Cargando…
Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7 |
_version_ | 1783474647021387776 |
---|---|
author | Kowalkowski, Marc Chou, Shih-Hsiung McWilliams, Andrew Lashley, Cathryn Murphy, Stephanie Rossman, Whitney Papali, Alfred Heffner, Alan Russo, Mark Burke, Larry Gibbs, Michael Taylor, Stephanie P. |
author_facet | Kowalkowski, Marc Chou, Shih-Hsiung McWilliams, Andrew Lashley, Cathryn Murphy, Stephanie Rossman, Whitney Papali, Alfred Heffner, Alan Russo, Mark Burke, Larry Gibbs, Michael Taylor, Stephanie P. |
author_sort | Kowalkowski, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. METHODS: The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6884908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68849082019-12-03 Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial Kowalkowski, Marc Chou, Shih-Hsiung McWilliams, Andrew Lashley, Cathryn Murphy, Stephanie Rossman, Whitney Papali, Alfred Heffner, Alan Russo, Mark Burke, Larry Gibbs, Michael Taylor, Stephanie P. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. METHODS: The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019. BioMed Central 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884908/ /pubmed/31783900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kowalkowski, Marc Chou, Shih-Hsiung McWilliams, Andrew Lashley, Cathryn Murphy, Stephanie Rossman, Whitney Papali, Alfred Heffner, Alan Russo, Mark Burke, Larry Gibbs, Michael Taylor, Stephanie P. Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title | Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for improving morbidity during post-acute care transitions for sepsis (impacts): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kowalkowskimarc structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choushihhsiung structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcwilliamsandrew structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lashleycathryn structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT murphystephanie structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rossmanwhitney structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT papalialfred structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT heffneralan structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT russomark structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT burkelarry structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gibbsmichael structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taylorstephaniep structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial |