Cargando…

Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention

According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resource...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Ashton, Palermo, Romina, Visser, Troy A. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8
_version_ 1783474595386359808
author Roberts, Ashton
Palermo, Romina
Visser, Troy A. W.
author_facet Roberts, Ashton
Palermo, Romina
Visser, Troy A. W.
author_sort Roberts, Ashton
collection PubMed
description According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resources, low dominance stimuli show an advantage. This low dominance bias was hypothesised to occur due to either counter-stereotypicality or attention competition. Here, these two hypotheses were examined across two experiments using modified versions of the attentional blink paradigm, used to measure non-spatial attention, and manipulations of facial dominance in both males and females. The results support the attention competition theory, suggesting that low dominance stimuli have a consistently strong ability to compete for attentional resources. Unexpectedly, high dominance stimuli fluctuate between having a strong and weak ability to compete for the same resources. The results challenge the current understanding of how humans interact with status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68846482019-12-06 Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. Sci Rep Article According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resources, low dominance stimuli show an advantage. This low dominance bias was hypothesised to occur due to either counter-stereotypicality or attention competition. Here, these two hypotheses were examined across two experiments using modified versions of the attentional blink paradigm, used to measure non-spatial attention, and manipulations of facial dominance in both males and females. The results support the attention competition theory, suggesting that low dominance stimuli have a consistently strong ability to compete for attentional resources. Unexpectedly, high dominance stimuli fluctuate between having a strong and weak ability to compete for the same resources. The results challenge the current understanding of how humans interact with status. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884648/ /pubmed/31784586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Roberts, Ashton
Palermo, Romina
Visser, Troy A. W.
Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title_full Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title_fullStr Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title_full_unstemmed Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title_short Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
title_sort unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsashton unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention
AT palermoromina unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention
AT vissertroyaw unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention