Cargando…

Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study

INTRODUCTION: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in people with breast cancer affects treatment recovery, quality of life, service utilisation and relationships. Our aim was to investigate how specialist breast cancer nurses (SBCN) respond to their patients’ fears of cancer recurrence and analyse SBCN’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruickshank, Susanne, Steel, Emma, Fenlon, Deborah, Armes, Jo, Banks, Elspeth, Humphris, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9
_version_ 1783474227846840320
author Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
author_facet Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
author_sort Cruickshank, Susanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in people with breast cancer affects treatment recovery, quality of life, service utilisation and relationships. Our aim was to investigate how specialist breast cancer nurses (SBCN) respond to their patients’ fears of cancer recurrence and analyse SBCN’s views about embedding a new psychological intervention, the Mini-AFTERc, into their consultations. METHOD: A mixed methods sequential design was used, informed by normalisation process theory. Phase 1: UK SBCNs were emailed a web-based survey to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FCR is currently identified and managed, and their willingness to utilise the Mini-AFTERc. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) were interviewed to augment phase 1 responses, and explore views on the importance of addressing FCR, interest in the Mini-AFTERc intervention, its content, skills required and challenges to delivering the intervention. RESULTS: Ninety nurses responded to the survey. When SBCN’s were asked to identify the proportion of patients experiencing FCR in their caseload, there was no consensus on the size of the problem or unmet need. They estimated that 20–100% people experience moderate FCR and 10–70% severe FCR. The interviews identified that clinical conversations are focused primarily on giving information about signs and symptoms of recurrence rather than addressing the psychological aspects of fear. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate wide variability in how FCR was identified, assessed and supported by a sample of UK SBCNs. The introduction of a structured intervention into practice was viewed favourably and has implications for nursing and health professional ways of working in all cancer services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68827482019-12-12 Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study Cruickshank, Susanne Steel, Emma Fenlon, Deborah Armes, Jo Banks, Elspeth Humphris, Gerald Support Care Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in people with breast cancer affects treatment recovery, quality of life, service utilisation and relationships. Our aim was to investigate how specialist breast cancer nurses (SBCN) respond to their patients’ fears of cancer recurrence and analyse SBCN’s views about embedding a new psychological intervention, the Mini-AFTERc, into their consultations. METHOD: A mixed methods sequential design was used, informed by normalisation process theory. Phase 1: UK SBCNs were emailed a web-based survey to investigate how breast cancer survivors’ FCR is currently identified and managed, and their willingness to utilise the Mini-AFTERc. Phase 2: a purposive sample of respondents (n = 20) were interviewed to augment phase 1 responses, and explore views on the importance of addressing FCR, interest in the Mini-AFTERc intervention, its content, skills required and challenges to delivering the intervention. RESULTS: Ninety nurses responded to the survey. When SBCN’s were asked to identify the proportion of patients experiencing FCR in their caseload, there was no consensus on the size of the problem or unmet need. They estimated that 20–100% people experience moderate FCR and 10–70% severe FCR. The interviews identified that clinical conversations are focused primarily on giving information about signs and symptoms of recurrence rather than addressing the psychological aspects of fear. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate wide variability in how FCR was identified, assessed and supported by a sample of UK SBCNs. The introduction of a structured intervention into practice was viewed favourably and has implications for nursing and health professional ways of working in all cancer services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-17 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6882748/ /pubmed/30997595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cruickshank, Susanne
Steel, Emma
Fenlon, Deborah
Armes, Jo
Banks, Elspeth
Humphris, Gerald
Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title_full Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title_short Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
title_sort specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9
work_keys_str_mv AT cruickshanksusanne specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT steelemma specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT fenlondeborah specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT armesjo specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT bankselspeth specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy
AT humphrisgerald specialistbreastcancernursesviewsonimplementingafearofcancerrecurrenceinterventioninpracticeamixedmethodsstudy