156) that utilized different tooth-use behaviors to better elucidate specific activities that may have been performed by EMH. Results show no significant differences between the means within the EMH sample by habitat, location, or time interval. Furthermore, there are no significant differences found here between EMH and Neandertals. Comparisons to the bioarchaeological samples suggest both fossil groups participated in clamping and grasping activities. These results indicate that EMH and Neandertals were similar in their non-dietary anterior tooth-use behaviors and provide additional evidence for overlapping behavioral strategies employed by these two hominins. Public Library of Science 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6880970/ /pubmed/31774826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224573 Text en © 2019 Krueger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Krueger, Kristin L. Willman, John C. Matthews, Gregory J. Hublin, Jean-Jacques Pérez-Pérez, Alejandro Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title | Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title_full | Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title_fullStr | Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title_full_unstemmed | Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title_short | Anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and Neandertals |
title_sort | anterior tooth-use behaviors among early modern humans and neandertals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6880970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31774826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kruegerkristinl anteriortoothusebehaviorsamongearlymodernhumansandneandertals AT willmanjohnc anteriortoothusebehaviorsamongearlymodernhumansandneandertals AT matthewsgregoryj anteriortoothusebehaviorsamongearlymodernhumansandneandertals AT hublinjeanjacques anteriortoothusebehaviorsamongearlymodernhumansandneandertals AT perezperezalejandro anteriortoothusebehaviorsamongearlymodernhumansandneandertals |