Cargando…

Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?

Background: Narratives play a central role in the recovery process following death, and linguistic properties of grief narratives can serve as indicators of adjustment to loss. The present study examined whether bereaved men and women differ in how they discuss their loss, and how linguistic markers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelzer, Eva-Maria, Atkinson, Ciara, O’Connor, Mary-Frances, Croft, Alyssa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1688130
_version_ 1783474168408309760
author Stelzer, Eva-Maria
Atkinson, Ciara
O’Connor, Mary-Frances
Croft, Alyssa
author_facet Stelzer, Eva-Maria
Atkinson, Ciara
O’Connor, Mary-Frances
Croft, Alyssa
author_sort Stelzer, Eva-Maria
collection PubMed
description Background: Narratives play a central role in the recovery process following death, and linguistic properties of grief narratives can serve as indicators of adjustment to loss. The present study examined whether bereaved men and women differ in how they discuss their loss, and how linguistic markers relate to psychological functioning. Positive associations were hypothesized between first-person singular pronoun use and psychological distress. Gender differences were expected for different emotion and social process words, and overall word use. Exploratory analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between linguistic markers and psychosocial outcomes for men and women separately. Method: 50 bereaved widow(er)s and parents (29 women, 21 men; M(Age) = 71.16 years, SD = 9.95) completed psychosocial self-report questionnaires and individual in-depth interviews. Grief narratives were analysed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a software program that quantifies words into linguistic and psychological categories. Results: Contrary to our hypothesis, first-person pronoun use was not related to psychological distress. Although gender differences emerged in self-reported psychosocial outcomes, we failed to find the predicted gender differences in linguistic markers (emotion and social process words, overall word count). Exploratory analyses revealed additional associations between linguistic markers and psychosocial outcomes, and gender differences in these relationships. Notably, first-person pronoun use was related to heightened grief avoidance. Furthermore, various linguistic markers were associated with increased depression levels in females, but not males. In contrast, nonfluencies were positively associated with indicators of psychological distress in men only. Conclusion: In line with the gender similarities hypothesis, analyses suggest similarities between men and women’s discussion of their grief experience. Associations between linguistic markers and psychological adjustment indicate that grief narratives contain meaningful indices of underlying health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68824692019-12-05 Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality? Stelzer, Eva-Maria Atkinson, Ciara O’Connor, Mary-Frances Croft, Alyssa Eur J Psychotraumatol Integrating and Evaluating Sex and Gender in Psychotrauma Research Background: Narratives play a central role in the recovery process following death, and linguistic properties of grief narratives can serve as indicators of adjustment to loss. The present study examined whether bereaved men and women differ in how they discuss their loss, and how linguistic markers relate to psychological functioning. Positive associations were hypothesized between first-person singular pronoun use and psychological distress. Gender differences were expected for different emotion and social process words, and overall word use. Exploratory analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between linguistic markers and psychosocial outcomes for men and women separately. Method: 50 bereaved widow(er)s and parents (29 women, 21 men; M(Age) = 71.16 years, SD = 9.95) completed psychosocial self-report questionnaires and individual in-depth interviews. Grief narratives were analysed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a software program that quantifies words into linguistic and psychological categories. Results: Contrary to our hypothesis, first-person pronoun use was not related to psychological distress. Although gender differences emerged in self-reported psychosocial outcomes, we failed to find the predicted gender differences in linguistic markers (emotion and social process words, overall word count). Exploratory analyses revealed additional associations between linguistic markers and psychosocial outcomes, and gender differences in these relationships. Notably, first-person pronoun use was related to heightened grief avoidance. Furthermore, various linguistic markers were associated with increased depression levels in females, but not males. In contrast, nonfluencies were positively associated with indicators of psychological distress in men only. Conclusion: In line with the gender similarities hypothesis, analyses suggest similarities between men and women’s discussion of their grief experience. Associations between linguistic markers and psychological adjustment indicate that grief narratives contain meaningful indices of underlying health. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6882469/ /pubmed/31807234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1688130 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Integrating and Evaluating Sex and Gender in Psychotrauma Research
Stelzer, Eva-Maria
Atkinson, Ciara
O’Connor, Mary-Frances
Croft, Alyssa
Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title_full Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title_fullStr Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title_short Gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
title_sort gender differences in grief narrative construction: a myth or reality?
topic Integrating and Evaluating Sex and Gender in Psychotrauma Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1688130
work_keys_str_mv AT stelzerevamaria genderdifferencesingriefnarrativeconstructionamythorreality
AT atkinsonciara genderdifferencesingriefnarrativeconstructionamythorreality
AT oconnormaryfrances genderdifferencesingriefnarrativeconstructionamythorreality
AT croftalyssa genderdifferencesingriefnarrativeconstructionamythorreality