Cargando…

Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalkowski, Marc, Chou, Shih-Hsiung, McWilliams, Andrew, Lashley, Cathryn, Murphy, Stephanie, Rossman, Whitney, Papali, Alfred, Heffner, Alan, Russo, Mark, Burke, Larry, Gibbs, Michael, Taylor, Stephanie P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7
_version_ 1783474647021387776
author Kowalkowski, Marc
Chou, Shih-Hsiung
McWilliams, Andrew
Lashley, Cathryn
Murphy, Stephanie
Rossman, Whitney
Papali, Alfred
Heffner, Alan
Russo, Mark
Burke, Larry
Gibbs, Michael
Taylor, Stephanie P.
author_facet Kowalkowski, Marc
Chou, Shih-Hsiung
McWilliams, Andrew
Lashley, Cathryn
Murphy, Stephanie
Rossman, Whitney
Papali, Alfred
Heffner, Alan
Russo, Mark
Burke, Larry
Gibbs, Michael
Taylor, Stephanie P.
author_sort Kowalkowski, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. METHODS: The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68849082019-12-03 Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial Kowalkowski, Marc Chou, Shih-Hsiung McWilliams, Andrew Lashley, Cathryn Murphy, Stephanie Rossman, Whitney Papali, Alfred Heffner, Alan Russo, Mark Burke, Larry Gibbs, Michael Taylor, Stephanie P. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. METHODS: The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019. BioMed Central 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6884908/ /pubmed/31783900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kowalkowski, Marc
Chou, Shih-Hsiung
McWilliams, Andrew
Lashley, Cathryn
Murphy, Stephanie
Rossman, Whitney
Papali, Alfred
Heffner, Alan
Russo, Mark
Burke, Larry
Gibbs, Michael
Taylor, Stephanie P.
Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title_full Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title_short Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
title_sort structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for improving morbidity during post-acute care transitions for sepsis (impacts): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3792-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalkowskimarc structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choushihhsiung structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcwilliamsandrew structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lashleycathryn structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT murphystephanie structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rossmanwhitney structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT papalialfred structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heffneralan structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT russomark structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT burkelarry structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gibbsmichael structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taylorstephaniep structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT structuredproactivecarecoordinationversususualcareforimprovingmorbidityduringpostacutecaretransitionsforsepsisimpactsapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial