Cargando…

A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery

BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bangke, Zhou, Fengjin, Wang, Liang, Wang, Haibin, Jiang, Jiayao, Guo, Qunfeng, Lu, Xuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31787080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1
_version_ 1783474839370072064
author Zhang, Bangke
Zhou, Fengjin
Wang, Liang
Wang, Haibin
Jiang, Jiayao
Guo, Qunfeng
Lu, Xuhua
author_facet Zhang, Bangke
Zhou, Fengjin
Wang, Liang
Wang, Haibin
Jiang, Jiayao
Guo, Qunfeng
Lu, Xuhua
author_sort Zhang, Bangke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse approach and the Kambin’s Triangle. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with traumatic upper lumbar fracture who received this new approach surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 constituted the new approach group. Twenty-nine patients received the traditional open posterior surgery between January 2014 and January 2015 were classified as the traditional posterior surgery group. Surgical informations including operative time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospitalization days were collected and compared among the two groups. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the new approach group had fewer operation time (128.3 ± 25.1 vs 151 ± 32.2 min, P = 0.01), less blood loss (243.8 ± 135.5 vs 437.8 ± 224.9 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (70.7 ± 57.2 vs 271.7 ± 95.5 ml, P < 0.001), as well as shorter hospitalization stay than the traditional posterior surgery group (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 8.5 ± 2.4 d, P = 0.004). Similar neurologic recovery according to ASIA grade was achieved in both groups (Recovery index: 0.90 ± 0.53 vs 0.86 ± 0.51, P = 0.778). While the pain level was significantly lower in the new approach group postoperatively (2.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at 12 months follow-up (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present new approach was successfully applied in the treatment of upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. It can reduce iatrogenic trauma and achieve similar or better outcomes compared to the traditional posterior surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68862082019-12-11 A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery Zhang, Bangke Zhou, Fengjin Wang, Liang Wang, Haibin Jiang, Jiayao Guo, Qunfeng Lu, Xuhua BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse approach and the Kambin’s Triangle. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with traumatic upper lumbar fracture who received this new approach surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 constituted the new approach group. Twenty-nine patients received the traditional open posterior surgery between January 2014 and January 2015 were classified as the traditional posterior surgery group. Surgical informations including operative time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospitalization days were collected and compared among the two groups. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the new approach group had fewer operation time (128.3 ± 25.1 vs 151 ± 32.2 min, P = 0.01), less blood loss (243.8 ± 135.5 vs 437.8 ± 224.9 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (70.7 ± 57.2 vs 271.7 ± 95.5 ml, P < 0.001), as well as shorter hospitalization stay than the traditional posterior surgery group (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 8.5 ± 2.4 d, P = 0.004). Similar neurologic recovery according to ASIA grade was achieved in both groups (Recovery index: 0.90 ± 0.53 vs 0.86 ± 0.51, P = 0.778). While the pain level was significantly lower in the new approach group postoperatively (2.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at 12 months follow-up (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present new approach was successfully applied in the treatment of upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. It can reduce iatrogenic trauma and achieve similar or better outcomes compared to the traditional posterior surgery. BioMed Central 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6886208/ /pubmed/31787080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Bangke
Zhou, Fengjin
Wang, Liang
Wang, Haibin
Jiang, Jiayao
Guo, Qunfeng
Lu, Xuhua
A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title_full A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title_fullStr A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title_full_unstemmed A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title_short A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
title_sort new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31787080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbangke anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT zhoufengjin anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT wangliang anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT wanghaibin anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT jiangjiayao anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT guoqunfeng anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT luxuhua anewdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT zhangbangke newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT zhoufengjin newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT wangliang newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT wanghaibin newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT jiangjiayao newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT guoqunfeng newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery
AT luxuhua newdecompressiontechniqueforupperlumbarfracturewithneurologicdeficitcomparisonwithtraditionalopenposteriorsurgery