Cargando…

GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial

BACKGROUND: The addition of a GnRH analogue to the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization programs has been seldom proposed due to the presence of GnRH receptors in the endometrium. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of triptorelin addition in short antagonist cycles, compared to cycles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fusi, Francesco M., Brigante, Claudio M., Zanga, Laura, Mignini Renzini, Mario, Bosisio, Chiara, Fadini, Rubens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0543-2
_version_ 1783474623109660672
author Fusi, Francesco M.
Brigante, Claudio M.
Zanga, Laura
Mignini Renzini, Mario
Bosisio, Chiara
Fadini, Rubens
author_facet Fusi, Francesco M.
Brigante, Claudio M.
Zanga, Laura
Mignini Renzini, Mario
Bosisio, Chiara
Fadini, Rubens
author_sort Fusi, Francesco M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The addition of a GnRH analogue to the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization programs has been seldom proposed due to the presence of GnRH receptors in the endometrium. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of triptorelin addition in short antagonist cycles, compared to cycles where the only supplementation was progesterone. METHODS: The primary objective of this study was the study of the effect of Triptorelin addiction during the luteal phase on the live birth rate. Secondary objectives of efficacy were pregnancy rates and implantation rates, as well as safety in terms of OHSS risks. The study was a prospective, randomized, open study, performed in two independent Centers from July 2013 to October 2015. Patients were divided into three groups: a) Regular antagonist protocol, with only luteal progesterone; b) Antagonist protocol with luteal triptorelin as multiple injections, c) Antagonist protocol with luteal triptorelin as single bolus. Descriptive statistics were obtained for all the parameters. Mean and standard deviation were used for all quantitative parameters. Differences between percentages were studied using Chi-square test generalized to the comparison of several proportions. RESULTS: A total number of 1344 patients completed the study, 786 under the age of 35 years, and 558 over 35 years. It was observed an increase of positive HCG results, Clinical pregnancy rates and Delivery rates when triptorelin was added in the luteal phase, irrespective whether as a single bolus or five injections. This increase was statistically significant both for pregnancy rates and delivery rates. The statistic difference between pregnancies and deliveries obtained with or without luteal triptorelin reached p < 0,01. No increase of OHSS risk was observed. CONCLUSIONS: From this large study it appears that the concept of luteal phase supplementation should be revisited. From our study it appears that triptorelin addition to the luteal phase of antagonist cycles, either as a single bolus or using multiple injections, is a good tool to optimize ART results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Provincia di Bergamo (n 1203/2013).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68848082019-12-03 GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial Fusi, Francesco M. Brigante, Claudio M. Zanga, Laura Mignini Renzini, Mario Bosisio, Chiara Fadini, Rubens Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The addition of a GnRH analogue to the luteal phase in in vitro fertilization programs has been seldom proposed due to the presence of GnRH receptors in the endometrium. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of triptorelin addition in short antagonist cycles, compared to cycles where the only supplementation was progesterone. METHODS: The primary objective of this study was the study of the effect of Triptorelin addiction during the luteal phase on the live birth rate. Secondary objectives of efficacy were pregnancy rates and implantation rates, as well as safety in terms of OHSS risks. The study was a prospective, randomized, open study, performed in two independent Centers from July 2013 to October 2015. Patients were divided into three groups: a) Regular antagonist protocol, with only luteal progesterone; b) Antagonist protocol with luteal triptorelin as multiple injections, c) Antagonist protocol with luteal triptorelin as single bolus. Descriptive statistics were obtained for all the parameters. Mean and standard deviation were used for all quantitative parameters. Differences between percentages were studied using Chi-square test generalized to the comparison of several proportions. RESULTS: A total number of 1344 patients completed the study, 786 under the age of 35 years, and 558 over 35 years. It was observed an increase of positive HCG results, Clinical pregnancy rates and Delivery rates when triptorelin was added in the luteal phase, irrespective whether as a single bolus or five injections. This increase was statistically significant both for pregnancy rates and delivery rates. The statistic difference between pregnancies and deliveries obtained with or without luteal triptorelin reached p < 0,01. No increase of OHSS risk was observed. CONCLUSIONS: From this large study it appears that the concept of luteal phase supplementation should be revisited. From our study it appears that triptorelin addition to the luteal phase of antagonist cycles, either as a single bolus or using multiple injections, is a good tool to optimize ART results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Provincia di Bergamo (n 1203/2013). BioMed Central 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884808/ /pubmed/31783862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0543-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fusi, Francesco M.
Brigante, Claudio M.
Zanga, Laura
Mignini Renzini, Mario
Bosisio, Chiara
Fadini, Rubens
GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title_full GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title_fullStr GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title_full_unstemmed GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title_short GnRH agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist IVF cycles: a randomized prospective trial
title_sort gnrh agonists to sustain the luteal phase in antagonist ivf cycles: a randomized prospective trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0543-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fusifrancescom gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial
AT briganteclaudiom gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial
AT zangalaura gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial
AT migninirenzinimario gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial
AT bosisiochiara gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial
AT fadinirubens gnrhagoniststosustainthelutealphaseinantagonistivfcyclesarandomizedprospectivetrial