Cargando…
Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7 |
_version_ | 1783473962161799168 |
---|---|
author | Lindén-Søndersø, Anja Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Jan, Mohammed Oscarson, Adam Choi, Sally Kander, Thomas Undén, Johan Griesdale, Donald Boyd, John Bentzer, Peter |
author_facet | Lindén-Søndersø, Anja Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Jan, Mohammed Oscarson, Adam Choi, Sally Kander, Thomas Undén, Johan Griesdale, Donald Boyd, John Bentzer, Peter |
author_sort | Lindén-Søndersø, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation fluid administered to patients with septic shock. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in eight intensive care units in Sweden and Canada during 4 months in 2018. Adult patients with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the intensive care unit were eligible for inclusion. Non-resuscitation fluids were defined as fluids other than colloids, blood products and crystalloids at a rate ≥ 5 ml/kg/h. Indication, volume and type of fluid were recorded during the first 5 days after admission. A maximum of 30 patients could be included per centre. To estimate the potential to reduce administration of non-resuscitation fluid, a pragmatic “restrictive” protocol for administration of non-resuscitation fluids was devised based on the most restrictive practice already in place for non-resuscitation fluids at any of the participating centres. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the study and the 30-day mortality was 35%. Patients received a total of 7870 (4060–12,340) ml of non-resuscitation fluids and 2820 (1430–4580) of resuscitation fluids during the observation period. Median volumes of non-resuscitation and resuscitation fluids were similar at day 1 (1620 [710–2320] and 1590 [520–3000]) ml, respectively) and non-resuscitation fluids represented the largest source of fluid from day 2 and onwards after admission to the ICU. Vehicles for drugs such as vasoactive drugs and antibiotics constituted the largest fraction of non-resuscitation fluids (2400 [1270–4030] ml) during the 5-day observation period. Modelling suggested that volume of non-resuscitation fluids could be reduced by 2840 (1270–4900) ml during the first 5 days of admission to the ICU, mainly through reducing maintenance fluids. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the major fraction of fluids administered in the ICU to patients suffering from septic shock and may represent the largest modifiable target to reduce fluid overload. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6881490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68814902019-12-19 Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study Lindén-Søndersø, Anja Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Jan, Mohammed Oscarson, Adam Choi, Sally Kander, Thomas Undén, Johan Griesdale, Donald Boyd, John Bentzer, Peter Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The indication, composition and timing of administration of non-resuscitation fluid in septic shock have so far received little attention and accordingly the potential to reduce this source of fluid is unknown. The objective of the study was to quantify and characterize non-resuscitation fluid administered to patients with septic shock. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in eight intensive care units in Sweden and Canada during 4 months in 2018. Adult patients with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the intensive care unit were eligible for inclusion. Non-resuscitation fluids were defined as fluids other than colloids, blood products and crystalloids at a rate ≥ 5 ml/kg/h. Indication, volume and type of fluid were recorded during the first 5 days after admission. A maximum of 30 patients could be included per centre. To estimate the potential to reduce administration of non-resuscitation fluid, a pragmatic “restrictive” protocol for administration of non-resuscitation fluids was devised based on the most restrictive practice already in place for non-resuscitation fluids at any of the participating centres. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in the study and the 30-day mortality was 35%. Patients received a total of 7870 (4060–12,340) ml of non-resuscitation fluids and 2820 (1430–4580) of resuscitation fluids during the observation period. Median volumes of non-resuscitation and resuscitation fluids were similar at day 1 (1620 [710–2320] and 1590 [520–3000]) ml, respectively) and non-resuscitation fluids represented the largest source of fluid from day 2 and onwards after admission to the ICU. Vehicles for drugs such as vasoactive drugs and antibiotics constituted the largest fraction of non-resuscitation fluids (2400 [1270–4030] ml) during the 5-day observation period. Modelling suggested that volume of non-resuscitation fluids could be reduced by 2840 (1270–4900) ml during the first 5 days of admission to the ICU, mainly through reducing maintenance fluids. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the major fraction of fluids administered in the ICU to patients suffering from septic shock and may represent the largest modifiable target to reduce fluid overload. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6881490/ /pubmed/31776712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Lindén-Søndersø, Anja Jungner, Mårten Spångfors, Martin Jan, Mohammed Oscarson, Adam Choi, Sally Kander, Thomas Undén, Johan Griesdale, Donald Boyd, John Bentzer, Peter Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title | Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title_full | Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title_short | Survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
title_sort | survey of non-resuscitation fluids administered during septic shock: a multicenter prospective observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0607-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindensøndersøanja surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT jungnermarten surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT spangforsmartin surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT janmohammed surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT oscarsonadam surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT choisally surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kanderthomas surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT undenjohan surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT griesdaledonald surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT boydjohn surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy AT bentzerpeter surveyofnonresuscitationfluidsadministeredduringsepticshockamulticenterprospectiveobservationalstudy |