Cargando…
Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506 |
_version_ | 1783474705096769536 |
---|---|
author | Yaman, Emine Subasi, Abdulhamit |
author_facet | Yaman, Emine Subasi, Abdulhamit |
author_sort | Yaman, Emine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers' efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6885261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68852612019-12-11 Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification Yaman, Emine Subasi, Abdulhamit Biomed Res Int Research Article The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers' efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99. Hindawi 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6885261/ /pubmed/31828145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506 Text en Copyright © 2019 Emine Yaman and Abdulhamit Subasi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yaman, Emine Subasi, Abdulhamit Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title | Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title_full | Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title_short | Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification |
title_sort | comparison of bagging and boosting ensemble machine learning methods for automated emg signal classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamanemine comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification AT subasiabdulhamit comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification |