Cargando…
Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have analyzed the effectiveness of electronic reminder interventions to improve different clinical conditions, and most have reported a small to moderate effect. Few studies, however, have analyzed reminder systems targeting multiple conditions, and fewer still have comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0976-8 |
_version_ | 1783474639298625536 |
---|---|
author | Coma, Ermengol Medina, Manuel Méndez, Leonardo Hermosilla, Eduardo Iglesias, Manuel Olmos, Carmen Calero, Sebastian |
author_facet | Coma, Ermengol Medina, Manuel Méndez, Leonardo Hermosilla, Eduardo Iglesias, Manuel Olmos, Carmen Calero, Sebastian |
author_sort | Coma, Ermengol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have analyzed the effectiveness of electronic reminder interventions to improve different clinical conditions, and most have reported a small to moderate effect. Few studies, however, have analyzed reminder systems targeting multiple conditions, and fewer still have compared electronic point-of-care reminders systems with other forms of feedback designed to improve delivery of care. METHODS: We performed an unblinded cluster randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of an electronic point-of-care reminder system with that of a well-established system providing monthly feedback on adherence to clinical recommendations. The control group received monthly feedback only while the intervention group received monthly feedback in addition to on-screen point-of-care reminders for 10 clinical conditions. The study targeted all physicians and nurses at the 283 primary care centers managed by the Institut Català de la Salut (approximately 6600 professionals). RESULTS: Following exclusions and randomization, 132 primary care centers (328,728 patients with reminders) were assigned to the intervention group while 137 centers (317,117 patients with reminders) were randomized to the control group. A 20.6% improvement (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.25–1.34) in reminder resolution rates was observed in the intervention group. Results varied according to the clinical condition. The most effective reminder was screening for diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.51, 95% CI:1.46–1.57) while the least effective reminders were measurement of glycated hemoglobin (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13) and smoking cessation encouragement (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09–1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic point-of-care reminders were more effective than the existing monthly feedback system at resolving the 10 clinical situations. However, more studies are needed to investigate the variations of the effect observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42391639, 08/10/2012. Retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6884876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68848762019-12-03 Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial Coma, Ermengol Medina, Manuel Méndez, Leonardo Hermosilla, Eduardo Iglesias, Manuel Olmos, Carmen Calero, Sebastian BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have analyzed the effectiveness of electronic reminder interventions to improve different clinical conditions, and most have reported a small to moderate effect. Few studies, however, have analyzed reminder systems targeting multiple conditions, and fewer still have compared electronic point-of-care reminders systems with other forms of feedback designed to improve delivery of care. METHODS: We performed an unblinded cluster randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of an electronic point-of-care reminder system with that of a well-established system providing monthly feedback on adherence to clinical recommendations. The control group received monthly feedback only while the intervention group received monthly feedback in addition to on-screen point-of-care reminders for 10 clinical conditions. The study targeted all physicians and nurses at the 283 primary care centers managed by the Institut Català de la Salut (approximately 6600 professionals). RESULTS: Following exclusions and randomization, 132 primary care centers (328,728 patients with reminders) were assigned to the intervention group while 137 centers (317,117 patients with reminders) were randomized to the control group. A 20.6% improvement (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.25–1.34) in reminder resolution rates was observed in the intervention group. Results varied according to the clinical condition. The most effective reminder was screening for diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.51, 95% CI:1.46–1.57) while the least effective reminders were measurement of glycated hemoglobin (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13) and smoking cessation encouragement (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09–1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic point-of-care reminders were more effective than the existing monthly feedback system at resolving the 10 clinical situations. However, more studies are needed to investigate the variations of the effect observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42391639, 08/10/2012. Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884876/ /pubmed/31783854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0976-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Coma, Ermengol Medina, Manuel Méndez, Leonardo Hermosilla, Eduardo Iglesias, Manuel Olmos, Carmen Calero, Sebastian Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title | Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0976-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT comaermengol effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT medinamanuel effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mendezleonardo effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hermosillaeduardo effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT iglesiasmanuel effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT olmoscarmen effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT calerosebastian effectivenessofelectronicpointofcareremindersversusmonthlyfeedbacktoimproveadherenceto10clinicalrecommendationsinprimarycareaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial |