Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bi-Cheng, Zhang, Zhan-Jie, Fu, Chen, Wang, Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054
_version_ 1783474210636562432
author Wang, Bi-Cheng
Zhang, Zhan-Jie
Fu, Chen
Wang, Chang
author_facet Wang, Bi-Cheng
Zhang, Zhan-Jie
Fu, Chen
Wang, Chang
author_sort Wang, Bi-Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents is critical for clinical practice. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefit and risk of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases were searched up to Jun 16, 2019. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Second outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events. RESULTS: Six studies were assessed for inclusion in the final synthesis, of which 5 were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS was, respectively, 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–1.15, P = .93) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.38–1.81, P < .001) after treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, the pooled ORR was 9.9% (95% CI: 4.4%–15.5%) and the pooled DCR was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.8%–39.9%). Sub-analysis for treatment related adverse events indicated that fatigue was the most common toxicity in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (incidence 10.6%, 95% CI: 5.6%–15.6%). CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to improve the antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients. However, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not result in a relative improvement in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68826592020-01-22 Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Bi-Cheng Zhang, Zhan-Jie Fu, Chen Wang, Chang Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic options have limited efficacy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibition now has been increasingly used in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer therapy. To further understand the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents is critical for clinical practice. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the benefit and risk of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases were searched up to Jun 16, 2019. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS). Second outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events. RESULTS: Six studies were assessed for inclusion in the final synthesis, of which 5 were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS was, respectively, 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–1.15, P = .93) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.38–1.81, P < .001) after treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, the pooled ORR was 9.9% (95% CI: 4.4%–15.5%) and the pooled DCR was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.8%–39.9%). Sub-analysis for treatment related adverse events indicated that fatigue was the most common toxicity in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (incidence 10.6%, 95% CI: 5.6%–15.6%). CONCLUSION: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to improve the antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients. However, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not result in a relative improvement in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6882659/ /pubmed/31764833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Wang, Bi-Cheng
Zhang, Zhan-Jie
Fu, Chen
Wang, Chang
Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of anti-pd-1/pd-l1 agents vs chemotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018054
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbicheng efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhanjie efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fuchen efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchang efficacyandsafetyofantipd1pdl1agentsvschemotherapyinpatientswithgastricorgastroesophagealjunctioncancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis