Cargando…
A double-blinded randomised controlled trial – do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?
Introduction: Traditionally, non-absorbable skin sutures (SS) have been utilised in the closure of the skin in large wounds. More recently, however, skin staples (SC) have been introduced with the aim of reducing closure time and infection rates. Method: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial...
Autores principales: | Agilinko, Joshua, Tan, Poh |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31815085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000142 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Randomized Study Comparing Skin Staples with Subcuticular Sutures for Wound Closure at Caesarean Section in Black-Skinned Women
por: Abdus-Salam, Rukiyat Adeola, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Closure
por: Hasdemir, Pınar Solmaz, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Subcuticular Barbed Suture and Skin Glue Wound Closure Decreases Reoperation and Length of Stay in Geriatric Hip Fractures When Compared With Staples
por: Zhao, Emily, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Aesthetic Comparison between Subcuticular Suture and Staple Closure of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Incision Scars: A Prospective Controlled Single-blinded Trial
por: Rajamand, Sina, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Feng, Juntao, et al.
Publicado: (2021)