Cargando…
Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia
We evaluated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in two different montages could improve picture naming abilities in participants with anomic Alzheimer Disease or Frontotemporal dementia. METHODS: Utilizing a double-blind cross-over design, twelve participants were trained on pict...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01231 |
_version_ | 1783474272942948352 |
---|---|
author | Roncero, Carlos Service, Erik De Caro, Marco Popov, Aleksandar Thiel, Alexander Probst, Stephan Chertkow, Howard |
author_facet | Roncero, Carlos Service, Erik De Caro, Marco Popov, Aleksandar Thiel, Alexander Probst, Stephan Chertkow, Howard |
author_sort | Roncero, Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in two different montages could improve picture naming abilities in participants with anomic Alzheimer Disease or Frontotemporal dementia. METHODS: Utilizing a double-blind cross-over design, twelve participants were trained on picture naming over a series of 10 sessions with 30 min of anodal (2 mA) tDCS stimulation to either the left inferior parietotemporal region (P3), the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3), or sham stimulation. We evaluated performance on a trained picture naming list, an equivalent novel untrained list, and additional neuropsychological tasks. RESULTS: For trained item picture naming, significantly larger improvement was seen for real stimulation vs. sham stimulation for both the DLPFC and left inferior parieto-temporal stimulation montages at the end of the stimulation sessions. The parieto-temporal montage remained superior to sham 2 weeks poststimulation. Significant improvement vs. sham was also seen for novel “untrained” item picture naming 2 weeks post-stimulation when the parieto-temporal montage was given, whereas no change was observed when the DLPFC montage was given. Finally, comparing groups when they received the parieto-temporal montage, participants with semantic variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) showed the least improvement for untrained items after their sessions. Scores on the additional neuropsychological tasks were unchanged. CONCLUSION: tDCS stimulation has promise as a treatment for individuals with anomia arising from neurodegenerative disease, but its effectiveness can vary depending on the training given, the montage location used, as well as a participants’ diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6882938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68829382019-12-10 Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia Roncero, Carlos Service, Erik De Caro, Marco Popov, Aleksandar Thiel, Alexander Probst, Stephan Chertkow, Howard Front Neurosci Neuroscience We evaluated whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in two different montages could improve picture naming abilities in participants with anomic Alzheimer Disease or Frontotemporal dementia. METHODS: Utilizing a double-blind cross-over design, twelve participants were trained on picture naming over a series of 10 sessions with 30 min of anodal (2 mA) tDCS stimulation to either the left inferior parietotemporal region (P3), the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3), or sham stimulation. We evaluated performance on a trained picture naming list, an equivalent novel untrained list, and additional neuropsychological tasks. RESULTS: For trained item picture naming, significantly larger improvement was seen for real stimulation vs. sham stimulation for both the DLPFC and left inferior parieto-temporal stimulation montages at the end of the stimulation sessions. The parieto-temporal montage remained superior to sham 2 weeks poststimulation. Significant improvement vs. sham was also seen for novel “untrained” item picture naming 2 weeks post-stimulation when the parieto-temporal montage was given, whereas no change was observed when the DLPFC montage was given. Finally, comparing groups when they received the parieto-temporal montage, participants with semantic variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) showed the least improvement for untrained items after their sessions. Scores on the additional neuropsychological tasks were unchanged. CONCLUSION: tDCS stimulation has promise as a treatment for individuals with anomia arising from neurodegenerative disease, but its effectiveness can vary depending on the training given, the montage location used, as well as a participants’ diagnosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6882938/ /pubmed/31824242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01231 Text en Copyright © 2019 Roncero, Service, De Caro, Popov, Thiel, Probst and Chertkow. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Roncero, Carlos Service, Erik De Caro, Marco Popov, Aleksandar Thiel, Alexander Probst, Stephan Chertkow, Howard Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title | Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title_full | Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title_fullStr | Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title_full_unstemmed | Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title_short | Maximizing the Treatment Benefit of tDCS in Neurodegenerative Anomia |
title_sort | maximizing the treatment benefit of tdcs in neurodegenerative anomia |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roncerocarlos maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT serviceerik maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT decaromarco maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT popovaleksandar maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT thielalexander maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT probststephan maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia AT chertkowhoward maximizingthetreatmentbenefitoftdcsinneurodegenerativeanomia |