Cargando…

Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback

Feedback is a key factor in acquiring breaking bad news (BBN) communication skills and its’ acceptance depends on the perceived credibility of the provider. Our aim was to investigate students’ opinions on the provided feedback by different educators (surgeons, psychologists, and simulated patient (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brouwers, Marianne, van Weel, Chris, Laan, Roland, van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1415-8
_version_ 1783474230680092672
author Brouwers, Marianne
van Weel, Chris
Laan, Roland
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
author_facet Brouwers, Marianne
van Weel, Chris
Laan, Roland
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
author_sort Brouwers, Marianne
collection PubMed
description Feedback is a key factor in acquiring breaking bad news (BBN) communication skills and its’ acceptance depends on the perceived credibility of the provider. Our aim was to investigate students’ opinions on the provided feedback by different educators (surgeons, psychologists, and simulated patient (SP)) during BBN skills training. We developed a questionnaire investigating provided feedback by the surgeon, psychologist, and SP (yes or no statements), regarding (1) perceived safety of the atmosphere, (2) perceived positive feedback, (3) perceived specific feedback, and (4) perceived usefulness for improvement during BBN skills training. Five hundred twenty students returned the questionnaire after BBN skills training. Most students rated the feedback as positive, specific, and useful. Also, the atmosphere was considered safe. Feedback ratings of the SP were the same as for the surgeon and valued higher than for the psychologist. An unsafe atmosphere, or not receiving positive, specific, or useful feedback was mostly related to the psychologist’s feedback. Feedback on BBN skills training by surgeons and SPs is rated equally helpful by students and is regarded specific, useful, and positive. When designing a BBN training, it is worth to consider involving SP’s as well as clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6882760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68827602019-12-12 Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback Brouwers, Marianne van Weel, Chris Laan, Roland van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn J Cancer Educ Article Feedback is a key factor in acquiring breaking bad news (BBN) communication skills and its’ acceptance depends on the perceived credibility of the provider. Our aim was to investigate students’ opinions on the provided feedback by different educators (surgeons, psychologists, and simulated patient (SP)) during BBN skills training. We developed a questionnaire investigating provided feedback by the surgeon, psychologist, and SP (yes or no statements), regarding (1) perceived safety of the atmosphere, (2) perceived positive feedback, (3) perceived specific feedback, and (4) perceived usefulness for improvement during BBN skills training. Five hundred twenty students returned the questionnaire after BBN skills training. Most students rated the feedback as positive, specific, and useful. Also, the atmosphere was considered safe. Feedback ratings of the SP were the same as for the surgeon and valued higher than for the psychologist. An unsafe atmosphere, or not receiving positive, specific, or useful feedback was mostly related to the psychologist’s feedback. Feedback on BBN skills training by surgeons and SPs is rated equally helpful by students and is regarded specific, useful, and positive. When designing a BBN training, it is worth to consider involving SP’s as well as clinicians. Springer US 2018-08-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6882760/ /pubmed/30128954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1415-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication August/2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Brouwers, Marianne
van Weel, Chris
Laan, Roland
van Weel-Baumgarten, Evelyn
Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title_full Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title_fullStr Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title_full_unstemmed Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title_short Training Undergraduates Skills in Breaking Bad News: How Students Value Educators’ Feedback
title_sort training undergraduates skills in breaking bad news: how students value educators’ feedback
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1415-8
work_keys_str_mv AT brouwersmarianne trainingundergraduatesskillsinbreakingbadnewshowstudentsvalueeducatorsfeedback
AT vanweelchris trainingundergraduatesskillsinbreakingbadnewshowstudentsvalueeducatorsfeedback
AT laanroland trainingundergraduatesskillsinbreakingbadnewshowstudentsvalueeducatorsfeedback
AT vanweelbaumgartenevelyn trainingundergraduatesskillsinbreakingbadnewshowstudentsvalueeducatorsfeedback