Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and sa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054 |
_version_ | 1783474210636562432 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Bi-Cheng Zhang, Zhan-Jie Fu, Chen Wang, Chang |
author_facet | Wang, Bi-Cheng Zhang, Zhan-Jie Fu, Chen Wang, Chang |
author_sort | Wang, Bi-Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents is critical for clinical practice. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefit and risk of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases were searched up to Jun 16, 2019. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Second outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events. RESULTS: Six studies were assessed for inclusion in the final synthesis, of which 5 were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS was, respectively, 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–1.15, P = .93) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.38–1.81, P < .001) after treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, the pooled ORR was 9.9% (95% CI: 4.4%–15.5%) and the pooled DCR was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.8%–39.9%). Sub-analysis for treatment related adverse events indicated that fatigue was the most common toxicity in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (incidence 10.6%, 95% CI: 5.6%–15.6%). CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to improve the antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients. However, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not result in a relative improvement in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6882659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68826592020-01-22 Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Bi-Cheng Zhang, Zhan-Jie Fu, Chen Wang, Chang Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents is critical for clinical practice. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefit and risk of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases were searched up to Jun 16, 2019. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Second outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events. RESULTS: Six studies were assessed for inclusion in the final synthesis, of which 5 were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS was, respectively, 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–1.15, P = .93) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.38–1.81, P < .001) after treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, the pooled ORR was 9.9% (95% CI: 4.4%–15.5%) and the pooled DCR was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.8%–39.9%). Sub-analysis for treatment related adverse events indicated that fatigue was the most common toxicity in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (incidence 10.6%, 95% CI: 5.6%–15.6%). CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to improve the antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients. However, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not result in a relative improvement in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6882659/ /pubmed/31764833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Wang, Bi-Cheng Zhang, Zhan-Jie Fu, Chen Wang, Chang Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of anti-pd-1/pd-l1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbicheng efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhanjie efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fuchen efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangchang efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |