Cargando…
Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The implementation of trauma systems in many high-income countries over the last 50 years has led to important reductions in injury mortality and disability in many healthcare jurisdictions. Injury organizations including the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Association of Can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1239-6 |
_version_ | 1783474095671738368 |
---|---|
author | Batomen, Brice Moore, Lynne Carabali, Mabel Tardif, Pier-Alexandre Champion, Howard Nandi, Arijit |
author_facet | Batomen, Brice Moore, Lynne Carabali, Mabel Tardif, Pier-Alexandre Champion, Howard Nandi, Arijit |
author_sort | Batomen, Brice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The implementation of trauma systems in many high-income countries over the last 50 years has led to important reductions in injury mortality and disability in many healthcare jurisdictions. Injury organizations including the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Association of Canada as well as the World Health Organization provide consensus-based recommendations on resources and processes for optimal injury care. Many hospitals treating trauma patients seek verification to demonstrate that they meet these recommendations. This process may be labeled differently across jurisdictions. In Canada for example, it is called accreditation, but it has the same objective and very similar modalities. The objective of the study described in this protocol is to systematically review evidence on the effectiveness of trauma center verification for improving clinical processes and patient outcomes in injury care. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the association between trauma center verification and hospital mortality (primary outcome), as well as morbidity, resource utilization, and processes of care (secondary outcomes). We will search CINAHL, EMBASE, HealthStar, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases, as well as key injury organization websites for gray literature. We will assess the methodological quality of studies using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. We are planning to conduct a meta-analysis if feasible based on the number of included studies and their heterogeneity. We will evaluate the quality of cumulative evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology. DISCUSSION: This review will provide a synthesis of the body of evidence on trauma center verification effectiveness. Results could reinforce current verification modalities and may suggest ways to optimize them. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at an international clinical conference. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107083. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6882165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68821652019-12-03 Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review Batomen, Brice Moore, Lynne Carabali, Mabel Tardif, Pier-Alexandre Champion, Howard Nandi, Arijit Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The implementation of trauma systems in many high-income countries over the last 50 years has led to important reductions in injury mortality and disability in many healthcare jurisdictions. Injury organizations including the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Association of Canada as well as the World Health Organization provide consensus-based recommendations on resources and processes for optimal injury care. Many hospitals treating trauma patients seek verification to demonstrate that they meet these recommendations. This process may be labeled differently across jurisdictions. In Canada for example, it is called accreditation, but it has the same objective and very similar modalities. The objective of the study described in this protocol is to systematically review evidence on the effectiveness of trauma center verification for improving clinical processes and patient outcomes in injury care. METHODS: We will perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the association between trauma center verification and hospital mortality (primary outcome), as well as morbidity, resource utilization, and processes of care (secondary outcomes). We will search CINAHL, EMBASE, HealthStar, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases, as well as key injury organization websites for gray literature. We will assess the methodological quality of studies using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. We are planning to conduct a meta-analysis if feasible based on the number of included studies and their heterogeneity. We will evaluate the quality of cumulative evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology. DISCUSSION: This review will provide a synthesis of the body of evidence on trauma center verification effectiveness. Results could reinforce current verification modalities and may suggest ways to optimize them. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at an international clinical conference. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107083. BioMed Central 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6882165/ /pubmed/31775895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1239-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Batomen, Brice Moore, Lynne Carabali, Mabel Tardif, Pier-Alexandre Champion, Howard Nandi, Arijit Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title | Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness of trauma centers verification: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1239-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batomenbrice effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview AT moorelynne effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview AT carabalimabel effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview AT tardifpieralexandre effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview AT championhoward effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview AT nandiarijit effectivenessoftraumacentersverificationprotocolforasystematicreview |