Cargando…

Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common condition that needs appropriate treatment like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) like eptifibatide prevent procedural ischemic complications after PCI. Eptifibatide has increased the risk of bleedin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shemirani, Hasan, Khosravi, Alireza, Eghbal, Ali, Amirpour, Afshin, Roghani, Farshad, Hashemi-Jazi, Seyed Mohammad, Pourmoghaddas, Ali, Heidari, Ramin, Sajjadieh, Amir, Sadeghi, Nahid, Sanei, Hamid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819752
http://dx.doi.org/10.22122/arya.v15i4.1668
_version_ 1783474605257654272
author Shemirani, Hasan
Khosravi, Alireza
Eghbal, Ali
Amirpour, Afshin
Roghani, Farshad
Hashemi-Jazi, Seyed Mohammad
Pourmoghaddas, Ali
Heidari, Ramin
Sajjadieh, Amir
Sadeghi, Nahid
Sanei, Hamid
author_facet Shemirani, Hasan
Khosravi, Alireza
Eghbal, Ali
Amirpour, Afshin
Roghani, Farshad
Hashemi-Jazi, Seyed Mohammad
Pourmoghaddas, Ali
Heidari, Ramin
Sajjadieh, Amir
Sadeghi, Nahid
Sanei, Hamid
author_sort Shemirani, Hasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common condition that needs appropriate treatment like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) like eptifibatide prevent procedural ischemic complications after PCI. Eptifibatide has increased the risk of bleeding complications, although it is effective in reducing mortality and morbidity. Eptifibatide is routinely used in bolus and infusion forms and the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of bolus-only dose and bolus + infusion strategy for administrating eptifibatide in bleeding complications and consequences after PCI. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on subjects who experienced PCI after incidence of myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomly divided into two groups who received bolus-only dose (n = 51) or bolus + infusion form of eptifibatide (n = 50). Then, PCI blood pressure, mean time duration of hemostasis after arterial sheath removal, laboratory data, need for blood transfusion, and presence of bleeding complications were evaluated. After 6 months, patients were followed for needs for additional coronary interventions. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 61.68 ± 1.50 years. The prevalence of men was 70.29%. There was no significant difference in mean of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during hospitalization (P > 0.050). The mean time duration of hemostasis was 8.13 ± 0.45 minutes in the bolus-only group and 16.46 ± 0.71 minutes in the bolus + infusion group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin (Hb) level, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine level (P > 0.050). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that bolus-only dose of eptifibatide before PCI could be able to decrease significantly bleeding complication and other clinical and cardiovascular outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68847302019-12-09 Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction Shemirani, Hasan Khosravi, Alireza Eghbal, Ali Amirpour, Afshin Roghani, Farshad Hashemi-Jazi, Seyed Mohammad Pourmoghaddas, Ali Heidari, Ramin Sajjadieh, Amir Sadeghi, Nahid Sanei, Hamid ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common condition that needs appropriate treatment like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) like eptifibatide prevent procedural ischemic complications after PCI. Eptifibatide has increased the risk of bleeding complications, although it is effective in reducing mortality and morbidity. Eptifibatide is routinely used in bolus and infusion forms and the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of bolus-only dose and bolus + infusion strategy for administrating eptifibatide in bleeding complications and consequences after PCI. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on subjects who experienced PCI after incidence of myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomly divided into two groups who received bolus-only dose (n = 51) or bolus + infusion form of eptifibatide (n = 50). Then, PCI blood pressure, mean time duration of hemostasis after arterial sheath removal, laboratory data, need for blood transfusion, and presence of bleeding complications were evaluated. After 6 months, patients were followed for needs for additional coronary interventions. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 61.68 ± 1.50 years. The prevalence of men was 70.29%. There was no significant difference in mean of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during hospitalization (P > 0.050). The mean time duration of hemostasis was 8.13 ± 0.45 minutes in the bolus-only group and 16.46 ± 0.71 minutes in the bolus + infusion group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin (Hb) level, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine level (P > 0.050). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that bolus-only dose of eptifibatide before PCI could be able to decrease significantly bleeding complication and other clinical and cardiovascular outcomes. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6884730/ /pubmed/31819752 http://dx.doi.org/10.22122/arya.v15i4.1668 Text en © 2019 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shemirani, Hasan
Khosravi, Alireza
Eghbal, Ali
Amirpour, Afshin
Roghani, Farshad
Hashemi-Jazi, Seyed Mohammad
Pourmoghaddas, Ali
Heidari, Ramin
Sajjadieh, Amir
Sadeghi, Nahid
Sanei, Hamid
Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title_full Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title_short Comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
title_sort comparing efficacy of receiving different dosages of eptifibatide in bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819752
http://dx.doi.org/10.22122/arya.v15i4.1668
work_keys_str_mv AT shemiranihasan comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT khosravialireza comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT eghbalali comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT amirpourafshin comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT roghanifarshad comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT hashemijaziseyedmohammad comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT pourmoghaddasali comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT heidariramin comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT sajjadiehamir comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT sadeghinahid comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction
AT saneihamid comparingefficacyofreceivingdifferentdosagesofeptifibatideinbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninpatientswithmyocardialinfarction