Cargando…
A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31787080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1 |
_version_ | 1783474839370072064 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bangke Zhou, Fengjin Wang, Liang Wang, Haibin Jiang, Jiayao Guo, Qunfeng Lu, Xuhua |
author_facet | Zhang, Bangke Zhou, Fengjin Wang, Liang Wang, Haibin Jiang, Jiayao Guo, Qunfeng Lu, Xuhua |
author_sort | Zhang, Bangke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse approach and the Kambin’s Triangle. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with traumatic upper lumbar fracture who received this new approach surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 constituted the new approach group. Twenty-nine patients received the traditional open posterior surgery between January 2014 and January 2015 were classified as the traditional posterior surgery group. Surgical informations including operative time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospitalization days were collected and compared among the two groups. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the new approach group had fewer operation time (128.3 ± 25.1 vs 151 ± 32.2 min, P = 0.01), less blood loss (243.8 ± 135.5 vs 437.8 ± 224.9 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (70.7 ± 57.2 vs 271.7 ± 95.5 ml, P < 0.001), as well as shorter hospitalization stay than the traditional posterior surgery group (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 8.5 ± 2.4 d, P = 0.004). Similar neurologic recovery according to ASIA grade was achieved in both groups (Recovery index: 0.90 ± 0.53 vs 0.86 ± 0.51, P = 0.778). While the pain level was significantly lower in the new approach group postoperatively (2.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at 12 months follow-up (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present new approach was successfully applied in the treatment of upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. It can reduce iatrogenic trauma and achieve similar or better outcomes compared to the traditional posterior surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6886208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68862082019-12-11 A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery Zhang, Bangke Zhou, Fengjin Wang, Liang Wang, Haibin Jiang, Jiayao Guo, Qunfeng Lu, Xuhua BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse approach and the Kambin’s Triangle. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with traumatic upper lumbar fracture who received this new approach surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 constituted the new approach group. Twenty-nine patients received the traditional open posterior surgery between January 2014 and January 2015 were classified as the traditional posterior surgery group. Surgical informations including operative time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospitalization days were collected and compared among the two groups. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the new approach group had fewer operation time (128.3 ± 25.1 vs 151 ± 32.2 min, P = 0.01), less blood loss (243.8 ± 135.5 vs 437.8 ± 224.9 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (70.7 ± 57.2 vs 271.7 ± 95.5 ml, P < 0.001), as well as shorter hospitalization stay than the traditional posterior surgery group (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 8.5 ± 2.4 d, P = 0.004). Similar neurologic recovery according to ASIA grade was achieved in both groups (Recovery index: 0.90 ± 0.53 vs 0.86 ± 0.51, P = 0.778). While the pain level was significantly lower in the new approach group postoperatively (2.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at 12 months follow-up (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present new approach was successfully applied in the treatment of upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. It can reduce iatrogenic trauma and achieve similar or better outcomes compared to the traditional posterior surgery. BioMed Central 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6886208/ /pubmed/31787080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Bangke Zhou, Fengjin Wang, Liang Wang, Haibin Jiang, Jiayao Guo, Qunfeng Lu, Xuhua A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title | A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title_full | A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title_fullStr | A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title_short | A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
title_sort | new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31787080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbangke anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT zhoufengjin anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT wangliang anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT wanghaibin anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT jiangjiayao anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT guoqunfeng anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT luxuhua anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT zhangbangke newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT zhoufengjin newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT wangliang newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT wanghaibin newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT jiangjiayao newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT guoqunfeng newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery AT luxuhua newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery |