Cargando…

The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India

INTRODUCTION: Ambulance-based emergency medical systems (EMS) are expensive and remain rare in low- and middle-income countries, where trauma victims are usually transported to hospital by passing vehicles. Recent developments in transportation network technologies could potentially disrupt this sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhalla, Kavi, Sriram, Veena, Arora, Radhika, Ahuja, Richa, Varghese, Mathew, Agrawal, Girish, Tiwari, Geetam, Mohan, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001963
_version_ 1783474184236564480
author Bhalla, Kavi
Sriram, Veena
Arora, Radhika
Ahuja, Richa
Varghese, Mathew
Agrawal, Girish
Tiwari, Geetam
Mohan, Dinesh
author_facet Bhalla, Kavi
Sriram, Veena
Arora, Radhika
Ahuja, Richa
Varghese, Mathew
Agrawal, Girish
Tiwari, Geetam
Mohan, Dinesh
author_sort Bhalla, Kavi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ambulance-based emergency medical systems (EMS) are expensive and remain rare in low- and middle-income countries, where trauma victims are usually transported to hospital by passing vehicles. Recent developments in transportation network technologies could potentially disrupt this status quo by allowing coordinated emergency response from layperson networks. We sought to understand the barriers to bystander assistance for trauma victims in Delhi, India, and implications for a layperson-EMS. METHODS: We used qualitative methods to analyse data from 50 interviews with frontline stakeholders (including taxi drivers, medical professionals, legal experts and police), one stakeholder consultation and a review of documents. RESULTS: Respondents noted that most trauma victims in Delhi are rapidly brought to hospital by bystanders, taxis and police. While ambulances are common, they are primarily used for interfacility transfers. Entrenched medico-legal practices result in substantial police presence at the hospital, which is a major source of harassment of good Samaritans and interferes with patient care. Trauma victims are often turned away by for-profit hospitals due to their inability to pay, leading to delays in treatment. Recent policy efforts to circumscribe the role of police and force for-profit hospitals to stabilise patients appear to have been unsuccessful. CONCLUSIONS: Existing healthcare and medico-legal practices in India create large systemic impediments to improving trauma outcomes. Until India’s ongoing health and transport sector reforms succeed in ensuring that for-profit hospitals reliably provide care, good Samaritans and layperson-EMS providers should take victims with uncertain financial means to public facilities. To avoid difficulties with police, providers of a layperson-EMS would likely need official police sanction and carry visible symbols of their authority to provide emergency transport. Delhi already has several key components of an EMS (including dispatcher coordinated police response, large ambulance fleet) that could be integrated and expanded into a complete system of emergency care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68825482019-12-04 The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India Bhalla, Kavi Sriram, Veena Arora, Radhika Ahuja, Richa Varghese, Mathew Agrawal, Girish Tiwari, Geetam Mohan, Dinesh BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Ambulance-based emergency medical systems (EMS) are expensive and remain rare in low- and middle-income countries, where trauma victims are usually transported to hospital by passing vehicles. Recent developments in transportation network technologies could potentially disrupt this status quo by allowing coordinated emergency response from layperson networks. We sought to understand the barriers to bystander assistance for trauma victims in Delhi, India, and implications for a layperson-EMS. METHODS: We used qualitative methods to analyse data from 50 interviews with frontline stakeholders (including taxi drivers, medical professionals, legal experts and police), one stakeholder consultation and a review of documents. RESULTS: Respondents noted that most trauma victims in Delhi are rapidly brought to hospital by bystanders, taxis and police. While ambulances are common, they are primarily used for interfacility transfers. Entrenched medico-legal practices result in substantial police presence at the hospital, which is a major source of harassment of good Samaritans and interferes with patient care. Trauma victims are often turned away by for-profit hospitals due to their inability to pay, leading to delays in treatment. Recent policy efforts to circumscribe the role of police and force for-profit hospitals to stabilise patients appear to have been unsuccessful. CONCLUSIONS: Existing healthcare and medico-legal practices in India create large systemic impediments to improving trauma outcomes. Until India’s ongoing health and transport sector reforms succeed in ensuring that for-profit hospitals reliably provide care, good Samaritans and layperson-EMS providers should take victims with uncertain financial means to public facilities. To avoid difficulties with police, providers of a layperson-EMS would likely need official police sanction and carry visible symbols of their authority to provide emergency transport. Delhi already has several key components of an EMS (including dispatcher coordinated police response, large ambulance fleet) that could be integrated and expanded into a complete system of emergency care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6882548/ /pubmed/31803512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Bhalla, Kavi
Sriram, Veena
Arora, Radhika
Ahuja, Richa
Varghese, Mathew
Agrawal, Girish
Tiwari, Geetam
Mohan, Dinesh
The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title_full The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title_fullStr The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title_full_unstemmed The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title_short The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India
title_sort care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in delhi, india
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001963
work_keys_str_mv AT bhallakavi thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT sriramveena thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT aroraradhika thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT ahujaricha thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT varghesemathew thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT agrawalgirish thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT tiwarigeetam thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT mohandinesh thecareandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT bhallakavi careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT sriramveena careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT aroraradhika careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT ahujaricha careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT varghesemathew careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT agrawalgirish careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT tiwarigeetam careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia
AT mohandinesh careandtransportoftraumavictimsbylaypersonemergencymedicalsystemsaqualitativestudyindelhiindia