Cargando…
Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon. Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) is still controversial. AIM: To compare the p...
Autores principales: | Yang, Jiao, Chen, Ling, Ge, Ke, Yang, Jian-Le |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798787 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: van Workum, Frans, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on esophagectomies in esophageal cancer: The superiority of minimally invasive surgery
por: Szakó, Lajos, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison
por: Vincke, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
por: Lv, Lu, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer
por: Chowdappa, Ramachandra, et al.
Publicado: (2021)