Cargando…

Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE: To investigate the comparative efficacies of the five most commonly used bisphosphonates for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: Five databases and the reference lists of all acquired articles from inception to July 2017 were sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Lei, Min, Nan, Wang, Fei, Xue, Qing-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2594149
_version_ 1783474803408109568
author Shi, Lei
Min, Nan
Wang, Fei
Xue, Qing-Yun
author_facet Shi, Lei
Min, Nan
Wang, Fei
Xue, Qing-Yun
author_sort Shi, Lei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the comparative efficacies of the five most commonly used bisphosphonates for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: Five databases and the reference lists of all acquired articles from inception to July 2017 were searched. A Bayesian random-effects model was employed, and vertebral, hip and nonvertebral nonhip fractures were assessed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95%credible intervals. Furthermore, with respect to each endpoint, rank probabilities for each bisphosphonate were evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible studies were identified involving 11,822 patients with osteoporotic fractures. Overall in the pairwise meta-analyses, bisphosphonate use significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral nonhip fractures, with ORs and 95% confidence intervals of 0.56 (0.49–0.64), 0.69 (0.48–0.98), and 0.82 (0.70–0.97), respectively. In network meta-analyses, significant differences were found between placebo and any one of the five bisphosphonates for new vertebral fractures. The rank probability plot and the SUCRA calculation results suggested that alendronate was the best intervention (14.6%) for secondary prevention of vertebral fractures, followed by zoledronate (15.3%) and etidronate (22.1%). In terms of the incidence of new hip fractures, alendronate was associated with the lowest incidence (18.5%), followed by zoledronate (43.1%) and risedronate (52.5%). However, zoledronate ranked lowest (16.6%) regarding the incidence of new nonvertebral nonhip fractures, followed by risedronate (23.8%) and alendronate (44.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates show significant efficacy for secondary prevention of new vertebral fractures, and alendronate is most likely to be successful at secondary prevention of vertebral and hip fractures compared with the other four bisphosphonates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6885847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68858472019-12-11 Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Shi, Lei Min, Nan Wang, Fei Xue, Qing-Yun Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the comparative efficacies of the five most commonly used bisphosphonates for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: Five databases and the reference lists of all acquired articles from inception to July 2017 were searched. A Bayesian random-effects model was employed, and vertebral, hip and nonvertebral nonhip fractures were assessed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95%credible intervals. Furthermore, with respect to each endpoint, rank probabilities for each bisphosphonate were evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible studies were identified involving 11,822 patients with osteoporotic fractures. Overall in the pairwise meta-analyses, bisphosphonate use significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral nonhip fractures, with ORs and 95% confidence intervals of 0.56 (0.49–0.64), 0.69 (0.48–0.98), and 0.82 (0.70–0.97), respectively. In network meta-analyses, significant differences were found between placebo and any one of the five bisphosphonates for new vertebral fractures. The rank probability plot and the SUCRA calculation results suggested that alendronate was the best intervention (14.6%) for secondary prevention of vertebral fractures, followed by zoledronate (15.3%) and etidronate (22.1%). In terms of the incidence of new hip fractures, alendronate was associated with the lowest incidence (18.5%), followed by zoledronate (43.1%) and risedronate (52.5%). However, zoledronate ranked lowest (16.6%) regarding the incidence of new nonvertebral nonhip fractures, followed by risedronate (23.8%) and alendronate (44.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates show significant efficacy for secondary prevention of new vertebral fractures, and alendronate is most likely to be successful at secondary prevention of vertebral and hip fractures compared with the other four bisphosphonates. Hindawi 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6885847/ /pubmed/31828096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2594149 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lei Shi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Lei
Min, Nan
Wang, Fei
Xue, Qing-Yun
Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort bisphosphonates for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6885847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2594149
work_keys_str_mv AT shilei bisphosphonatesforsecondarypreventionofosteoporoticfracturesabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT minnan bisphosphonatesforsecondarypreventionofosteoporoticfracturesabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangfei bisphosphonatesforsecondarypreventionofosteoporoticfracturesabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xueqingyun bisphosphonatesforsecondarypreventionofosteoporoticfracturesabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials