Cargando…
Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention
According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resource...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8 |
_version_ | 1783474595386359808 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_facet | Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_sort | Roberts, Ashton |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resources, low dominance stimuli show an advantage. This low dominance bias was hypothesised to occur due to either counter-stereotypicality or attention competition. Here, these two hypotheses were examined across two experiments using modified versions of the attentional blink paradigm, used to measure non-spatial attention, and manipulations of facial dominance in both males and females. The results support the attention competition theory, suggesting that low dominance stimuli have a consistently strong ability to compete for attentional resources. Unexpectedly, high dominance stimuli fluctuate between having a strong and weak ability to compete for the same resources. The results challenge the current understanding of how humans interact with status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6884648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68846482019-12-06 Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. Sci Rep Article According to the Dual Model of Social Hierarchy, one pathway for attaining social status is through dominance (coercion and intimidation). High dominance stimuli are known to more readily attract eye gaze and social attention. However, when there is a competition for non-spatial attentional resources, low dominance stimuli show an advantage. This low dominance bias was hypothesised to occur due to either counter-stereotypicality or attention competition. Here, these two hypotheses were examined across two experiments using modified versions of the attentional blink paradigm, used to measure non-spatial attention, and manipulations of facial dominance in both males and females. The results support the attention competition theory, suggesting that low dominance stimuli have a consistently strong ability to compete for attentional resources. Unexpectedly, high dominance stimuli fluctuate between having a strong and weak ability to compete for the same resources. The results challenge the current understanding of how humans interact with status. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884648/ /pubmed/31784586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Roberts, Ashton Palermo, Romina Visser, Troy A. W. Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title | Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title_full | Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title_fullStr | Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title_short | Unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
title_sort | unravelling how low dominance in faces biases non-spatial attention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31784586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54295-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsashton unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention AT palermoromina unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention AT vissertroyaw unravellinghowlowdominanceinfacesbiasesnonspatialattention |