Cargando…

Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data

BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porter, Judi, Nguo, Kay, Collins, Jorja, Kellow, Nicole, Huggins, Catherine E, Gibson, Simone, Davidson, Zoe, Schoeller, Dale, Prentice, Ross, Neuhouser, Marian L, Snetselaar, Linda, Truby, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200
_version_ 1783474743706386432
author Porter, Judi
Nguo, Kay
Collins, Jorja
Kellow, Nicole
Huggins, Catherine E
Gibson, Simone
Davidson, Zoe
Schoeller, Dale
Prentice, Ross
Neuhouser, Marian L
Snetselaar, Linda
Truby, Helen
author_facet Porter, Judi
Nguo, Kay
Collins, Jorja
Kellow, Nicole
Huggins, Catherine E
Gibson, Simone
Davidson, Zoe
Schoeller, Dale
Prentice, Ross
Neuhouser, Marian L
Snetselaar, Linda
Truby, Helen
author_sort Porter, Judi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which published predictive equations have the closest agreement between measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) and predicted RMR and 2) utilizing the RMR equations with the best agreement to predict TEE against the reference method of doubly labeled water (DLW). METHODS: A database consisting of international participant-level TEE data from DLW studies was developed to enable comparison with energy requirements estimated by 17 commonly used predictive equations. This database included 31 studies comprising 988 participant-level RMR data and 1488 participant-level TEE data. Mean physical activity level (PAL) was determined for men (PAL = 1.69, n = 320) and women (PAL = 1.66, n = 668). Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of measured RMR and TEE with predicted RMR and TEE in adults aged ≥65 y, and subgroups of 65–79 y and ≥80 y. Linear regression assessed proportional bias. RESULTS: The Ikeda, Livingston, and Mifflin equations most closely agreed with measured RMR and TEE in all adults aged ≥65 y and in the 65–79 y and ≥80 y subgroups. In adults aged ≥65 y, the Ikeda and Livingston equations overestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 175 ± 1362 kJ/d and 86 ± 1344 kJ/d, respectively. The Mifflin equation underestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 24 ± 1401 kJ/d. Proportional bias was present as energy expenditure increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Ikeda, Livingston, or Mifflin equations are recommended for estimating energy requirements of older adults. Future research should focus on developing predictive equations to meet the requirements of the older population with consideration given to body composition and functional measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6885473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68854732019-12-05 Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data Porter, Judi Nguo, Kay Collins, Jorja Kellow, Nicole Huggins, Catherine E Gibson, Simone Davidson, Zoe Schoeller, Dale Prentice, Ross Neuhouser, Marian L Snetselaar, Linda Truby, Helen Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which published predictive equations have the closest agreement between measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) and predicted RMR and 2) utilizing the RMR equations with the best agreement to predict TEE against the reference method of doubly labeled water (DLW). METHODS: A database consisting of international participant-level TEE data from DLW studies was developed to enable comparison with energy requirements estimated by 17 commonly used predictive equations. This database included 31 studies comprising 988 participant-level RMR data and 1488 participant-level TEE data. Mean physical activity level (PAL) was determined for men (PAL = 1.69, n = 320) and women (PAL = 1.66, n = 668). Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of measured RMR and TEE with predicted RMR and TEE in adults aged ≥65 y, and subgroups of 65–79 y and ≥80 y. Linear regression assessed proportional bias. RESULTS: The Ikeda, Livingston, and Mifflin equations most closely agreed with measured RMR and TEE in all adults aged ≥65 y and in the 65–79 y and ≥80 y subgroups. In adults aged ≥65 y, the Ikeda and Livingston equations overestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 175 ± 1362 kJ/d and 86 ± 1344 kJ/d, respectively. The Mifflin equation underestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 24 ± 1401 kJ/d. Proportional bias was present as energy expenditure increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Ikeda, Livingston, or Mifflin equations are recommended for estimating energy requirements of older adults. Future research should focus on developing predictive equations to meet the requirements of the older population with consideration given to body composition and functional measures. Oxford University Press 2019-12 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6885473/ /pubmed/31504100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200 Text en Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Porter, Judi
Nguo, Kay
Collins, Jorja
Kellow, Nicole
Huggins, Catherine E
Gibson, Simone
Davidson, Zoe
Schoeller, Dale
Prentice, Ross
Neuhouser, Marian L
Snetselaar, Linda
Truby, Helen
Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title_full Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title_fullStr Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title_full_unstemmed Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title_short Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
title_sort total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz200
work_keys_str_mv AT porterjudi totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT nguokay totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT collinsjorja totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT kellownicole totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT hugginscatherinee totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT gibsonsimone totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT davidsonzoe totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT schoellerdale totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT prenticeross totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT neuhousermarianl totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT snetselaarlinda totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata
AT trubyhelen totalenergyexpendituremeasuredusingdoublylabeledwatercomparedwithestimatedenergyrequirementsinolderadults65yanalysisofprimarydata