Cargando…

A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Different definitions exist for hypotension in children. In this study, we aim to identify evidence-based reference values for low blood pressure and to compare these with existing definitions for systolic hypotension. METHODS: We searched online databases until February 2019 (including...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagedoorn, Nienke N., Zachariasse, Joany M., Moll, Henriette A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2653-9
_version_ 1783474070349676544
author Hagedoorn, Nienke N.
Zachariasse, Joany M.
Moll, Henriette A.
author_facet Hagedoorn, Nienke N.
Zachariasse, Joany M.
Moll, Henriette A.
author_sort Hagedoorn, Nienke N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different definitions exist for hypotension in children. In this study, we aim to identify evidence-based reference values for low blood pressure and to compare these with existing definitions for systolic hypotension. METHODS: We searched online databases until February 2019 (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies that defined age-related centiles (first to fifth centile) for non-invasive systolic blood pressure in healthy children < 18 years. Existing cut-offs for hypotension were identified in international guidelines and textbooks. The age-related centiles and clinical cut-offs were compared and visualized using step charts. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with population-based centiles were selected, of which 2 addressed children < 1 year. Values for the fifth centile differed 8 to 17 mmHg for age. We identified 13 clinical cut-offs of which only 5 reported accurate references. Age-related cut-offs for hypotension showed large variability (ranging from 15 to 30 mmHg). The clinical cut-offs varied in agreement with the low centiles. The definition from Paediatric Advanced Life Support agreed well for children < 12 years but was below the fifth centiles for children > 12 years. For children > 12 years, the definition of Parshuram’s early warning score agreed well, but the Advanced Paediatric Life Support definition was above the fifth centiles. CONCLUSIONS: The different clinical guidelines for low blood pressure show large variability and low to moderate agreement with population-based lower centiles. For children < 12 years, the Paediatric Advanced Life Support definition fits best but it underestimates hypotension in older children. For children > 12 years, the Advanced Paediatric Life Support overestimates hypotension but Parshuram’s cut-off for hypotension in the early warning score agrees well. Future studies should focus on developing reference values for hypotension for acutely ill children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68820472019-12-03 A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review Hagedoorn, Nienke N. Zachariasse, Joany M. Moll, Henriette A. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Different definitions exist for hypotension in children. In this study, we aim to identify evidence-based reference values for low blood pressure and to compare these with existing definitions for systolic hypotension. METHODS: We searched online databases until February 2019 (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies that defined age-related centiles (first to fifth centile) for non-invasive systolic blood pressure in healthy children < 18 years. Existing cut-offs for hypotension were identified in international guidelines and textbooks. The age-related centiles and clinical cut-offs were compared and visualized using step charts. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with population-based centiles were selected, of which 2 addressed children < 1 year. Values for the fifth centile differed 8 to 17 mmHg for age. We identified 13 clinical cut-offs of which only 5 reported accurate references. Age-related cut-offs for hypotension showed large variability (ranging from 15 to 30 mmHg). The clinical cut-offs varied in agreement with the low centiles. The definition from Paediatric Advanced Life Support agreed well for children < 12 years but was below the fifth centiles for children > 12 years. For children > 12 years, the definition of Parshuram’s early warning score agreed well, but the Advanced Paediatric Life Support definition was above the fifth centiles. CONCLUSIONS: The different clinical guidelines for low blood pressure show large variability and low to moderate agreement with population-based lower centiles. For children < 12 years, the Paediatric Advanced Life Support definition fits best but it underestimates hypotension in older children. For children > 12 years, the Advanced Paediatric Life Support overestimates hypotension but Parshuram’s cut-off for hypotension in the early warning score agrees well. Future studies should focus on developing reference values for hypotension for acutely ill children. BioMed Central 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6882047/ /pubmed/31775858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2653-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hagedoorn, Nienke N.
Zachariasse, Joany M.
Moll, Henriette A.
A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title_full A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title_fullStr A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title_short A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
title_sort comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2653-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hagedoornnienken acomparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview
AT zachariassejoanym acomparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview
AT mollhenriettea acomparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview
AT hagedoornnienken comparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview
AT zachariassejoanym comparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview
AT mollhenriettea comparisonofclinicalpaediatricguidelinesforhypotensionwithpopulationbasedlowercentilesasystematicreview