Cargando…
IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6 |
_version_ | 1783474069910323200 |
---|---|
author | Erren, Thomas C. Morfeld, Peter Groß, J. Valérie Wild, Ursula Lewis, Philip |
author_facet | Erren, Thomas C. Morfeld, Peter Groß, J. Valérie Wild, Ursula Lewis, Philip |
author_sort | Erren, Thomas C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that “night shift work” provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6882045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68820452019-12-03 IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? Erren, Thomas C. Morfeld, Peter Groß, J. Valérie Wild, Ursula Lewis, Philip J Occup Med Toxicol Commentary In June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that “night shift work” provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life. BioMed Central 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6882045/ /pubmed/31798667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Erren, Thomas C. Morfeld, Peter Groß, J. Valérie Wild, Ursula Lewis, Philip IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title | IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title_full | IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title_fullStr | IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title_full_unstemmed | IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title_short | IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
title_sort | iarc 2019: “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: what about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT errenthomasc iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife AT morfeldpeter iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife AT großjvalerie iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife AT wildursula iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife AT lewisphilip iarc2019nightshiftworkisprobablycarcinogenicwhataboutdisturbedchronobiologyinallwalksoflife |