Cargando…

Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study

OBJECTIVE: Genetic causes are increasingly identified in patients with focal epilepsy. These genetic causes may be related to the effectiveness of epilepsy surgery. We aimed to assess the use and yield of genetic testing in a large cohort of patients who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanders, Maurits W. C. B., Lemmens, Cynthia M. C., Jansen, Floor E., Brilstra, Eva H., Koeleman, Bobby P. C., Braun, Kees P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12366
_version_ 1783474764554174464
author Sanders, Maurits W. C. B.
Lemmens, Cynthia M. C.
Jansen, Floor E.
Brilstra, Eva H.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Braun, Kees P. J.
author_facet Sanders, Maurits W. C. B.
Lemmens, Cynthia M. C.
Jansen, Floor E.
Brilstra, Eva H.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Braun, Kees P. J.
author_sort Sanders, Maurits W. C. B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Genetic causes are increasingly identified in patients with focal epilepsy. These genetic causes may be related to the effectiveness of epilepsy surgery. We aimed to assess the use and yield of genetic testing in a large cohort of patients who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single‐center consecutive cohort study of patients who were evaluated for surgery between 1990 and 2016. Within this cohort, we assessed the use of genetic testing—either before or after presurgical decision‐making. We evaluated genetic results as well as the outcome of presurgical decision‐making and surgery, and compared these end points for different subgroups—especially MRI‐positive vs MRI‐negative patients. Patients with tuberous sclerosis (TSC) and KRIT1 mutations were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2385 epilepsy patients who were evaluated for surgery, 1280 (54%) received surgical treatment in our center. Of the entire cohort, 325 (14%) underwent genetic testing, comprising 156 of 450 MRI‐negative patients (35%) vs 169 of 1935 MRI‐positive patients (9%). A genetic cause of epilepsy was found in 40 of the 325 patients (12%, 2% of the entire cohort), mainly consisting of mutations in ion channel function and synaptic transmission genes, and mTOR pathway gene mutations. Three of the seven patients with mTOR pathway gene mutations underwent surgery; two achieved complete seizure freedom. One of the 17 patients with germline mutations in ion channel function and synaptic transmission genes received resective surgery but was not rendered seizure‐free; two other patients underwent invasive intracranial EEG‐monitoring before being rejected. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that genetic testing is increasingly applied in focal epilepsy patients who are considered for epilepsy surgery. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing is highest in next generation sequencing techniques, and the outcome of genetic testing assists selecting eligible patients for invasive intracranial monitoring and resective surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6885658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68856582019-12-09 Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study Sanders, Maurits W. C. B. Lemmens, Cynthia M. C. Jansen, Floor E. Brilstra, Eva H. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Braun, Kees P. J. Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: Genetic causes are increasingly identified in patients with focal epilepsy. These genetic causes may be related to the effectiveness of epilepsy surgery. We aimed to assess the use and yield of genetic testing in a large cohort of patients who were evaluated for epilepsy surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single‐center consecutive cohort study of patients who were evaluated for surgery between 1990 and 2016. Within this cohort, we assessed the use of genetic testing—either before or after presurgical decision‐making. We evaluated genetic results as well as the outcome of presurgical decision‐making and surgery, and compared these end points for different subgroups—especially MRI‐positive vs MRI‐negative patients. Patients with tuberous sclerosis (TSC) and KRIT1 mutations were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2385 epilepsy patients who were evaluated for surgery, 1280 (54%) received surgical treatment in our center. Of the entire cohort, 325 (14%) underwent genetic testing, comprising 156 of 450 MRI‐negative patients (35%) vs 169 of 1935 MRI‐positive patients (9%). A genetic cause of epilepsy was found in 40 of the 325 patients (12%, 2% of the entire cohort), mainly consisting of mutations in ion channel function and synaptic transmission genes, and mTOR pathway gene mutations. Three of the seven patients with mTOR pathway gene mutations underwent surgery; two achieved complete seizure freedom. One of the 17 patients with germline mutations in ion channel function and synaptic transmission genes received resective surgery but was not rendered seizure‐free; two other patients underwent invasive intracranial EEG‐monitoring before being rejected. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that genetic testing is increasingly applied in focal epilepsy patients who are considered for epilepsy surgery. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing is highest in next generation sequencing techniques, and the outcome of genetic testing assists selecting eligible patients for invasive intracranial monitoring and resective surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6885658/ /pubmed/31819917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12366 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Sanders, Maurits W. C. B.
Lemmens, Cynthia M. C.
Jansen, Floor E.
Brilstra, Eva H.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Braun, Kees P. J.
Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title_full Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title_fullStr Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title_short Implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: A single‐center cohort study
title_sort implications of genetic diagnostics in epilepsy surgery candidates: a single‐center cohort study
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12366
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersmauritswcb implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT lemmenscynthiamc implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT jansenfloore implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT brilstraevah implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT koelemanbobbypc implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT braunkeespj implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT implicationsofgeneticdiagnosticsinepilepsysurgerycandidatesasinglecentercohortstudy