Cargando…

Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique

BACKGROUND: Poor patient experience, including long waiting time, is a potential reason for low healthcare utilisation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care. METHODS: We implemented a pilot study in Mozambique introducing a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenland, Maria, Dula, Janeth, de Albuquerque, Amanda, Fernandes, Quinhas, Cuco, Rosa Marlene, Chicumbe, Sergio, Gudo, Eduardo Samo, Sequeira, Sandra, McConnell, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001788
_version_ 1783474184932818944
author Steenland, Maria
Dula, Janeth
de Albuquerque, Amanda
Fernandes, Quinhas
Cuco, Rosa Marlene
Chicumbe, Sergio
Gudo, Eduardo Samo
Sequeira, Sandra
McConnell, Margaret
author_facet Steenland, Maria
Dula, Janeth
de Albuquerque, Amanda
Fernandes, Quinhas
Cuco, Rosa Marlene
Chicumbe, Sergio
Gudo, Eduardo Samo
Sequeira, Sandra
McConnell, Margaret
author_sort Steenland, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor patient experience, including long waiting time, is a potential reason for low healthcare utilisation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care. METHODS: We implemented a pilot study in Mozambique introducing appointment scheduling to three maternity clinics, with a fourth facility used as a comparison. The intervention provided women with a return date and time for their next antenatal care visit. Waiting times and antenatal care utilisation data were collected in all study facilities. We assessed the effect of changing from first come, first served to scheduled antenatal care visits on waiting time and complete antenatal care (≥4 visits during pregnancy). Our primary analysis compared treatment facilities over time; in addition, we compared the treatment and comparison facilities using difference in differences. RESULTS: We collected waiting time data for antenatal care from 6918 women, and antenatal care attendance over the course of pregnancy from 8385 women. Scheduling appointments reduced waiting time for antenatal care in treatment facilities by 100 min (95% CI −107.2 to -92.9) compared with baseline. Using administrative records, we found that exposure to the scheduling intervention during pregnancy was associated with an approximately 16 percentage point increase in receipt of four or more antenatal care visits during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively simple improvements in the organisation of care that reduce waiting time may increase utilisation of healthcare during pregnancy. A larger scale study is needed to provide information about whether appointment scheduling can be sustained over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02938936.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68825512019-12-04 Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique Steenland, Maria Dula, Janeth de Albuquerque, Amanda Fernandes, Quinhas Cuco, Rosa Marlene Chicumbe, Sergio Gudo, Eduardo Samo Sequeira, Sandra McConnell, Margaret BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: Poor patient experience, including long waiting time, is a potential reason for low healthcare utilisation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care. METHODS: We implemented a pilot study in Mozambique introducing appointment scheduling to three maternity clinics, with a fourth facility used as a comparison. The intervention provided women with a return date and time for their next antenatal care visit. Waiting times and antenatal care utilisation data were collected in all study facilities. We assessed the effect of changing from first come, first served to scheduled antenatal care visits on waiting time and complete antenatal care (≥4 visits during pregnancy). Our primary analysis compared treatment facilities over time; in addition, we compared the treatment and comparison facilities using difference in differences. RESULTS: We collected waiting time data for antenatal care from 6918 women, and antenatal care attendance over the course of pregnancy from 8385 women. Scheduling appointments reduced waiting time for antenatal care in treatment facilities by 100 min (95% CI −107.2 to -92.9) compared with baseline. Using administrative records, we found that exposure to the scheduling intervention during pregnancy was associated with an approximately 16 percentage point increase in receipt of four or more antenatal care visits during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively simple improvements in the organisation of care that reduce waiting time may increase utilisation of healthcare during pregnancy. A larger scale study is needed to provide information about whether appointment scheduling can be sustained over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02938936. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6882551/ /pubmed/31803509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001788 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Steenland, Maria
Dula, Janeth
de Albuquerque, Amanda
Fernandes, Quinhas
Cuco, Rosa Marlene
Chicumbe, Sergio
Gudo, Eduardo Samo
Sequeira, Sandra
McConnell, Margaret
Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title_full Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title_fullStr Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title_full_unstemmed Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title_short Effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in Mozambique
title_sort effects of appointment scheduling on waiting time and utilisation of antenatal care in mozambique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001788
work_keys_str_mv AT steenlandmaria effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT dulajaneth effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT dealbuquerqueamanda effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT fernandesquinhas effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT cucorosamarlene effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT chicumbesergio effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT gudoeduardosamo effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT sequeirasandra effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique
AT mcconnellmargaret effectsofappointmentschedulingonwaitingtimeandutilisationofantenatalcareinmozambique