Cargando…

The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?

BACKGROUND: Detectable uptake of (68)Ga-PSMA-ligands in sympathetic ganglia may potentially lead to mistaking them for malignant lesions. Our aim was to investigate the anatomy of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (CTG-C) in the MR part of multimodal (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR imaging, in view of PET fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bialek, Ewa J., Malkowski, Bogdan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2019-0052
_version_ 1783474651552284672
author Bialek, Ewa J.
Malkowski, Bogdan
author_facet Bialek, Ewa J.
Malkowski, Bogdan
author_sort Bialek, Ewa J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detectable uptake of (68)Ga-PSMA-ligands in sympathetic ganglia may potentially lead to mistaking them for malignant lesions. Our aim was to investigate the anatomy of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (CTG-C) in the MR part of multimodal (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR imaging, in view of PET factors hindering its proper identification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 106 patients, 212 sites of the CTG-C were retrospectively reviewed to assess the radiotracer uptake (SUV(max)), size, shape, position, symmetry of location and visual uptake intensity. Asymmetry of PSMA-ligand uptake and increased uptake were regarded as risk factors of malignancy. RESULTS: In 66.0% left (L) and 53.8% right (R) CTG-C we noticed configurations, resembling the shape of an exclamation-mark, a question-mark, or its part (called “typical”). Tumor-like CTG-C shapes (oval, binodular or longitudinal) were detected in 28.3% L-CTG-C and in 40.6% R-CTG-C. When visual assessment of PET suggested malignancy, the recognition of “typical” shape of underlying CTG-C on MR generated a rise in the accuracy of their proper identification (from 34.4% to 75%, χ2(1) = 70.4; p < 0.001). Recognizing the shape of the CTG-C as “typical” in MR allowed us to classify as “not-suspicious” 61.9% of all CTG-C which were treated as “suspicious” after sole PET assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic shape of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (resembling a question-mark, or its part) helps in proper recognition of CTG-C on multimodal whole-body (68)Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MR imaging, when detectable uptake might lead to considering pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6884927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68849272019-12-17 The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR? Bialek, Ewa J. Malkowski, Bogdan Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Detectable uptake of (68)Ga-PSMA-ligands in sympathetic ganglia may potentially lead to mistaking them for malignant lesions. Our aim was to investigate the anatomy of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (CTG-C) in the MR part of multimodal (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR imaging, in view of PET factors hindering its proper identification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 106 patients, 212 sites of the CTG-C were retrospectively reviewed to assess the radiotracer uptake (SUV(max)), size, shape, position, symmetry of location and visual uptake intensity. Asymmetry of PSMA-ligand uptake and increased uptake were regarded as risk factors of malignancy. RESULTS: In 66.0% left (L) and 53.8% right (R) CTG-C we noticed configurations, resembling the shape of an exclamation-mark, a question-mark, or its part (called “typical”). Tumor-like CTG-C shapes (oval, binodular or longitudinal) were detected in 28.3% L-CTG-C and in 40.6% R-CTG-C. When visual assessment of PET suggested malignancy, the recognition of “typical” shape of underlying CTG-C on MR generated a rise in the accuracy of their proper identification (from 34.4% to 75%, χ2(1) = 70.4; p < 0.001). Recognizing the shape of the CTG-C as “typical” in MR allowed us to classify as “not-suspicious” 61.9% of all CTG-C which were treated as “suspicious” after sole PET assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic shape of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (resembling a question-mark, or its part) helps in proper recognition of CTG-C on multimodal whole-body (68)Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MR imaging, when detectable uptake might lead to considering pathology. Sciendo 2019-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6884927/ /pubmed/31652125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2019-0052 Text en © 2019 Ewa J. Bialek, Bogdan Malkowski, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bialek, Ewa J.
Malkowski, Bogdan
The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title_full The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title_fullStr The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title_full_unstemmed The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title_short The “question-mark” MR Anatomy of the Cervico-thoracic Ganglia Complex: Can it Help to Avoid Mistaking it for a Malignant Lesion on (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?
title_sort “question-mark” mr anatomy of the cervico-thoracic ganglia complex: can it help to avoid mistaking it for a malignant lesion on (68)ga-psma-11 pet/mr?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2019-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT bialekewaj thequestionmarkmranatomyofthecervicothoracicgangliacomplexcanithelptoavoidmistakingitforamalignantlesionon68gapsma11petmr
AT malkowskibogdan thequestionmarkmranatomyofthecervicothoracicgangliacomplexcanithelptoavoidmistakingitforamalignantlesionon68gapsma11petmr
AT bialekewaj questionmarkmranatomyofthecervicothoracicgangliacomplexcanithelptoavoidmistakingitforamalignantlesionon68gapsma11petmr
AT malkowskibogdan questionmarkmranatomyofthecervicothoracicgangliacomplexcanithelptoavoidmistakingitforamalignantlesionon68gapsma11petmr