Cargando…

Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique

BACKGROUND: Poor patient experience, including long waiting time, is a potential reason for low healthcare utilisation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care. METHODS: We implemented a pilot study in Mozambique introducing a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenland, Maria, Dula, Janeth, de Albuquerque, Amanda, Fernandes, Quinhas, Cuco, Rosa Marlene, Chicumbe, Sergio, Gudo, Eduardo Samo, Sequeira, Sandra, McConnell, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001788
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Poor patient experience, including long waiting time, is a potential reason for low healthcare utilisation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care. METHODS: We implemented a pilot study in Mozambique introducing appointment scheduling to three maternity clinics, with a fourth facility used as a comparison. The intervention provided women with a return date and time for their next antenatal care visit. Waiting times and antenatal care utilisation data were collected in all study facilities. We assessed the effect of changing from first come, first served to scheduled antenatal care visits on waiting time and complete antenatal care (≥4 visits during pregnancy). Our primary analysis compared treatment facilities over time; in addition, we compared the treatment and comparison facilities using difference in differences. RESULTS: We collected waiting time data for antenatal care from 6918 women, and antenatal care attendance over the course of pregnancy from 8385 women. Scheduling appointments reduced waiting time for antenatal care in treatment facilities by 100 min (95% CI −107.2 to -92.9) compared with baseline. Using administrative records, we found that exposure to the scheduling intervention during pregnancy was associated with an approximately 16 percentage point increase in receipt of four or more antenatal care visits during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively simple improvements in the organisation of care that reduce waiting time may increase utilisation of healthcare during pregnancy. A larger scale study is needed to provide information about whether appointment scheduling can be sustained over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02938936.