Cargando…
Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200 |
_version_ | 1783474743706386432 |
---|---|
author | Porter, Judi Nguo, Kay Collins, Jorja Kellow, Nicole Huggins, Catherine E Gibson, Simone Davidson, Zoe Schoeller, Dale Prentice, Ross Neuhouser, Marian L Snetselaar, Linda Truby, Helen |
author_facet | Porter, Judi Nguo, Kay Collins, Jorja Kellow, Nicole Huggins, Catherine E Gibson, Simone Davidson, Zoe Schoeller, Dale Prentice, Ross Neuhouser, Marian L Snetselaar, Linda Truby, Helen |
author_sort | Porter, Judi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which published predictive equations have the closest agreement between measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) and predicted RMR and 2) utilizing the RMR equations with the best agreement to predict TEE against the reference method of doubly labeled water (DLW). METHODS: A database consisting of international participant-level TEE data from DLW studies was developed to enable comparison with energy requirements estimated by 17 commonly used predictive equations. This database included 31 studies comprising 988 participant-level RMR data and 1488 participant-level TEE data. Mean physical activity level (PAL) was determined for men (PAL = 1.69, n = 320) and women (PAL = 1.66, n = 668). Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of measured RMR and TEE with predicted RMR and TEE in adults aged ≥65 y, and subgroups of 65–79 y and ≥80 y. Linear regression assessed proportional bias. RESULTS: The Ikeda, Livingston, and Mifflin equations most closely agreed with measured RMR and TEE in all adults aged ≥65 y and in the 65–79 y and ≥80 y subgroups. In adults aged ≥65 y, the Ikeda and Livingston equations overestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 175 ± 1362 kJ/d and 86 ± 1344 kJ/d, respectively. The Mifflin equation underestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 24 ± 1401 kJ/d. Proportional bias was present as energy expenditure increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Ikeda, Livingston, or Mifflin equations are recommended for estimating energy requirements of older adults. Future research should focus on developing predictive equations to meet the requirements of the older population with consideration given to body composition and functional measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6885473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68854732019-12-05 Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data Porter, Judi Nguo, Kay Collins, Jorja Kellow, Nicole Huggins, Catherine E Gibson, Simone Davidson, Zoe Schoeller, Dale Prentice, Ross Neuhouser, Marian L Snetselaar, Linda Truby, Helen Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which published predictive equations have the closest agreement between measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) and predicted RMR and 2) utilizing the RMR equations with the best agreement to predict TEE against the reference method of doubly labeled water (DLW). METHODS: A database consisting of international participant-level TEE data from DLW studies was developed to enable comparison with energy requirements estimated by 17 commonly used predictive equations. This database included 31 studies comprising 988 participant-level RMR data and 1488 participant-level TEE data. Mean physical activity level (PAL) was determined for men (PAL = 1.69, n = 320) and women (PAL = 1.66, n = 668). Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of measured RMR and TEE with predicted RMR and TEE in adults aged ≥65 y, and subgroups of 65–79 y and ≥80 y. Linear regression assessed proportional bias. RESULTS: The Ikeda, Livingston, and Mifflin equations most closely agreed with measured RMR and TEE in all adults aged ≥65 y and in the 65–79 y and ≥80 y subgroups. In adults aged ≥65 y, the Ikeda and Livingston equations overestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 175 ± 1362 kJ/d and 86 ± 1344 kJ/d, respectively. The Mifflin equation underestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 24 ± 1401 kJ/d. Proportional bias was present as energy expenditure increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Ikeda, Livingston, or Mifflin equations are recommended for estimating energy requirements of older adults. Future research should focus on developing predictive equations to meet the requirements of the older population with consideration given to body composition and functional measures. Oxford University Press 2019-12 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6885473/ /pubmed/31504100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200 Text en Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Communications Porter, Judi Nguo, Kay Collins, Jorja Kellow, Nicole Huggins, Catherine E Gibson, Simone Davidson, Zoe Schoeller, Dale Prentice, Ross Neuhouser, Marian L Snetselaar, Linda Truby, Helen Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title | Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title_full | Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title_fullStr | Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title_full_unstemmed | Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title_short | Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
title_sort | total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data |
topic | Original Research Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porterjudi totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT nguokay totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT collinsjorja totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT kellownicole totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT hugginscatherinee totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT gibsonsimone totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT davidsonzoe totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT schoellerdale totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT prenticeross totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT neuhousermarianl totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT snetselaarlinda totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata AT trubyhelen totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata |