Cargando…

Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindén-Søndersø, Anja, Jungner, Mårten, Spångfors, Martin, Jan, Mohammed, Oscarson, Adam, Choi, Sally, Kander, Thomas, Undén, Johan, Griesdale, Donald, Boyd, John, Bentzer, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7
_version_ 1783473962161799168
author Lindén-Søndersø, Anja
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Jan, Mohammed
Oscarson, Adam
Choi, Sally
Kander, Thomas
Undén, Johan
Griesdale, Donald
Boyd, John
Bentzer, Peter
author_facet Lindén-Søndersø, Anja
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Jan, Mohammed
Oscarson, Adam
Choi, Sally
Kander, Thomas
Undén, Johan
Griesdale, Donald
Boyd, John
Bentzer, Peter
author_sort Lindén-Søndersø, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation fluid administered to patients with septic shock. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in eight intensive care units in Sweden and Canada during 4 months in 2018. Adult patients with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the intensive care unit were eligible for inclusion. Non-resuscitation fluids were defined as fluids other than colloids, blood products and crystalloids at a rate ≥ 5 ml/kg/h. Indication, volume and type of fluid were recorded during the first 5 days after admission. A maximum of 30 patients could be included per centre. To estimate the potential to reduce administration of non-resuscitation fluid, a pragmatic “restrictive” protocol for administration of non-resuscitation fluids was devised based on the most restrictive practice already in place for non-resuscitation fluids at any of the participating centres. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the study and the 30-day mortality was 35%. Patients received a total of 7870 (4060–12,340) ml of non-resuscitation fluids and 2820 (1430–4580) of resuscitation fluids during the observation period. Median volumes of non-resuscitation and resuscitation fluids were similar at day 1 (1620 [710–2320] and 1590 [520–3000]) ml, respectively) and non-resuscitation fluids represented the largest source of fluid from day 2 and onwards after admission to the ICU. Vehicles for drugs such as vasoactive drugs and antibiotics constituted the largest fraction of non-resuscitation fluids (2400 [1270–4030] ml) during the 5-day observation period. Modelling suggested that volume of non-resuscitation fluids could be reduced by 2840 (1270–4900) ml during the first 5 days of admission to the ICU, mainly through reducing maintenance fluids. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the major fraction of fluids administered in the ICU to patients suffering from septic shock and may represent the largest modifiable target to reduce fluid overload.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6881490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68814902019-12-19 Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study Lindén-Søndersø, Anja Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Jan, Mohammed Oscarson, Adam Choi, Sally Kander, Thomas Undén, Johan Griesdale, Donald Boyd, John Bentzer, Peter Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation fluid administered to patients with septic shock. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in eight intensive care units in Sweden and Canada during 4 months in 2018. Adult patients with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the intensive care unit were eligible for inclusion. Non-resuscitation fluids were defined as fluids other than colloids, blood products and crystalloids at a rate ≥ 5 ml/kg/h. Indication, volume and type of fluid were recorded during the first 5 days after admission. A maximum of 30 patients could be included per centre. To estimate the potential to reduce administration of non-resuscitation fluid, a pragmatic “restrictive” protocol for administration of non-resuscitation fluids was devised based on the most restrictive practice already in place for non-resuscitation fluids at any of the participating centres. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the study and the 30-day mortality was 35%. Patients received a total of 7870 (4060–12,340) ml of non-resuscitation fluids and 2820 (1430–4580) of resuscitation fluids during the observation period. Median volumes of non-resuscitation and resuscitation fluids were similar at day 1 (1620 [710–2320] and 1590 [520–3000]) ml, respectively) and non-resuscitation fluids represented the largest source of fluid from day 2 and onwards after admission to the ICU. Vehicles for drugs such as vasoactive drugs and antibiotics constituted the largest fraction of non-resuscitation fluids (2400 [1270–4030] ml) during the 5-day observation period. Modelling suggested that volume of non-resuscitation fluids could be reduced by 2840 (1270–4900) ml during the first 5 days of admission to the ICU, mainly through reducing maintenance fluids. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the major fraction of fluids administered in the ICU to patients suffering from septic shock and may represent the largest modifiable target to reduce fluid overload. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6881490/ /pubmed/31776712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Lindén-Søndersø, Anja
Jungner, Mårten
Spångfors, Martin
Jan, Mohammed
Oscarson, Adam
Choi, Sally
Kander, Thomas
Undén, Johan
Griesdale, Donald
Boyd, John
Bentzer, Peter
Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title_full Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title_fullStr Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title_short Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
title_sort survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lindensøndersøanja surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jungnermarten surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT spangforsmartin surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT janmohammed surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT oscarsonadam surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT choisally surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kanderthomas surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT undenjohan surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT griesdaledonald surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT boydjohn surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bentzerpeter surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy