Cargando…

Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice

BACKGROUND: Application of standards is a way to increase quality in an evaluation study. However, standards are used insufficiently in eHealth evaluation, affecting the generalization of the knowledge generated. This study aimed to explore how standards are used in a practical setting of an eHealth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jurkeviciute, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0975-9
_version_ 1783474630987612160
author Jurkeviciute, Monika
author_facet Jurkeviciute, Monika
author_sort Jurkeviciute, Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Application of standards is a way to increase quality in an evaluation study. However, standards are used insufficiently in eHealth evaluation, affecting the generalization of the knowledge generated. This study aimed to explore how standards are used in a practical setting of an eHealth evaluation, and to identify the factors that can hinder their use. METHODS: The data were collected in a multi-national and interdisciplinary eHealth evaluation study targeted at the elderly people suffering from mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. The study was carried out in four countries and funded by the European Union. The collected data included meeting minutes (n = 8) and e-mail correspondence (n = 261) between partners. The chronological sequence of events related to the use of standards was established. Subsequently, the hindering factors related to the use of standards were identified from the sequence. RESULTS: The use of four standards was described, reflecting a variety of related processes or barriers that emerge during eHealth evaluation. The processes differed based on the type of the standard. Specifically, evaluation frameworks were found to be conceptual standards and they were easy to agree upon, while standardized metrics were more tangible and their use triggered negotiations. Further, the following factors hindered the use of standards in eHealth evaluations: (1) inadequacy of a standard to address a target population or a disease, (2) insufficient resources to use a standard, (3) lack of experience in using a standard, and (4) lack of validation of a standard in a particular location. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization initiatives in eHealth evaluation provide a blueprint for evaluation, but their practical application is problematic. The practical circumstances of an evaluation study can cause deviations in the standards, thus producing heterogeneity in the evaluation methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68848412019-12-03 Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice Jurkeviciute, Monika BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Application of standards is a way to increase quality in an evaluation study. However, standards are used insufficiently in eHealth evaluation, affecting the generalization of the knowledge generated. This study aimed to explore how standards are used in a practical setting of an eHealth evaluation, and to identify the factors that can hinder their use. METHODS: The data were collected in a multi-national and interdisciplinary eHealth evaluation study targeted at the elderly people suffering from mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. The study was carried out in four countries and funded by the European Union. The collected data included meeting minutes (n = 8) and e-mail correspondence (n = 261) between partners. The chronological sequence of events related to the use of standards was established. Subsequently, the hindering factors related to the use of standards were identified from the sequence. RESULTS: The use of four standards was described, reflecting a variety of related processes or barriers that emerge during eHealth evaluation. The processes differed based on the type of the standard. Specifically, evaluation frameworks were found to be conceptual standards and they were easy to agree upon, while standardized metrics were more tangible and their use triggered negotiations. Further, the following factors hindered the use of standards in eHealth evaluations: (1) inadequacy of a standard to address a target population or a disease, (2) insufficient resources to use a standard, (3) lack of experience in using a standard, and (4) lack of validation of a standard in a particular location. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization initiatives in eHealth evaluation provide a blueprint for evaluation, but their practical application is problematic. The practical circumstances of an evaluation study can cause deviations in the standards, thus producing heterogeneity in the evaluation methodologies. BioMed Central 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884841/ /pubmed/31783847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0975-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jurkeviciute, Monika
Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title_full Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title_fullStr Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title_full_unstemmed Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title_short Standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in eHealth evaluation practice
title_sort standards as applied in reality: a case study on the translation of standards in ehealth evaluation practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0975-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jurkeviciutemonika standardsasappliedinrealityacasestudyonthetranslationofstandardsinehealthevaluationpractice