Cargando…

Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial

Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment effic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlemm, Ludwig, Kufner, Anna, Boutitie, Florent, Nave, Alexander Heinrich, Gerloff, Christian, Thomalla, Götz, Simonsen, Claus Z., Ford, Ian, Lemmens, Robin, Muir, Keith W., Nighoghossian, Norbert, Pedraza, Salvador, Ebinger, Martin, Endres, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824412
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239
_version_ 1783474280594407424
author Schlemm, Ludwig
Kufner, Anna
Boutitie, Florent
Nave, Alexander Heinrich
Gerloff, Christian
Thomalla, Götz
Simonsen, Claus Z.
Ford, Ian
Lemmens, Robin
Muir, Keith W.
Nighoghossian, Norbert
Pedraza, Salvador
Ebinger, Martin
Endres, Matthias
author_facet Schlemm, Ludwig
Kufner, Anna
Boutitie, Florent
Nave, Alexander Heinrich
Gerloff, Christian
Thomalla, Götz
Simonsen, Claus Z.
Ford, Ian
Lemmens, Robin
Muir, Keith W.
Nighoghossian, Norbert
Pedraza, Salvador
Ebinger, Martin
Endres, Matthias
author_sort Schlemm, Ludwig
collection PubMed
description Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis are scarce. Methods: We performed a pre-specified post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial that randomized AIS patients with unknown time of symptom onset who had diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch to either alteplase or placebo. Patients were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers (including former smokers and never-smokers). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as clinical and imaging follow-up data were analyzed according to smoking status. Results: Four hundred and eighty six patients were included in the analysis. Current smokers (133, 27.4%) were younger (60.1 ± 13.0 vs. 67.2 ± 10.3 years; p < 0.001) and less often had arterial hypertension (45.0% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.02) or atrial fibrillation (3.8% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.001). The acute stroke presentation was more often due to large vessel occlusion among current smokers (27.1 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.01), and smokers had a trend towards more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score>10 in 27.1% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.08). The treatment effect of alteplase, quantified as odds ratio for a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 90 days of 0 or 1), did not differ between current smokers and non-smokers (p-value for interaction: 0.59). After adjustment for age and stroke severity, neither the proportion of patients with favorable outcome, nor the median mRS score at 90 days differed between current smokers and non-smokers. When additional potential confounders were included in the model, the median mRS score was higher in current smokers than in non-smokers (cOR of better outcome for current smokers vs. non-smokers: 0.664 [0.451–0.978], p = 0.04). Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate MRI-proven AIS and unknown time of symptom onset with DWI-FLAIR mismatch, current smokers had worse functional outcome as compared to non-smokers. Current smoking did not modify the treatment effect of alteplase. Clinical Trial registration: Main trial (WAKE-UP): ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01525290; and EudraCT, 2011-005906-32. Registered 02 February 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6883001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68830012019-12-10 Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial Schlemm, Ludwig Kufner, Anna Boutitie, Florent Nave, Alexander Heinrich Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Simonsen, Claus Z. Ford, Ian Lemmens, Robin Muir, Keith W. Nighoghossian, Norbert Pedraza, Salvador Ebinger, Martin Endres, Matthias Front Neurol Neurology Background: The “smoking paradox” indicates that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who smoke at the time of their stroke may have a better prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis than non-smokers. However, findings are inconsistent and data analyzing the effect of smoking on treatment efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis are scarce. Methods: We performed a pre-specified post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial that randomized AIS patients with unknown time of symptom onset who had diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuation inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch to either alteplase or placebo. Patients were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers (including former smokers and never-smokers). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as clinical and imaging follow-up data were analyzed according to smoking status. Results: Four hundred and eighty six patients were included in the analysis. Current smokers (133, 27.4%) were younger (60.1 ± 13.0 vs. 67.2 ± 10.3 years; p < 0.001) and less often had arterial hypertension (45.0% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.02) or atrial fibrillation (3.8% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.001). The acute stroke presentation was more often due to large vessel occlusion among current smokers (27.1 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.01), and smokers had a trend towards more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score>10 in 27.1% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.08). The treatment effect of alteplase, quantified as odds ratio for a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score at 90 days of 0 or 1), did not differ between current smokers and non-smokers (p-value for interaction: 0.59). After adjustment for age and stroke severity, neither the proportion of patients with favorable outcome, nor the median mRS score at 90 days differed between current smokers and non-smokers. When additional potential confounders were included in the model, the median mRS score was higher in current smokers than in non-smokers (cOR of better outcome for current smokers vs. non-smokers: 0.664 [0.451–0.978], p = 0.04). Conclusions: In patients with mild to moderate MRI-proven AIS and unknown time of symptom onset with DWI-FLAIR mismatch, current smokers had worse functional outcome as compared to non-smokers. Current smoking did not modify the treatment effect of alteplase. Clinical Trial registration: Main trial (WAKE-UP): ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01525290; and EudraCT, 2011-005906-32. Registered 02 February 2012. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6883001/ /pubmed/31824412 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239 Text en Copyright © 2019 Schlemm, Kufner, Boutitie, Nave, Gerloff, Thomalla, Simonsen, Ford, Lemmens, Muir, Nighoghossian, Pedraza, Ebinger and Endres. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Schlemm, Ludwig
Kufner, Anna
Boutitie, Florent
Nave, Alexander Heinrich
Gerloff, Christian
Thomalla, Götz
Simonsen, Claus Z.
Ford, Ian
Lemmens, Robin
Muir, Keith W.
Nighoghossian, Norbert
Pedraza, Salvador
Ebinger, Martin
Endres, Matthias
Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title_full Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title_fullStr Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title_full_unstemmed Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title_short Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients—A Post-hoc Analysis of the WAKE-UP Trial
title_sort current smoking does not modify the treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients—a post-hoc analysis of the wake-up trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824412
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01239
work_keys_str_mv AT schlemmludwig currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT kufneranna currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT boutitieflorent currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT navealexanderheinrich currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT gerloffchristian currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT thomallagotz currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT simonsenclausz currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT fordian currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT lemmensrobin currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT muirkeithw currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT nighoghossiannorbert currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT pedrazasalvador currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT ebingermartin currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial
AT endresmatthias currentsmokingdoesnotmodifythetreatmenteffectofintravenousthrombolysisinacuteischemicstrokepatientsaposthocanalysisofthewakeuptrial