Cargando…

Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification

The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaman, Emine, Subasi, Abdulhamit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506
_version_ 1783474705096769536
author Yaman, Emine
Subasi, Abdulhamit
author_facet Yaman, Emine
Subasi, Abdulhamit
author_sort Yaman, Emine
collection PubMed
description The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers' efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6885261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68852612019-12-11 Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification Yaman, Emine Subasi, Abdulhamit Biomed Res Int Research Article The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers' efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99. Hindawi 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6885261/ /pubmed/31828145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506 Text en Copyright © 2019 Emine Yaman and Abdulhamit Subasi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yaman, Emine
Subasi, Abdulhamit
Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_full Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_fullStr Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_short Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_sort comparison of bagging and boosting ensemble machine learning methods for automated emg signal classification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506
work_keys_str_mv AT yamanemine comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification
AT subasiabdulhamit comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification