Cargando…

Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci

Three promising antibacterial peptides were studied with regard to their ability to inhibit the growth and kill the cells of clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. The multifunctional gramicidin S (GS) was the most potent, compared to the membranot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berditsch, Marina, Afonin, Sergii, Reuster, Jennifer, Lux, Hannah, Schkolin, Kristina, Babii, Oleg, Radchenko, Dmytro S., Abdullah, Issah, William, Nicola, Middel, Volker, Strähle, Uwe, Nelson, Andrew, Valko, Klara, Ulrich, Anne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54212-z
_version_ 1783474551123869696
author Berditsch, Marina
Afonin, Sergii
Reuster, Jennifer
Lux, Hannah
Schkolin, Kristina
Babii, Oleg
Radchenko, Dmytro S.
Abdullah, Issah
William, Nicola
Middel, Volker
Strähle, Uwe
Nelson, Andrew
Valko, Klara
Ulrich, Anne S.
author_facet Berditsch, Marina
Afonin, Sergii
Reuster, Jennifer
Lux, Hannah
Schkolin, Kristina
Babii, Oleg
Radchenko, Dmytro S.
Abdullah, Issah
William, Nicola
Middel, Volker
Strähle, Uwe
Nelson, Andrew
Valko, Klara
Ulrich, Anne S.
author_sort Berditsch, Marina
collection PubMed
description Three promising antibacterial peptides were studied with regard to their ability to inhibit the growth and kill the cells of clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. The multifunctional gramicidin S (GS) was the most potent, compared to the membranotropic temporin L (TL), being more effective than the innate-defence regulator IDR-1018 (IDR). These activities, compared across 16 strains as minimal bactericidal and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC), are independent of bacterial resistance pattern, phenotype variations and/or biofilm-forming potency. For S. aureus strains, complete killing is accomplished by all peptides at 5 × MIC. For E. faecalis strains, only GS exhibits a rapid bactericidal effect at 5 × MIC, while TL and IDR require higher concentrations. The biofilm-preventing activities of all peptides against the six strains with the largest biofilm biomass were compared. GS demonstrates the lowest minimal biofilm inhibiting concentrations, whereas TL and IDR are consistently less effective. In mature biofilms, only GS completely kills the cells of all studied strains. We compare the physicochemical properties, membranolytic activities, model pharmacokinetics and eukaryotic toxicities of the peptides and explain the bactericidal, antipersister and antibiofilm activities of GS by its elevated stability, pronounced cell-penetration ability and effective utilization of multiple modes of antibacterial action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68844562019-12-06 Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci Berditsch, Marina Afonin, Sergii Reuster, Jennifer Lux, Hannah Schkolin, Kristina Babii, Oleg Radchenko, Dmytro S. Abdullah, Issah William, Nicola Middel, Volker Strähle, Uwe Nelson, Andrew Valko, Klara Ulrich, Anne S. Sci Rep Article Three promising antibacterial peptides were studied with regard to their ability to inhibit the growth and kill the cells of clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. The multifunctional gramicidin S (GS) was the most potent, compared to the membranotropic temporin L (TL), being more effective than the innate-defence regulator IDR-1018 (IDR). These activities, compared across 16 strains as minimal bactericidal and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC), are independent of bacterial resistance pattern, phenotype variations and/or biofilm-forming potency. For S. aureus strains, complete killing is accomplished by all peptides at 5 × MIC. For E. faecalis strains, only GS exhibits a rapid bactericidal effect at 5 × MIC, while TL and IDR require higher concentrations. The biofilm-preventing activities of all peptides against the six strains with the largest biofilm biomass were compared. GS demonstrates the lowest minimal biofilm inhibiting concentrations, whereas TL and IDR are consistently less effective. In mature biofilms, only GS completely kills the cells of all studied strains. We compare the physicochemical properties, membranolytic activities, model pharmacokinetics and eukaryotic toxicities of the peptides and explain the bactericidal, antipersister and antibiofilm activities of GS by its elevated stability, pronounced cell-penetration ability and effective utilization of multiple modes of antibacterial action. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884456/ /pubmed/31784584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54212-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Berditsch, Marina
Afonin, Sergii
Reuster, Jennifer
Lux, Hannah
Schkolin, Kristina
Babii, Oleg
Radchenko, Dmytro S.
Abdullah, Issah
William, Nicola
Middel, Volker
Strähle, Uwe
Nelson, Andrew
Valko, Klara
Ulrich, Anne S.
Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title_full Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title_fullStr Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title_full_unstemmed Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title_short Supreme activity of gramicidin S against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
title_sort supreme activity of gramicidin s against resistant, persistent and biofilm cells of staphylococci and enterococci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54212-z
work_keys_str_mv AT berditschmarina supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT afoninsergii supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT reusterjennifer supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT luxhannah supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT schkolinkristina supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT babiioleg supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT radchenkodmytros supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT abdullahissah supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT williamnicola supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT middelvolker supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT strahleuwe supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT nelsonandrew supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT valkoklara supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci
AT ulrichannes supremeactivityofgramicidinsagainstresistantpersistentandbiofilmcellsofstaphylococciandenterococci