Cargando…

Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury

Our aim was to create simple and largely scalable machine learning-based algorithms that could predict mortality in a real-time fashion during intensive care after traumatic brain injury. We performed an observational multicenter study including adult TBI patients that were monitored for intracrania...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raj, Rahul, Luostarinen, Teemu, Pursiainen, Eetu, Posti, Jussi P., Takala, Riikka S. K., Bendel, Stepani, Konttila, Teijo, Korja, Miikka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53889-6
_version_ 1783473951681282048
author Raj, Rahul
Luostarinen, Teemu
Pursiainen, Eetu
Posti, Jussi P.
Takala, Riikka S. K.
Bendel, Stepani
Konttila, Teijo
Korja, Miikka
author_facet Raj, Rahul
Luostarinen, Teemu
Pursiainen, Eetu
Posti, Jussi P.
Takala, Riikka S. K.
Bendel, Stepani
Konttila, Teijo
Korja, Miikka
author_sort Raj, Rahul
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to create simple and largely scalable machine learning-based algorithms that could predict mortality in a real-time fashion during intensive care after traumatic brain injury. We performed an observational multicenter study including adult TBI patients that were monitored for intracranial pressure (ICP) for at least 24 h in three ICUs. We used machine learning-based logistic regression modeling to create two algorithms (based on ICP, mean arterial pressure [MAP], cerebral perfusion pressure [CPP] and Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) to predict 30-day mortality. We used a stratified cross-validation technique for internal validation. Of 472 included patients, 92 patients (19%) died within 30 days. Following cross-validation, the ICP-MAP-CPP algorithm’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) increased from 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.74) on day 1 to 0.81 (95% CI 0.75–0.87) on day 5. The ICP-MAP-CPP-GCS algorithm’s AUC increased from 0.72 (95% CI 0.64–0.78) on day 1 to 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.90) on day 5. Algorithm misclassification was seen among patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. In conclusion, we present a new concept of dynamic prognostication for patients with TBI treated in the ICU. Our simple algorithms, based on only three and four main variables, discriminated between survivors and non-survivors with accuracies up to 81% and 84%. These open-sourced simple algorithms can likely be further developed, also in low and middle-income countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6881446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68814462019-12-06 Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury Raj, Rahul Luostarinen, Teemu Pursiainen, Eetu Posti, Jussi P. Takala, Riikka S. K. Bendel, Stepani Konttila, Teijo Korja, Miikka Sci Rep Article Our aim was to create simple and largely scalable machine learning-based algorithms that could predict mortality in a real-time fashion during intensive care after traumatic brain injury. We performed an observational multicenter study including adult TBI patients that were monitored for intracranial pressure (ICP) for at least 24 h in three ICUs. We used machine learning-based logistic regression modeling to create two algorithms (based on ICP, mean arterial pressure [MAP], cerebral perfusion pressure [CPP] and Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) to predict 30-day mortality. We used a stratified cross-validation technique for internal validation. Of 472 included patients, 92 patients (19%) died within 30 days. Following cross-validation, the ICP-MAP-CPP algorithm’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) increased from 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.74) on day 1 to 0.81 (95% CI 0.75–0.87) on day 5. The ICP-MAP-CPP-GCS algorithm’s AUC increased from 0.72 (95% CI 0.64–0.78) on day 1 to 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.90) on day 5. Algorithm misclassification was seen among patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. In conclusion, we present a new concept of dynamic prognostication for patients with TBI treated in the ICU. Our simple algorithms, based on only three and four main variables, discriminated between survivors and non-survivors with accuracies up to 81% and 84%. These open-sourced simple algorithms can likely be further developed, also in low and middle-income countries. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6881446/ /pubmed/31776366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53889-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Raj, Rahul
Luostarinen, Teemu
Pursiainen, Eetu
Posti, Jussi P.
Takala, Riikka S. K.
Bendel, Stepani
Konttila, Teijo
Korja, Miikka
Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title_full Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title_short Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
title_sort machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53889-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rajrahul machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT luostarinenteemu machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT pursiaineneetu machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT postijussip machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT takalariikkask machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT bendelstepani machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT konttilateijo machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury
AT korjamiikka machinelearningbaseddynamicmortalitypredictionaftertraumaticbraininjury