Cargando…

Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data

OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldman, Myla D., LaRocca, Nicholas G., Rudick, Richard A., Hudson, Lynn D., Chin, Peter S., Francis, Gordon S., Jacobs, Adam, Kapoor, Raj, Matthews, Paul M., Mowry, Ellen M., Balcer, Laura J., Panzara, Michael, Phillips, Glenn, Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J., Cohen, Jeffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519
_version_ 1783474758335070208
author Goldman, Myla D.
LaRocca, Nicholas G.
Rudick, Richard A.
Hudson, Lynn D.
Chin, Peter S.
Francis, Gordon S.
Jacobs, Adam
Kapoor, Raj
Matthews, Paul M.
Mowry, Ellen M.
Balcer, Laura J.
Panzara, Michael
Phillips, Glenn
Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J.
Cohen, Jeffrey A.
author_facet Goldman, Myla D.
LaRocca, Nicholas G.
Rudick, Richard A.
Hudson, Lynn D.
Chin, Peter S.
Francis, Gordon S.
Jacobs, Adam
Kapoor, Raj
Matthews, Paul M.
Mowry, Ellen M.
Balcer, Laura J.
Panzara, Michael
Phillips, Glenn
Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J.
Cohen, Jeffrey A.
author_sort Goldman, Myla D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, performance measures, and Short Form–36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), were pooled from control and treatment arms of 14 clinical trials. Analyses of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) included measurement properties; construct, convergent, and known group validity; and longitudinal performance of the measures individually and when combined into a multidimensional test battery relative to the EDSS and SF-36 to determine sensitivity and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: The performance measures had excellent test–retest reliability and showed expected differences between subgroups based on disease duration and EDSS level. Progression rates in detecting time to 3-month confirmed worsening were lower for T25FW and 9HPT compared to EDSS, while progression rates for LCLA and SDMT were similar to EDSS. When the 4 measures were analyzed as a multidimensional measure rather than as individual measures, progression on any one performance measure was more sensitive than the EDSS. Worsening on the performance measures analyzed individually or as a multidimensional test battery was associated with clinically meaningful SF-36 PCS score worsening, supporting clinical meaningfulness of designated performance test score worsening. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of the 4 proposed performance measures, individually or combined into a multidimensional test battery as study outcome measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6885577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68855772019-12-24 Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data Goldman, Myla D. LaRocca, Nicholas G. Rudick, Richard A. Hudson, Lynn D. Chin, Peter S. Francis, Gordon S. Jacobs, Adam Kapoor, Raj Matthews, Paul M. Mowry, Ellen M. Balcer, Laura J. Panzara, Michael Phillips, Glenn Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J. Cohen, Jeffrey A. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: We report analyses of a pooled database by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium to evaluate 4 proposed components of a multidimensional test battery. METHODS: Standardized data on 12,776 participants, comprising demographics, multiple sclerosis disease characteristics, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, performance measures, and Short Form–36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), were pooled from control and treatment arms of 14 clinical trials. Analyses of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) included measurement properties; construct, convergent, and known group validity; and longitudinal performance of the measures individually and when combined into a multidimensional test battery relative to the EDSS and SF-36 to determine sensitivity and clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: The performance measures had excellent test–retest reliability and showed expected differences between subgroups based on disease duration and EDSS level. Progression rates in detecting time to 3-month confirmed worsening were lower for T25FW and 9HPT compared to EDSS, while progression rates for LCLA and SDMT were similar to EDSS. When the 4 measures were analyzed as a multidimensional measure rather than as individual measures, progression on any one performance measure was more sensitive than the EDSS. Worsening on the performance measures analyzed individually or as a multidimensional test battery was associated with clinically meaningful SF-36 PCS score worsening, supporting clinical meaningfulness of designated performance test score worsening. CONCLUSION: These results support the use of the 4 proposed performance measures, individually or combined into a multidimensional test battery as study outcome measures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-10-22 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6885577/ /pubmed/31641014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Goldman, Myla D.
LaRocca, Nicholas G.
Rudick, Richard A.
Hudson, Lynn D.
Chin, Peter S.
Francis, Gordon S.
Jacobs, Adam
Kapoor, Raj
Matthews, Paul M.
Mowry, Ellen M.
Balcer, Laura J.
Panzara, Michael
Phillips, Glenn
Uitdehaag, Bernard M.J.
Cohen, Jeffrey A.
Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title_full Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title_fullStr Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title_short Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
title_sort evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008519
work_keys_str_mv AT goldmanmylad evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT laroccanicholasg evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT rudickricharda evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT hudsonlynnd evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT chinpeters evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT francisgordons evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT jacobsadam evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT kapoorraj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT matthewspaulm evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT mowryellenm evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT balcerlauraj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT panzaramichael evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT phillipsglenn evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT uitdehaagbernardmj evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT cohenjeffreya evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata
AT evaluationofmultiplesclerosisdisabilityoutcomemeasuresusingpooledclinicaltrialdata