Cargando…
Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519 |
_version_ | 1783474758335070208 |
---|---|
author | Goldman, Myla D. LaRocca, Nicholas G. Rudick, Richard A. Hudson, Lynn D. Chin, Peter S. Francis, Gordon S. Jacobs, Adam Kapoor, Raj Matthews, Paul M. Mowry, Ellen M. Balcer, Laura J. Panzara, Michael Phillips, Glenn Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J. Cohen, Jeffrey A. |
author_facet | Goldman, Myla D. LaRocca, Nicholas G. Rudick, Richard A. Hudson, Lynn D. Chin, Peter S. Francis, Gordon S. Jacobs, Adam Kapoor, Raj Matthews, Paul M. Mowry, Ellen M. Balcer, Laura J. Panzara, Michael Phillips, Glenn Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J. Cohen, Jeffrey A. |
author_sort | Goldman, Myla D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, performance measures, and Short Form–36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), were pooled from control and treatment arms of 14 clinical trials. Analyses of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) included measurement properties; construct, convergent, and known group validity; and longitudinal performance of the measures individually and when combined into a multidimensional test battery relative to the EDSS and SF-36 to determine sensitivity and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: The performance measures had excellent test–retest reliability and showed expected differences between subgroups based on disease duration and EDSS level. Progression rates in detecting time to 3-month confirmed worsening were lower for T25FW and 9HPT compared to EDSS, while progression rates for LCLA and SDMT were similar to EDSS. When the 4 measures were analyzed as a multidimensional measure rather than as individual measures, progression on any one performance measure was more sensitive than the EDSS. Worsening on the performance measures analyzed individually or as a multidimensional test battery was associated with clinically meaningful SF-36 PCS score worsening, supporting clinical meaningfulness of designated performance test score worsening. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of the 4 proposed performance measures, individually or combined into a multidimensional test battery as study outcome measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6885577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68855772019-12-24 Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data Goldman, Myla D. LaRocca, Nicholas G. Rudick, Richard A. Hudson, Lynn D. Chin, Peter S. Francis, Gordon S. Jacobs, Adam Kapoor, Raj Matthews, Paul M. Mowry, Ellen M. Balcer, Laura J. Panzara, Michael Phillips, Glenn Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J. Cohen, Jeffrey A. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, performance measures, and Short Form–36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), were pooled from control and treatment arms of 14 clinical trials. Analyses of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) included measurement properties; construct, convergent, and known group validity; and longitudinal performance of the measures individually and when combined into a multidimensional test battery relative to the EDSS and SF-36 to determine sensitivity and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: The performance measures had excellent test–retest reliability and showed expected differences between subgroups based on disease duration and EDSS level. Progression rates in detecting time to 3-month confirmed worsening were lower for T25FW and 9HPT compared to EDSS, while progression rates for LCLA and SDMT were similar to EDSS. When the 4 measures were analyzed as a multidimensional measure rather than as individual measures, progression on any one performance measure was more sensitive than the EDSS. Worsening on the performance measures analyzed individually or as a multidimensional test battery was associated with clinically meaningful SF-36 PCS score worsening, supporting clinical meaningfulness of designated performance test score worsening. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of the 4 proposed performance measures, individually or combined into a multidimensional test battery as study outcome measures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-10-22 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6885577/ /pubmed/31641014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Goldman, Myla D. LaRocca, Nicholas G. Rudick, Richard A. Hudson, Lynn D. Chin, Peter S. Francis, Gordon S. Jacobs, Adam Kapoor, Raj Matthews, Paul M. Mowry, Ellen M. Balcer, Laura J. Panzara, Michael Phillips, Glenn Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J. Cohen, Jeffrey A. Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title | Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title_full | Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title_short | Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
title_sort | evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldmanmylad evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT laroccanicholasg evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT rudickricharda evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT hudsonlynnd evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT chinpeters evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT francisgordons evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT jacobsadam evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT kapoorraj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT matthewspaulm evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT mowryellenm evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT balcerlauraj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT panzaramichael evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT phillipsglenn evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT uitdehaagbernardmj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT cohenjeffreya evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata AT evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata |