Cargando…

Impact of early antiretroviral treatment on sexual behaviour: a randomised comparison

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) reduces HIV infectiousness but the effect of early ART on sexual behaviour is unclear. METHODS: We assessed, within the START randomized trial that enrolled HIV-positive adults with CD4(+) cell count greater than 500 cells/μl, the effect of early (immediate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lampe, Fiona C., Rodger, Alison J., Burman, William, Grulich, Andrew, Friedland, Gerald, Sadr, Wafaa El, Neaton, James, Corbelli, Giulio M., Emery, Sean, Molina, Jean Michel, Orkin, Chloe, Gatell, Jose, Gerstoft, Jan, Ruxrungtham, Kiat, Barbosa de Souza, Monica, Phillips, Andrew N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002359
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) reduces HIV infectiousness but the effect of early ART on sexual behaviour is unclear. METHODS: We assessed, within the START randomized trial that enrolled HIV-positive adults with CD4(+) cell count greater than 500 cells/μl, the effect of early (immediate) versus deferred ART on: condomless sex with HIV-serodifferent partners (CLS-D); all condomless sex (CLS); HIV transmission-risk sex (CLS-D-HIV risk, defined as CLS-D and: not on ART or started ART <6 months ago or viral load greater than 200 copies/ml or no viral load in past 6 months), during 2-year follow-up. Month-12 CLS-D (2010–2014) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Among 2562 MSM, there was no difference between immediate and deferred arms in CLS-D at month 12 [12.6 versus 13.1%; difference (95% CI): −0.4% (−3.1 to 2.2%), P = 0.75] or month 24, or in CLS. Among 2010 heterosexual men and women, CLS-D at month 12 tended to be higher in the immediate versus deferred arm [10.8 versus 8.3%; difference:2.5% (−0.1 to 5.2%), P = 0.062]; the difference was greater at month 24 [9.3 versus 5.6%; difference: 3.7% (1.0 to 6.4%), P = 0.007], at which time CLS was higher in the immediate arm (20.7 versus 15.7%, P = 0.013). CLS-D-HIV risk at month 12 was substantially lower in the immediate versus deferred arm for MSM [0.2 versus 11%; difference: −10.7% (−12.5 to −8.9%), P < 0.001] and heterosexuals [0.6% versus 7.7%; difference: −7.0% (−8.8 to −5.3%), P < 0.001], because of viral suppression on ART. CONCLUSION: A strategy of early ART had no effect on condomless sex with HIV-serodifferent partners among MSM, but resulted in modestly higher prevalence among heterosexuals. However, among MSM and heterosexuals, early ART resulted in a substantial reduction in HIV-transmission-risk sex, to a very low absolute level.