Cargando…

A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India

BACKGROUND: In India, most physicians pursue a specialist's degree resulting in a dearth of general practitioners (GPs). To provide primary care across populations and support universal healthcare coverage (UHC), there is a need to develop a core educational foundation for generalists and famil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakshi, Surjeet, Kaljee, Linda, Parke, Dana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803647
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_644_19
_version_ 1783474042910539776
author Bakshi, Surjeet
Kaljee, Linda
Parke, Dana
author_facet Bakshi, Surjeet
Kaljee, Linda
Parke, Dana
author_sort Bakshi, Surjeet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In India, most physicians pursue a specialist's degree resulting in a dearth of general practitioners (GPs). To provide primary care across populations and support universal healthcare coverage (UHC), there is a need to develop a core educational foundation for generalists and family medicine in undergraduate and post-graduate training. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey was conducted as a part of a medical educational needs assessment (ENA) with a focus on family medicine. Respondents included practicing physicians, residents and medical students in Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Tamil Nadu. Descriptive and bi-variate data analysis (Pearson's Chi square, independent t-tests and analysis of variance [ANOVA]) was performed to summarise data and determine significant differences between demographic groups of respondents. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-one surveys were completed. From which, 80.7% (284) of respondents felt that family medicine would be beneficial/very beneficial to the Indian health system. Respondents were split over whether family medicine programmes should be integrated within the existing bachelor of medicine and bachelor of surgery (MBBS) programmes (149/42.5%) or created as a separate post-graduate level specialty (131/37.3%). Overall, 84.2% (292) and 85.4% (294) agreed/strongly agreed that family medicine would benefit specialists and decrease the health disparities. Challenges include lack of information about family medicine and patients’ use of specialists for primary healthcare needs. CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive response to expanding education for generalists and development of family medicine as a specialty in India. Mechanisms to support policies and programmes need to be further explored to ensure successful implementation across the country. Interest in skills-based courses can be an opportunity to provide GP and family medicine training while broader system-level changes are considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6881930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68819302019-12-04 A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India Bakshi, Surjeet Kaljee, Linda Parke, Dana J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: In India, most physicians pursue a specialist's degree resulting in a dearth of general practitioners (GPs). To provide primary care across populations and support universal healthcare coverage (UHC), there is a need to develop a core educational foundation for generalists and family medicine in undergraduate and post-graduate training. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey was conducted as a part of a medical educational needs assessment (ENA) with a focus on family medicine. Respondents included practicing physicians, residents and medical students in Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Tamil Nadu. Descriptive and bi-variate data analysis (Pearson's Chi square, independent t-tests and analysis of variance [ANOVA]) was performed to summarise data and determine significant differences between demographic groups of respondents. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-one surveys were completed. From which, 80.7% (284) of respondents felt that family medicine would be beneficial/very beneficial to the Indian health system. Respondents were split over whether family medicine programmes should be integrated within the existing bachelor of medicine and bachelor of surgery (MBBS) programmes (149/42.5%) or created as a separate post-graduate level specialty (131/37.3%). Overall, 84.2% (292) and 85.4% (294) agreed/strongly agreed that family medicine would benefit specialists and decrease the health disparities. Challenges include lack of information about family medicine and patients’ use of specialists for primary healthcare needs. CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive response to expanding education for generalists and development of family medicine as a specialty in India. Mechanisms to support policies and programmes need to be further explored to ensure successful implementation across the country. Interest in skills-based courses can be an opportunity to provide GP and family medicine training while broader system-level changes are considered. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6881930/ /pubmed/31803647 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_644_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bakshi, Surjeet
Kaljee, Linda
Parke, Dana
A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title_full A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title_fullStr A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title_short A cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: Delhi, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India
title_sort cross-sectional survey on medical education needs of general practitioners and family medicine: delhi, himachal pradesh and tamil nadu, india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6881930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803647
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_644_19
work_keys_str_mv AT bakshisurjeet acrosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia
AT kaljeelinda acrosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia
AT parkedana acrosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia
AT bakshisurjeet crosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia
AT kaljeelinda crosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia
AT parkedana crosssectionalsurveyonmedicaleducationneedsofgeneralpractitionersandfamilymedicinedelhihimachalpradeshandtamilnaduindia