Cargando…

Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the patient experience for clinically stable patients presenting with miscarriage to the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory clinics. METHODS: We present a subanalysis of a mixed-methods study from 2016 on factors that influence miscarriage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Carolyn A., Roe, Andrea H., McAllister, Arden, Meisel, Zachary F., Koelper, Nathanael, Schreiber, Courtney A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003571
_version_ 1783474181384437760
author Miller, Carolyn A.
Roe, Andrea H.
McAllister, Arden
Meisel, Zachary F.
Koelper, Nathanael
Schreiber, Courtney A.
author_facet Miller, Carolyn A.
Roe, Andrea H.
McAllister, Arden
Meisel, Zachary F.
Koelper, Nathanael
Schreiber, Courtney A.
author_sort Miller, Carolyn A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the patient experience for clinically stable patients presenting with miscarriage to the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory clinics. METHODS: We present a subanalysis of a mixed-methods study from 2016 on factors that influence miscarriage treatment decision-making among clinically stable patients. Fifty-four patients were evaluated based on location of miscarriage care (ED or ambulatory-only), and novel parameters were assessed including timeline (days) from presentation to miscarriage resolution, number of health system interactions, and number of specialty-based provider care teams seen. We explored themes around patient satisfaction through in-depth narrative interviews. RESULTS: Median time to miscarriage resolution was 11 days (range 5–57) (ED) and 8 days (range 0–47) (ambulatory-only). We recorded a mean of 4.4±1.4 (ED) and 3.0±1.2 (ambulatory-only) separate care teams and a median of 13 (range 8–20) (ED) and 19 (range 8–22) (ambulatory-only) health system interactions. Patients seeking care in the ED were younger (28.3 vs 34.0, odds ratio [OR] 5.8, 95% CI 1.8–18.7), more likely to be of black race (28.3 vs 34.0, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1–10.0), uninsured or insured through Medicaid (16 vs 6, OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.1–22.5), and more likely to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with ambulatory-only patients (10 vs 3, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5–23.4). Patients valued diagnostic clarity, timeliness, and individualized care. We found that ED patients reported a lack of clarity surrounding their diagnosis, inefficient care, and a mixed experience with health care provider sensitivity. In contrast, ambulatory-only patients described a streamlined and sensitive care experience. CONCLUSION: Patients seeking miscarriage care in the ED were more likely to be socioeconomically and psychosocially vulnerable and were less satisfied with their care compared with those seen in the ambulatory setting alone. Expedited evaluation of early pregnancy problems, with attention to clear communication and emotional sensitivity, may optimize the patient experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68825322020-01-22 Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings Miller, Carolyn A. Roe, Andrea H. McAllister, Arden Meisel, Zachary F. Koelper, Nathanael Schreiber, Courtney A. Obstet Gynecol Contents OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the patient experience for clinically stable patients presenting with miscarriage to the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory clinics. METHODS: We present a subanalysis of a mixed-methods study from 2016 on factors that influence miscarriage treatment decision-making among clinically stable patients. Fifty-four patients were evaluated based on location of miscarriage care (ED or ambulatory-only), and novel parameters were assessed including timeline (days) from presentation to miscarriage resolution, number of health system interactions, and number of specialty-based provider care teams seen. We explored themes around patient satisfaction through in-depth narrative interviews. RESULTS: Median time to miscarriage resolution was 11 days (range 5–57) (ED) and 8 days (range 0–47) (ambulatory-only). We recorded a mean of 4.4±1.4 (ED) and 3.0±1.2 (ambulatory-only) separate care teams and a median of 13 (range 8–20) (ED) and 19 (range 8–22) (ambulatory-only) health system interactions. Patients seeking care in the ED were younger (28.3 vs 34.0, odds ratio [OR] 5.8, 95% CI 1.8–18.7), more likely to be of black race (28.3 vs 34.0, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1–10.0), uninsured or insured through Medicaid (16 vs 6, OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.1–22.5), and more likely to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with ambulatory-only patients (10 vs 3, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5–23.4). Patients valued diagnostic clarity, timeliness, and individualized care. We found that ED patients reported a lack of clarity surrounding their diagnosis, inefficient care, and a mixed experience with health care provider sensitivity. In contrast, ambulatory-only patients described a streamlined and sensitive care experience. CONCLUSION: Patients seeking miscarriage care in the ED were more likely to be socioeconomically and psychosocially vulnerable and were less satisfied with their care compared with those seen in the ambulatory setting alone. Expedited evaluation of early pregnancy problems, with attention to clear communication and emotional sensitivity, may optimize the patient experience. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-12 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6882532/ /pubmed/31764740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003571 Text en © 2019 the Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Miller, Carolyn A.
Roe, Andrea H.
McAllister, Arden
Meisel, Zachary F.
Koelper, Nathanael
Schreiber, Courtney A.
Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title_full Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title_fullStr Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title_full_unstemmed Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title_short Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings
title_sort patient experiences with miscarriage management in the emergency and ambulatory settings
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003571
work_keys_str_mv AT millercarolyna patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings
AT roeandreah patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings
AT mcallisterarden patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings
AT meiselzacharyf patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings
AT koelpernathanael patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings
AT schreibercourtneya patientexperienceswithmiscarriagemanagementintheemergencyandambulatorysettings