Cargando…
Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment effic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824412 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239 |
_version_ | 1783474280594407424 |
---|---|
author | Schlemm, Ludwig Kufner, Anna Boutitie, Florent Nave, Alexander Heinrich Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Simonsen, Claus Z. Ford, Ian Lemmens, Robin Muir, Keith W. Nighoghossian, Norbert Pedraza, Salvador Ebinger, Martin Endres, Matthias |
author_facet | Schlemm, Ludwig Kufner, Anna Boutitie, Florent Nave, Alexander Heinrich Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Simonsen, Claus Z. Ford, Ian Lemmens, Robin Muir, Keith W. Nighoghossian, Norbert Pedraza, Salvador Ebinger, Martin Endres, Matthias |
author_sort | Schlemm, Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis are scarce. Methods: We performed a pre-specified post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial that randomized AIS patients with unknown time of symptom onset who had diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch to either alteplase or placebo. Patients were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers (including former smokers and never-smokers). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as clinical and imaging follow-up data were analyzed according to smoking status. Results: Four hundred and eighty six patients were included in the analysis. Current smokers (133, 27.4%) were younger (60.1 ± 13.0 vs. 67.2 ± 10.3 years; p < 0.001) and less often had arterial hypertension (45.0% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.02) or atrial fibrillation (3.8% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.001). The acute stroke presentation was more often due to large vessel occlusion among current smokers (27.1 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.01), and smokers had a trend towards more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score>10 in 27.1% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.08). The treatment effect of alteplase, quantified as odds ratio for a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 90 days of 0 or 1), did not differ between current smokers and non-smokers (p-value for interaction: 0.59). After adjustment for age and stroke severity, neither the proportion of patients with favorable outcome, nor the median mRS score at 90 days differed between current smokers and non-smokers. When additional potential confounders were included in the model, the median mRS score was higher in current smokers than in non-smokers (cOR of better outcome for current smokers vs. non-smokers: 0.664 [0.451–0.978], p = 0.04). Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate MRI-proven AIS and unknown time of symptom onset with DWI-FLAIR mismatch, current smokers had worse functional outcome as compared to non-smokers. Current smoking did not modify the treatment effect of alteplase. Clinical Trial registration: Main trial (WAKE-UP): ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01525290; and EudraCT, 2011-005906-32. Registered 02 February 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6883001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68830012019-12-10 Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial Schlemm, Ludwig Kufner, Anna Boutitie, Florent Nave, Alexander Heinrich Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Simonsen, Claus Z. Ford, Ian Lemmens, Robin Muir, Keith W. Nighoghossian, Norbert Pedraza, Salvador Ebinger, Martin Endres, Matthias Front Neurol Neurology Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis are scarce. Methods: We performed a pre-specified post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial that randomized AIS patients with unknown time of symptom onset who had diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch to either alteplase or placebo. Patients were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers (including former smokers and never-smokers). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as clinical and imaging follow-up data were analyzed according to smoking status. Results: Four hundred and eighty six patients were included in the analysis. Current smokers (133, 27.4%) were younger (60.1 ± 13.0 vs. 67.2 ± 10.3 years; p < 0.001) and less often had arterial hypertension (45.0% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.02) or atrial fibrillation (3.8% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.001). The acute stroke presentation was more often due to large vessel occlusion among current smokers (27.1 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.01), and smokers had a trend towards more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score>10 in 27.1% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.08). The treatment effect of alteplase, quantified as odds ratio for a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 90 days of 0 or 1), did not differ between current smokers and non-smokers (p-value for interaction: 0.59). After adjustment for age and stroke severity, neither the proportion of patients with favorable outcome, nor the median mRS score at 90 days differed between current smokers and non-smokers. When additional potential confounders were included in the model, the median mRS score was higher in current smokers than in non-smokers (cOR of better outcome for current smokers vs. non-smokers: 0.664 [0.451–0.978], p = 0.04). Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate MRI-proven AIS and unknown time of symptom onset with DWI-FLAIR mismatch, current smokers had worse functional outcome as compared to non-smokers. Current smoking did not modify the treatment effect of alteplase. Clinical Trial registration: Main trial (WAKE-UP): ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01525290; and EudraCT, 2011-005906-32. Registered 02 February 2012. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6883001/ /pubmed/31824412 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239 Text en Copyright © 2019 Schlemm, Kufner, Boutitie, Nave, Gerloff, Thomalla, Simonsen, Ford, Lemmens, Muir, Nighoghossian, Pedraza, Ebinger and Endres. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Schlemm, Ludwig Kufner, Anna Boutitie, Florent Nave, Alexander Heinrich Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Simonsen, Claus Z. Ford, Ian Lemmens, Robin Muir, Keith W. Nighoghossian, Norbert Pedraza, Salvador Ebinger, Martin Endres, Matthias Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title | Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title_full | Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title_fullStr | Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title_short | Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial |
title_sort | current smoking does not modify the treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients—a post-hoc analysis of the wake-up trial |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824412 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlemmludwig currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT kufneranna currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT boutitieflorent currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT navealexanderheinrich currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT gerloffchristian currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT thomallagotz currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT simonsenclausz currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT fordian currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT lemmensrobin currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT muirkeithw currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT nighoghossiannorbert currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT pedrazasalvador currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT ebingermartin currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial AT endresmatthias currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial |